Skip to content

[Debugger] Add global rate limiter and clean up adaptive samplers#8480

Draft
dudikeleti wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
dudik/probes-global-rate-limit
Draft

[Debugger] Add global rate limiter and clean up adaptive samplers#8480
dudikeleti wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
dudik/probes-global-rate-limit

Conversation

@dudikeleti
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dudikeleti dudikeleti commented Apr 17, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Summary of changes

  • Add a process-wide debugger global rate limiter for snapshot and log probes.
  • Wire service sampling updates and removals through ConfigurationUpdater, DebuggerFactory, and DynamicInstrumentation.
  • Preserve the existing condition -> global limiter -> per-probe limiter ordering in ProbeProcessor, while leaving metric and span-decoration probes unchanged.
  • Dispose timer-backed adaptive samplers when global or per-probe rate limits are replaced or removed.
  • Trim global limiter overhead by sampling on probe type and probe id and by switching warning logs to typed logger overloads.
  • Add focused tests for configuration updates, sampling order, sampler disposal, and debugger lifecycle behavior.

Reason for change

  • Enforce a debugger-wide budget alongside the existing per-probe sampling limits.
  • Avoid keeping timer-backed samplers alive after replacement/removal and reduce overhead on performance-sensitive probe processing paths.

Implementation details

  • Use ServiceConfiguration.Sampling.SnapshotsPerSecond as the global cap source, with fallback snapshot/log defaults in the global limiter.
  • Reset the global limiter on debugger startup and service-config removal, and dispose active global samplers on debugger shutdown.
  • Dispose samplers that lose add/remove races only when ownership stays in the current code path.
  • Make HasRateLimitChanged track service sampling only, so rate-limit updates do not run on unrelated probe/filter changes.

Test coverage

  • dotnet test "tracer/test/Datadog.Trace.Tests/Datadog.Trace.Tests.csproj" --filter "FullyQualifiedName~Datadog.Trace.Tests.Debugger.DebuggerGlobalRateLimiterTests|FullyQualifiedName~Datadog.Trace.Tests.Debugger.ProbeRateLimiterTests|FullyQualifiedName~Datadog.Trace.Tests.Debugger.ProbeProcessorTests|FullyQualifiedName~Datadog.Trace.Tests.Debugger.ConfigurationUpdaterTests|FullyQualifiedName~Datadog.Trace.Tests.Debugger.DynamicInstrumentationTests|FullyQualifiedName~Datadog.Trace.Tests.Debugger.AdaptiveSamplerTests|FullyQualifiedName~Datadog.Trace.Tests.Debugger.ProbeConfigurationComparerTests"

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot bot commented Apr 18, 2026

