chore(openfeature): update node server provider to 2.0.1

[leoromanovsky]

Motivation

@datadog/openfeature-node-server@2.0.0 reports TARGETING_MATCH for ordinary unsharded static allocations. The canonical cross-SDK result is STATIC. The 2.0.1 evaluator also distinguishes shard selection as SPLIT, rule matches as TARGETING_MATCH, and date-gated fallback as DEFAULT.

Version 2.0.1 also adds @datadog/js-core from DataDog/browser-sdk to the Node dependency tree through both flagging-core and openfeature-node-server. That dependency is not acceptable for dd-trace-js.

Blocked on DataDog/openfeature-js-client#342 and a clean patch release without browser SDK dependencies.

Changes

• Update @datadog/openfeature-node-server from 2.0.0 to 2.0.1.
• Refresh the flagging-core dependency graph.
• Register the generated @datadog/js-core license entry required by the current 2.0.1 graph.

Decisions

• Keep this PR in draft.
• Do not merge a provider version that installs @datadog/js-core.
• Replace 2.0.1 with the first clean patch released from openfeature-js-client#342 and remove the license entry before merge.

[dd-octo-sts]

Overall package size

Self size: 7.51 MB
Deduped: 8.17 MB
No deduping: 8.17 MB

Dependency sizes

| name | version | self size | total size | |------|---------|-----------|------------| | import-in-the-middle | 3.3.2 | 124.41 kB | 440.65 kB | | opentracing | 0.14.7 | 194.81 kB | 194.81 kB | | dc-polyfill | 0.1.11 | 25.74 kB | 25.74 kB |

_{🤖 This report was automatically generated by heaviest-objects-in-the-universe}

[datadog-prod-us1-5]

🎉 All green!

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 98.44% (+8.48%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: c60c270 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-07-22 04:50:47

Comparing candidate commit c60c270 in PR branch leo.romanovsky/ffl-2697-openfeature-node-server-2.0.1 with baseline commit 293cf61 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 2307 metrics, 51 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

• 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
• 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Unstable benchmarks

These benchmarks have a confidence interval too wide to call a change; treat them as noise rather than signal.

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-24

• unstable execution_time [-211.802ms; +203.149ms] or [-7.911%; +7.588%]

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-26

• unstable execution_time [-237.624ms; +231.379ms] or [-9.286%; +9.042%]

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-with-attacks-24

• unstable execution_time [-152.405ms; +161.521ms] or [-4.915%; +5.209%]

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-with-attacks-26

• unstable execution_time [-189612.921µs; +190929.021µs] or [-6.508%; +6.554%]

scenario:appsec-control-20

• unstable execution_time [-118.939ms; +128.209ms] or [-7.201%; +7.762%]

scenario:appsec-control-24

• unstable execution_time [-112505.686µs; +110741.086µs] or [-9.050%; +8.908%]

scenario:appsec-control-26

• unstable execution_time [-127.018ms; +123.531ms] or [-10.238%; +9.957%]

scenario:appsec-iast-no-vulnerability-control-20

• unstable execution_time [-17.363ms; +14.386ms] or [-6.724%; +5.571%]

scenario:appsec-iast-no-vulnerability-iast-enabled-always-active-20

• unstable execution_time [-17.007ms; +10.224ms] or [-6.603%; +3.970%]

scenario:appsec-iast-no-vulnerability-iast-enabled-default-config-20

• unstable execution_time [-16.823ms; +19.590ms] or [-6.274%; +7.306%]

scenario:appsec-iast-with-vulnerability-iast-enabled-default-config-20

• unstable execution_time [-25.613ms; +35.074ms] or [-4.687%; +6.419%]

scenario:child_process-shell-string-24

• unstable cpu_usage_percentage [-6.059%; +4.368%]
• unstable execution_time [-17.345ms; +25.095ms] or [-5.340%; +7.726%]
• unstable throughput [-226757.669op/s; +158482.580op/s] or [-6.271%; +4.383%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-minimal-24

• unstable cpu_user_time [-2763.415ms; +2786.978ms] or [-31.141%; +31.407%]
• unstable execution_time [-2761.881ms; +2828.685ms] or [-28.840%; +29.537%]
• unstable instructions [-23751.1M instructions; +23859.2M instructions] or [-32.654%; +32.803%]
• unstable max_rss_usage [-11116.038KB; +11608.038KB] or [-6.972%; +7.281%]
• unstable throughput [-762.668op/s; +723.746op/s] or [-21.711%; +20.603%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-minimal-26

• unstable cpu_user_time [-2.695s; +5.729s] or [-25.997%; +55.261%]
• unstable execution_time [-2.672s; +5.732s] or [-24.096%; +51.692%]
• unstable instructions [-24.1G instructions; +51.0G instructions] or [-27.677%; +58.600%]
• unstable max_rss_usage [-8.052MB; +17.896MB] or [-4.963%; +11.031%]
• unstable throughput [-1117.321op/s; +522.026op/s] or [-36.515%; +17.060%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-without-snapshot-24