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8480) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration75.13 ± (74.97 - 75.67) ms73.84 ± (73.89 - 74.48) ms-1.7%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration77.75 ± (77.65 - 78.13) ms77.89 ± (77.90 - 78.38) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1077.31 ± (1075.95 - 1082.99) ms1067.87 ± (1069.21 - 1075.14) ms-0.9%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.77 ± (22.71 - 22.84) ms23.05 ± (22.97 - 23.12) ms+1.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms87.61 ± (87.27 - 87.95) ms86.89 ± (86.54 - 87.24) ms-0.8%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.91 ± (10.90 - 10.91) MB10.91 ± (10.90 - 10.91) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.46 ± (22.42 - 22.50) ms22.61 ± (22.56 - 22.66) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms85.39 ± (85.20 - 85.58) ms85.84 ± (85.63 - 86.05) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.90 ± (10.89 - 10.91) MB10.93 ± (10.93 - 10.94) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms229.51 ± (228.55 - 230.47) ms230.24 ± (229.19 - 231.29) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms529.68 ± (528.38 - 530.97) ms525.47 ± (524.25 - 526.70) ms-0.8%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.41 ± (48.39 - 48.44) MB48.42 ± (48.39 - 48.45) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.20 ± (21.16 - 21.25) ms21.25 ± (21.21 - 21.29) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms73.70 ± (73.46 - 73.94) ms73.19 ± (73.02 - 73.36) ms-0.7%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.63 ± (10.62 - 10.63) MB10.62 ± (10.62 - 10.62) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms21.16 ± (21.13 - 21.20) ms21.22 ± (21.18 - 21.27) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms74.56 ± (74.37 - 74.75) ms74.45 ± (74.28 - 74.61) ms-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.74 ± (10.74 - 10.74) MB10.73 ± (10.73 - 10.74) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms383.57 ± (381.42 - 385.73) ms385.40 ± (383.38 - 387.43) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms529.81 ± (528.56 - 531.06) ms524.32 ± (523.11 - 525.54) ms-1.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.87 ± (49.84 - 49.89) MB50.07 ± (50.05 - 50.10) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.0%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.90 ± (19.84 - 19.96) ms19.78 ± (19.72 - 19.84) ms-0.6%✅
process.time_to_main_ms75.65 ± (75.34 - 75.96) ms74.52 ± (74.24 - 74.81) ms-1.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.67 ± (7.66 - 7.67) MB7.65 ± (7.64 - 7.65) MB-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.58 ± (19.54 - 19.63) ms19.49 ± (19.45 - 19.53) ms-0.5%✅
process.time_to_main_ms74.75 ± (74.52 - 74.98) ms73.78 ± (73.62 - 73.94) ms-1.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.71 ± (7.71 - 7.72) MB7.70 ± (7.70 - 7.71) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms307.22 ± (304.73 - 309.70) ms305.91 ± (303.75 - 308.06) ms-0.4%✅
process.time_to_main_ms491.18 ± (489.70 - 492.65) ms489.50 ± (488.47 - 490.54) ms-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed37.04 ± (37.02 - 37.07) MB37.02 ± (37.00 - 37.05) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)-0.4%✅

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration208.95 ± (208.89 - 209.78) ms190.65 ± (190.49 - 191.42) ms-8.8%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration213.64 ± (213.26 - 214.19) ms193.62 ± (193.65 - 194.06) ms-9.4%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1228.03 ± (1225.22 - 1231.65) ms1147.55 ± (1149.01 - 1155.85) ms-6.6%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms204.05 ± (203.60 - 204.51) ms184.76 ± (184.52 - 185.00) ms-9.5%✅
process.time_to_main_ms89.05 ± (88.77 - 89.32) ms80.31 ± (80.14 - 80.48) ms-9.8%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed15.84 ± (15.83 - 15.86) MB16.16 ± (16.13 - 16.19) MB+2.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (19 - 20)-1.6%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms203.10 ± (202.74 - 203.45) ms184.75 ± (184.49 - 185.01) ms-9.0%✅
process.time_to_main_ms91.06 ± (90.81 - 91.32) ms81.79 ± (81.64 - 81.94) ms-10.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed15.91 ± (15.89 - 15.93) MB16.19 ± (16.17 - 16.22) MB+1.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (21 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)-1.2%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms417.69 ± (416.49 - 418.88) ms392.50 ± (391.26 - 393.74) ms-6.0%✅
process.time_to_main_ms551.42 ± (550.27 - 552.58) ms506.70 ± (505.52 - 507.87) ms-8.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed59.36 ± (59.32 - 59.40) MB58.69 ± (58.47 - 58.92) MB-1.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.6%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms208.78 ± (208.39 - 209.16) ms189.95 ± (189.72 - 190.17) ms-9.0%✅
process.time_to_main_ms78.10 ± (77.81 - 78.39) ms70.11 ± (69.96 - 70.26) ms-10.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.19 ± (16.16 - 16.21) MB16.25 ± (16.11 - 16.40) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (19 - 20)18 ± (18 - 18)-7.3%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms209.98 ± (209.50 - 210.45) ms188.72 ± (188.53 - 188.92) ms-10.1%✅
process.time_to_main_ms79.57 ± (79.31 - 79.83) ms70.91 ± (70.82 - 71.01) ms-10.9%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.23 ± (16.20 - 16.25) MB16.03 ± (15.87 - 16.19) MB-1.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (20 - 21)19 ± (19 - 19)-7.7%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms598.07 ± (595.37 - 600.78) ms596.47 ± (593.76 - 599.19) ms-0.3%✅
process.time_to_main_ms547.75 ± (546.80 - 548.71) ms507.72 ± (506.90 - 508.53) ms-7.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.66 ± (61.54 - 61.77) MB61.46 ± (61.36 - 61.56) MB-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)30 ± (30 - 30)-1.8%✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms207.53 ± (207.10 - 207.97) ms186.43 ± (186.20 - 186.67) ms-10.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms76.72 ± (76.51 - 76.93) ms69.25 ± (69.07 - 69.44) ms-9.7%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.58 ± (11.57 - 11.60) MB11.78 ± (11.72 - 11.84) MB+1.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)18 ± (17 - 18)-6.7%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms206.68 ± (206.21 - 207.16) ms185.36 ± (185.15 - 185.56) ms-10.3%✅
process.time_to_main_ms78.04 ± (77.83 - 78.24) ms70.11 ± (70.05 - 70.16) ms-10.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.60 ± (11.58 - 11.62) MB11.66 ± (11.57 - 11.76) MB+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)19 ± (18 - 19)-7.4%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms528.06 ± (523.33 - 532.79) ms520.30 ± (517.83 - 522.78) ms-1.5%✅
process.time_to_main_ms510.13 ± (509.22 - 511.04) ms468.17 ± (467.43 - 468.90) ms-8.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.69 ± (50.64 - 50.75) MB50.68 ± (50.65 - 50.71) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.2%✅⬆️
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8480) - mean (74ms)  : 70, 79
    master - mean (75ms)  : 70, 80

    section Bailout
    This PR (8480) - mean (78ms)  : 74, 82
    master - mean (78ms)  : 74, 81

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8480) - mean (1,072ms)  : 1028, 1116
    master - mean (1,079ms)  : 1029, 1130
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8480) - mean (117ms)  : 110, 124
    master - mean (118ms)  : 112, 124

    section Bailout
    This PR (8480) - mean (115ms)  : 111, 119
    master - mean (115ms)  : 112, 117

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8480) - mean (791ms)  : 769, 814
    master - mean (797ms)  : 769, 824
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8480) - mean (101ms)  : 97, 104
    master - mean (101ms)  : 96, 107

    section Bailout
    This PR (8480) - mean (102ms)  : 99, 105
    master - mean (102ms)  : 99, 105

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8480) - mean (939ms)  : 899, 979
    master - mean (942ms)  : 897, 987
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8480) - mean (102ms)  : 97, 108
    master - mean (103ms)  : 97, 110

    section Bailout
    This PR (8480) - mean (101ms)  : 98, 104
    master - mean (102ms)  : 97, 107

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8480) - mean (825ms)  : 792, 858
    master - mean (832ms)  : 791, 873
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8480) - mean (191ms)  : 186, 196
    master - mean (209ms)  : 205, 214

    section Bailout
    This PR (8480) - mean (194ms)  : 192, 196
    master - mean (214ms)  : 209, 218

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8480) - mean (1,152ms)  : 1103, 1202
    master - mean (1,228ms)  : 1183, 1274
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8480) - mean (274ms)  : 270, 277
    master - mean (303ms)  : 292, 313

    section Bailout
    This PR (8480) - mean (275ms)  : 271, 278
    master - mean (303ms)  : 297, 309

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8480) - mean (927ms)  : 911, 943
    master - mean (1,006ms)  : 967, 1044
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8480) - mean (268ms)  : 264, 273
    master - mean (296ms)  : 290, 303

    section Bailout
    This PR (8480) - mean (268ms)  : 265, 271
    master - mean (298ms)  : 292, 305

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8480) - mean (1,133ms)  : 1095, 1171
    master - mean (1,175ms)  : 1140, 1210
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8480) - mean (266ms)  : 262, 270
    master - mean (295ms)  : 287, 304

    section Bailout
    This PR (8480) - mean (265ms)  : 262, 269
    master - mean (295ms)  : 288, 302

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8480) - mean (1,022ms)  : 977, 1068
    master - mean (1,070ms)  : 1000, 1140
Loading