• unstable cpu_user_time [-1737.677ms; +570.417ms] or [-21.061%; +6.914%]
• unstable execution_time [-1769.116ms; +552.267ms] or [-19.717%; +6.155%]
• unstable instructions [-15.0G instructions; +4.8G instructions] or [-22.164%; +7.116%]
• unstable throughput [-146.402op/s; +478.440op/s] or [-3.988%; +13.034%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-without-snapshot-26

• unstable cpu_user_time [-3.567s; +0.484s] or [-34.538%; +4.688%]
• unstable execution_time [-3.571s; +0.484s] or [-32.252%; +4.368%]
• unstable instructions [-31.7G instructions; +4.2G instructions] or [-36.545%; +4.868%]
• unstable throughput [-99.631op/s; +702.939op/s] or [-3.249%; +22.923%]

scenario:dogstatsd-aggregated-26

• unstable cpu_user_time [-64.548ms; +103.456ms] or [-6.460%; +10.353%]
• unstable execution_time [-88.787ms; +91.431ms] or [-8.631%; +8.888%]
• unstable throughput [-957041.589op/s; +954208.478op/s] or [-6.451%; +6.432%]

scenario:dogstatsd-with-tags-20

• unstable cpu_user_time [-329.932ms; +334.801ms] or [-6.983%; +7.086%]
• unstable execution_time [-321.299ms; +335.736ms] or [-6.697%; +6.998%]
• unstable throughput [-119932.474op/s; +113587.483op/s] or [-6.856%; +6.494%]

scenario:plugin-aws-sdk-lambda-inject-with-context-24

• unstable cpu_user_time [-191.653ms; +241.756ms] or [-5.026%; +6.339%]
• unstable execution_time [-191.326ms; +241.559ms] or [-4.985%; +6.294%]
• unstable throughput [-29295.678op/s; +23820.201op/s] or [-5.589%; +4.544%]

scenario:plugin-claude-agent-sdk-compact-stream-scan-24

• unstable cpu_usage_percentage [-5.923%; +4.389%]

scenario:plugin-graphql-long-with-depth-and-collapse-off-20

• unstable max_rss_usage [-31.040MB; +35.964MB] or [-7.816%; +9.056%]

scenario:plugin-graphql-long-with-depth-on-max-20

• unstable cpu_user_time [-609.395ms; +555.374ms] or [-5.266%; +4.799%]
• unstable execution_time [-621.839ms; +567.056ms] or [-5.266%; +4.802%]
• unstable throughput [-3.304op/s; +3.624op/s] or [-4.850%; +5.318%]

scenario:plugin-memcached-hashring-24

• unstable cpu_user_time [-1345.571ms; +497.204ms] or [-44.672%; +16.507%]
• unstable execution_time [-1348.203ms; +504.993ms] or [-44.556%; +16.689%]
• unstable instructions [-9.9G instructions; +3.2G instructions] or [-26.658%; +8.666%]
• unstable throughput [-898505.239op/s; +1394545.472op/s] or [-6.224%; +9.660%]

scenario:test-optimization-large-suite-20

• unstable max_rss_usage [-5213.128KB; +6917.795KB] or [-6.368%; +8.450%]

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.44%. Comparing base (293cf61) to head (c60c270).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9480      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.96%   98.44%   +8.47%     
==========================================
  Files         912      943      +31     
  Lines      124415   127257    +2842     
  Branches     8829    11001    +2172     
==========================================
+ Hits       111930   125275   +13345     
+ Misses      12485     1982   -10503     