@pr-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

pr-commenter bot commented Apr 18, 2026

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-04-18 00:58:50

Comparing candidate commit caecce0 in PR branch dudik/probes-global-rate-limit with baseline commit dc15c79 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 26 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 87 known flaky benchmarks.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-4887.556op/s; -4687.314op/s] or [-5.579%; -5.351%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.005%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1142.827µs; -149.449µs] or [-0.568%; -0.074%]
  • ignore throughput [+502.658op/s; +1043.250op/s] or [+0.596%; +1.237%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1.680ms; +5.656ms] or [-0.838%; +2.822%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+7471.472op/s; +10718.912op/s] or [+6.280%; +9.010%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.007%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-29.626ms; -11.591ms] or [-14.901%; -5.830%]
  • ignore throughput [+257.183op/s; +1437.297op/s] or [+0.261%; +1.461%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+29 bytes; +30 bytes] or [+0.906%; +0.919%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.878ms; +309.469ms] or [+151.291%; +153.569%]
  • ignore throughput [+17.837op/s; +21.697op/s] or [+3.209%; +3.904%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.009%; +0.002%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+380.110ms; +382.278ms] or [+300.310%; +302.023%]
  • ignore throughput [+8.699op/s; +11.966op/s] or [+1.147%; +1.578%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.009%; +0.002%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+396.178ms; +398.893ms] or [+350.603%; +353.005%]
  • ignore throughput [-5.201op/s; -0.513op/s] or [-0.735%; -0.072%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.529%; +27.541%]
  • ignore execution_time [-218.711µs; +391.809µs] or [-0.109%; +0.196%]
  • ignore throughput [-4642.526op/s; -4275.656op/s] or [-3.612%; -3.327%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.977%; +9.987%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.326ms; -11.093ms] or [-7.158%; -5.181%]
  • ignore throughput [+3383.822op/s; +6198.577op/s] or [+2.470%; +4.525%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.502%; +27.510%]
  • ignore execution_time [-10.961ms; -6.821ms] or [-5.219%; -3.248%]
  • ignore throughput [-1736.835op/s; +541.913op/s] or [-1.570%; +0.490%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.746%; +105.759%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1152.380µs; -574.140µs] or [-0.574%; -0.286%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-244593.409op/s; -238418.082op/s] or [-24.974%; -24.344%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.558%; +38.566%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.141ms; -21.246ms] or [-11.658%; -9.475%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-70550.782op/s; -47399.815op/s] or [-7.537%; -5.064%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.292%; +105.304%]
  • ignore execution_time [-0.484ms; +3.852ms] or [-0.241%; +1.923%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-137951.281op/s; -121856.790op/s] or [-19.821%; -17.508%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1056.565µs; -4.567µs] or [-0.527%; -0.002%]
  • ignore throughput [-1981.509op/s; -1124.304op/s] or [-1.334%; -0.757%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [-916.109µs; +2587.022µs] or [-0.462%; +1.305%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+9623.394op/s; +12537.104op/s] or [+6.123%; +7.977%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.621ms; +5.611ms] or [+0.827%; +2.860%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+8085.599op/s; +10743.057op/s] or [+6.441%; +8.558%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [-325.214µs; -107.793µs] or [-0.162%; -0.054%]
  • ignore throughput [+48555.648op/s; +80642.253op/s] or [+1.477%; +2.453%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [-2.461ms; -1.325ms] or [-1.217%; -0.655%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+410583.778op/s; +444108.384op/s] or [+13.691%; +14.808%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.004%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-19.703ms; -15.315ms] or [-9.082%; -7.060%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+200632.977op/s; +254804.231op/s] or [+7.964%; +10.114%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.001%; +0.007%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.480ms; +300.361ms] or [+149.640%; +150.080%]
  • ignore throughput [+168.224op/s; +185.929op/s] or [+1.858%; +2.054%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.008%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.127ms; +304.265ms] or [+151.859%; +153.441%]
  • ignore throughput [+317.488op/s; +526.702op/s] or [+2.428%; +4.028%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.008%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.532ms; +302.991ms] or [+151.385%; +152.623%]
  • ignore throughput [+123.486op/s; +249.826op/s] or [+1.192%; +2.412%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+2 bytes; +3 bytes] or [+0.137%; +0.150%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.066ms; +297.905ms] or [+145.907%; +146.319%]
  • ignore throughput [+4.960op/s; +12.088op/s] or [+0.131%; +0.320%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.009%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.741ms; +300.661ms] or [+145.555%; +146.982%]
  • ignore throughput [+58.540op/s; +101.625op/s] or [+0.850%; +1.476%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.009%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.058ms; +300.615ms] or [+149.469%; +150.247%]
  • ignore throughput [+62.276op/s; +84.751op/s] or [+1.236%; +1.682%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [+5.498µs; +9.966µs] or [+1.129%; +2.046%]
  • ignore throughput [-40.561op/s; -22.499op/s] or [-1.976%; -1.096%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.000%; +0.010%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+24.382µs; +52.432µs] or [+5.592%; +12.025%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-250.153op/s; -126.477op/s] or [-10.876%; -5.499%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [+9.830µs; +31.834µs] or [+2.106%; +6.820%]
  • ignore throughput [-155.463op/s; -74.512op/s] or [-7.176%; -3.440%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-3.835µs; +0.269µs] or [-1.035%; +0.073%]
  • ignore throughput [-1.081op/s; +28.264op/s] or [-0.040%; +1.047%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.007%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+25.620µs; +49.245µs] or [+8.179%; +15.721%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-454.819op/s; -256.045op/s] or [-14.178%; -7.982%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [-13.948µs; +8.424µs] or [-3.816%; +2.305%]
  • ignore throughput [-96.526op/s; +36.988op/s] or [-3.464%; +1.327%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.831ms; +300.512ms] or [+149.646%; +149.986%]
  • ignore throughput [-10990927.871op/s; -3820578.347op/s] or [-5.506%; -1.914%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+77 bytes; +79 bytes] or [+0.431%; +0.442%]
  • unstable execution_time [+306.861ms; +358.244ms] or [+333.417%; +389.247%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1118.711op/s; +1270.241op/s] or [+9.193%; +10.438%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+20 bytes; +22 bytes] or [+0.099%; +0.110%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+365.367ms; +369.683ms] or [+277.419%; +280.697%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+718.712op/s; +918.370op/s] or [+6.958%; +8.890%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+2.704KB; +2.709KB] or [+4.804%; +4.813%]
  • unstable execution_time [+394.250ms; +480.573ms] or [+181.273%; +220.963%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-590.036op/s; -525.836op/s] or [-53.463%; -47.646%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1.271KB; -1.268KB] or [-2.998%; -2.992%]
  • unstable execution_time [+199.821ms; +333.018ms] or [+85.155%; +141.918%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-742.645op/s; -659.237op/s] or [-49.535%; -43.971%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-42 bytes; -38 bytes] or [-0.099%; -0.092%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+338.339ms; +344.886ms] or [+202.366%; +206.282%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-418.647op/s; -383.645op/s] or [-29.150%; -26.713%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-62.182µs; -37.771µs] or [-3.129%; -1.901%]
  • ignore throughput [+10.332op/s; +16.630op/s] or [+2.053%; +3.305%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [+28.397µs; +44.265µs] or [+1.951%; +3.041%]
  • ignore throughput [-19.864op/s; -12.724op/s] or [-2.891%; -1.852%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-144.427µs; -27.945µs] or [-5.024%; -0.972%]
  • ignore throughput [+5.683op/s; +27.177op/s] or [+1.634%; +7.812%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-11.447µs; -6.167µs] or [-0.989%; -0.533%]
  • ignore throughput [+4.719op/s; +8.665op/s] or [+0.546%; +1.003%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-109.463µs; -73.812µs] or [-10.152%; -6.846%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+74.873op/s; +116.520op/s] or [+8.073%; +12.563%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [+34.520µs; +95.083µs] or [+1.849%; +5.094%]