Flag	Coverage Δ
aiguard	57.84% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️
aiguard-integration	56.23% <ø> (ø)
apm-bucket-0	57.69% <ø> (-3.47%)	⬇️
apm-bucket-1	64.00% <ø> (+1.38%)	⬆️
apm-bucket-2	62.75% <ø> (?)
apm-bucket-3	60.12% <ø> (?)
apm-capabilities-tracing	64.49% <ø> (ø)
apm-integrations-aerospike	56.70% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
apm-integrations-confluentinc-kafka-javascript	61.60% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️
apm-integrations-couchbase	57.14% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
apm-integrations-http	62.78% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
apm-integrations-kafkajs	62.19% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
apm-integrations-next	59.24% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
apm-integrations-prisma	58.72% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
apm-integrations-sharedb_integrations-tedious	?
appsec	72.95% <ø> (+0.04%)	⬆️
appsec-express_fastify_graphql	70.42% <ø> (?)
appsec-integration	51.38% <ø> (?)
appsec-kafka_ldapjs_lodash	63.99% <ø> (?)
appsec-mongodb-core_mongoose_mysql	67.72% <ø> (?)
appsec-next	57.55% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
appsec-node-serialize	?
appsec-node-serialize_passport_postgres	67.39% <ø> (?)
appsec-passport	?
appsec-sourcing_stripe_template	65.73% <ø> (?)
debugger	64.92% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-0	51.67% <ø> (-0.51%)	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-1	60.25% <ø> (-0.92%)	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-10	61.82% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-11	56.73% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-12	52.03% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-13	52.05% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-2	53.36% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-3	53.65% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-4	59.24% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-5	50.06% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-6	60.96% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-7	58.39% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-8	59.48% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-9	52.04% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-instrumentation-couchbase	51.10% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
instrumentations-instrumentation-router	?
instrumentations-instrumentation-zlib	51.70% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-integration-esbuild	34.11% <ø> (ø)
llmobs-ai_anthropic_bedrock	62.59% <ø> (?)
llmobs-bucket-1	61.56% <ø> (?)
llmobs-openai	62.72% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️
llmobs-sdk	66.22% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
llmobs-vertex-ai	59.21% <ø> (?)
master-coverage	98.44% <ø> (?)
openfeature	56.20% <ø> (+0.19%)	⬆️
openfeature-unit	53.47% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
platform-core_esbuild_instrumentations-misc	40.41% <ø> (?)
platform-integration	61.50% <ø> (ø)
platform-shimmer_unit-guardrails_webpack	39.11% <ø> (?)
platform-unit-guardrails	?
plugins-axios_body-parser_bullmq	?
plugins-bucket-0	57.10% <ø> (?)
plugins-bucket-1	54.43% <ø> (?)
plugins-bucket-11	62.34% <ø> (?)
plugins-bucket-14	?
plugins-bucket-15	?
plugins-bucket-16	?
plugins-bucket-17	?
plugins-bucket-18	62.03% <ø> (?)
plugins-bucket-19	60.12% <ø> (?)
plugins-bucket-2	?
plugins-bucket-20	62.13% <ø> (?)
plugins-bucket-4	58.62% <ø> (?)
plugins-bullmq_cassandra_cookie	61.82% <ø> (?)
plugins-cassandra_cookie_cookie-parser	?
plugins-cookie-parser_crypto_dd-trace-api	56.80% <ø> (?)
plugins-fastify_fetch_fs	?
plugins-fetch_fs_generic-pool	58.84% <ø> (?)
plugins-generic-pool_grpc_handlebars	?
plugins-google-cloud-pubsub_grpc_handlebars	64.76% <ø> (?)
plugins-hapi_hono_ioredis	60.29% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
plugins-jest_knex_langgraph	55.67% <ø> (?)
plugins-jest_knex_ldapjs	?
plugins-ldapjs_light-my-request_limitd-client	58.57% <ø> (?)
plugins-light-my-request_limitd-client_lodash	?
plugins-lodash_mariadb_memcached	58.07% <ø> (?)
plugins-mariadb_memcached_mercurius	?
plugins-microgateway-core_moleculer_mongodb	?
plugins-moleculer_mongodb_mongodb-core	61.98% <ø> (?)
plugins-mongodb-core_mongoose_multer	?
plugins-mongoose_multer_mysql	59.08% <ø> (?)
plugins-mysql2_nats_node-serialize	60.78% <ø> (?)
plugins-mysql_mysql2_nats	?
plugins-opensearch_passport-http_pino	59.61% <ø> (?)
plugins-passport-http_pino_postgres	?
plugins-postgres_process_pug	58.34% <ø> (?)
plugins-process_pug_redis	?
plugins-redis_router_sequelize	62.11% <ø> (?)
plugins-test-and-upstream-rhea_undici_url	61.69% <ø> (?)
plugins-url_valkey_vm	?
plugins-valkey_vm_winston	58.07% <ø> (?)
plugins-winston_ws	?
plugins-ws	59.66% <ø> (?)
profiling	62.22% <ø> (?)
serverless-aws-sdk-aws-sdk	55.13% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-bedrockruntime	54.82% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-client	56.49% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-dynamodb	55.73% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-eventbridge	49.44% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-kinesis	59.41% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-lambda	57.46% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-s3	55.67% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-serverless-peer-service	59.82% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-sns	60.21% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-sqs	60.63% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-stepfunctions	55.65% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-util	51.55% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
serverless-bucket-0	54.33% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
serverless-bucket-1	59.32% <ø> (+5.77%)	⬆️
test-optimization-cucumber	71.85% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️
test-optimization-cypress	65.81% <ø> (+0.07%)	⬆️
test-optimization-jest	73.23% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️
test-optimization-mocha	73.49% <ø> (+7.51%)	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-atr	60.39% <ø> (+0.53%)	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-efd	60.58% <ø> (+0.16%)	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-final-status	60.55% <ø> (+0.22%)	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-impacted-tests	60.28% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-reporting	61.56% <ø> (-0.13%)	⬇️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-test-management	61.09% <ø> (-0.13%)	⬇️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-test-span	60.49% <ø> (?)
test-optimization-selenium	60.03% <ø> (?)
test-optimization-testopt	58.47% <ø> (-1.89%)	⬇️
test-optimization-vitest	70.28% <ø> (+3.84%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.