  • ignore throughput [-28.139op/s; +5.547op/s] or [-5.252%; +1.035%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-43 bytes; +21 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [+5.640µs; +17.065µs] or [+0.220%; +0.667%]
  • ignore throughput [-2.537op/s; -0.822op/s] or [-0.649%; -0.210%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-38 bytes; +46 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.007%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-168.347µs; -133.274µs] or [-8.528%; -6.751%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+38.447op/s; +47.602op/s] or [+7.590%; +9.397%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-42 bytes; +23 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [-127.469µs; -78.335µs] or [-3.233%; -1.987%]
  • ignore throughput [+5.494op/s; +8.603op/s] or [+2.167%; +3.393%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.001%; +0.008%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.961ms; +305.621ms] or [+153.069%; +153.905%]
  • ignore throughput [+2250.483op/s; +4014.612op/s] or [+0.724%; +1.292%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.111ms; +303.826ms] or [+151.388%; +152.248%]
  • ignore throughput [+16881.411op/s; +20487.419op/s] or [+2.662%; +3.230%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.217ms; +304.646ms] or [+151.319%; +153.041%]
  • ignore throughput [+7648.443op/s; +15379.979op/s] or [+1.611%; +3.240%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.193ms; +304.063ms] or [+151.751%; +152.690%]
  • ignore throughput [+780.888op/s; +3233.841op/s] or [+0.262%; +1.083%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.785ms; +299.558ms] or [+147.242%; +148.118%]
  • ignore throughput [+10460.071op/s; +16443.580op/s] or [+1.685%; +2.649%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.991ms; +306.460ms] or [+153.569%; +155.327%]
  • ignore throughput [+4208.822op/s; +12770.704op/s] or [+0.909%; +2.758%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +1 bytes] or [+0.108%; +0.119%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.839ms; +302.477ms] or [+150.994%; +151.816%]
  • ignore throughput [+7063.048op/s; +9055.838op/s] or [+1.832%; +2.349%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.756ms; +301.207ms] or [+148.903%; +150.124%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+46330.633op/s; +52807.843op/s] or [+9.200%; +10.486%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.947ms; +302.309ms] or [+149.221%; +150.396%]
  • ignore throughput [-9190.899op/s; -3919.332op/s] or [-2.176%; -0.928%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1.561ms; -0.709ms] or [-0.776%; -0.353%]
  • ignore throughput [-9952.411op/s; -8843.952op/s] or [-4.002%; -3.556%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.003%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-17.003ms; -13.359ms] or [-7.907%; -6.212%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+22053.281op/s; +28682.480op/s] or [+6.050%; +7.868%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [-0.216ms; +3.705ms] or [-0.108%; +1.859%]
  • ignore throughput [+1240.644op/s; +6893.209op/s] or [+0.453%; +2.516%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-4.459KB; -4.431KB] or [-1.623%; -1.613%]
  • unstable execution_time [+11.751µs; +53.074µs] or [+2.903%; +13.110%]
  • ignore throughput [-274.072op/s; -67.426op/s] or [-11.029%; -2.713%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-16.341KB; -16.320KB] or [-5.961%; -5.953%]
  • unstable execution_time [-24.549µs; +27.894µs] or [-4.852%; +5.513%]
  • ignore throughput [-101.318op/s; +81.045op/s] or [-5.056%; +4.044%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+627 bytes; +643 bytes] or [+0.229%; +0.235%]
  • ignore execution_time [-62.669µs; -6.270µs] or [-10.860%; -1.087%]
  • ignore throughput [+34.973op/s; +189.895op/s] or [+1.998%; +10.849%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-2 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [+0.388µs; +1.942µs] or [+0.673%; +3.365%]
  • ignore throughput [-538.686op/s; -103.884op/s] or [-3.108%; -0.599%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-4 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.010%; -0.001%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+6.142µs; +10.068µs] or [+14.519%; +23.798%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-4628.174op/s; -2868.254op/s] or [-19.483%; -12.074%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1 bytes; +1 bytes] or [-0.002%; +0.002%]
  • unstable execution_time [-13.287µs; -5.879µs] or [-20.614%; -9.122%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1526.272op/s; +3091.859op/s] or [+9.364%; +18.970%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+3 bytes; +4 bytes] or [+0.084%; +0.094%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.184ms; +304.413ms] or [+153.246%; +153.867%]
  • ignore throughput [-146.172op/s; -123.218op/s] or [-2.442%; -2.059%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.404ms; +305.521ms] or [+154.432%; +155.509%]
  • ignore throughput [-259.969op/s; -183.782op/s] or [-3.224%; -2.279%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.659ms; +303.632ms] or [+150.517%; +152.005%]
  • ignore throughput [-226.872op/s; -154.656op/s] or [-2.890%; -1.970%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • ignore execution_time [-149.405µs; +615.492µs] or [-0.074%; +0.307%]
  • ignore throughput [+270.417op/s; +2879.127op/s] or [+0.075%; +0.797%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-553.275µs; +252.783µs] or [-0.277%; +0.126%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+52501.871op/s; +56317.931op/s] or [+9.938%; +10.660%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.531ms; +5.206ms] or [+0.776%; +2.639%]
  • ignore throughput [+800.368op/s; +8990.837op/s] or [+0.189%; +2.128%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.268ms; +303.132ms] or [+150.155%; +151.084%]
  • ignore throughput [-2858.348op/s; -1861.195op/s] or [-1.887%; -1.229%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+0.000%; +0.009%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.375ms; +302.712ms] or [+151.336%; +152.007%]
  • ignore throughput [-2029.503op/s; -712.252op/s] or [-0.883%; -0.310%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.003%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.379ms; +305.906ms] or [+153.854%; +155.136%]
  • ignore throughput [+2304.531op/s; +4575.287op/s] or [+1.298%; +2.577%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.142ms; +300.946ms] or [+149.713%; +150.114%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+61047483.165op/s; +61311788.825op/s] or [+44.459%; +44.651%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+74 bytes; +76 bytes] or [+0.435%; +0.445%]
  • unstable execution_time [+381.594ms; +410.890ms] or [+474.580%; +511.014%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1060.598op/s; +1232.715op/s] or [+8.199%; +9.529%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.566ms; +300.479ms] or [+149.417%; +149.872%]
  • ignore throughput [+1630339.289op/s; +2568239.593op/s] or [+0.722%; +1.138%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [+100.084µs; +733.889µs] or [+0.050%; +0.367%]
  • ignore throughput [-7475.965op/s; -3404.319op/s] or [-0.834%; -0.380%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-4.969ms; -3.645ms] or [-2.434%; -1.785%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+98224.492op/s; +108511.039op/s] or [+9.171%; +10.131%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [+0.271ms; +4.381ms] or [+0.137%; +2.217%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+49593.484op/s; +68756.255op/s] or [+5.740%; +7.958%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.000%; +0.009%]
  • ignore execution_time [+0.810ms; +1.414ms] or [+0.405%; +0.707%]
  • ignore throughput [-32405.754op/s; -29143.251op/s] or [-2.966%; -2.668%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [+6.029ms; +10.251ms] or [+3.141%; +5.341%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+73027.386op/s; +104257.362op/s] or [+5.652%; +8.070%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.001%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [-4.048ms; -2.654ms] or [-1.989%; -1.304%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+75257.582op/s; +83798.092op/s] or [+7.474%; +8.322%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.002%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1224.950µs; -28.676µs] or [-0.610%; -0.014%]
  • ignore throughput [+10118.385op/s; +13308.150op/s] or [+2.254%; +2.965%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.009%]
  • ignore execution_time [-261.515µs; +1159.891µs] or [-0.131%; +0.579%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+56103.533op/s; +60929.083op/s] or [+10.187%; +11.064%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1774.457µs; +2403.979µs] or [-0.892%; +1.208%]
  • ignore throughput [+20179.441op/s; +30302.765op/s] or [+4.517%; +6.783%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [-714.583µs; +280.209µs] or [-0.356%; +0.140%]
  • ignore throughput [-30345.367op/s; -23878.705op/s] or [-4.441%; -3.495%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-878.917µs; +2653.644µs] or [-0.440%; +1.327%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+55397.159op/s; +73407.362op/s] or [+6.189%; +8.201%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.468ms; +8.073ms] or [+0.746%; +4.100%]
  • ignore throughput [+16109.836op/s; +35120.018op/s] or [+2.249%; +4.904%]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area:debugger

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@dudikeleti