Skip to content

Clarify BigQuery prereqs for Cloud Cost Management#38330

Merged
ashleyyip merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
ashley.yip/bigquery-ccm-prereqs
Jul 21, 2026
Merged

Clarify BigQuery prereqs for Cloud Cost Management#38330
ashleyyip merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
ashley.yip/bigquery-ccm-prereqs

Conversation

@ashleyyip

@ashleyyip ashleyyip commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do? What is the motivation?

In order for CCM to allocate BigQuery costs, we require Data Observability set up to access the usage data. This clarifies the setup needed in order to see BigQuery costs.

Merge readiness

  • Ready for merge

For Datadog employees:

  • ⚠️ Your branch name MUST follow the <name>/<description> convention and include the forward slash (/). If you've already created your PR with an incorrect branch name, please rename your branch and open a fresh PR.
  • 🤖 New: Comment with /review to run an automated check that catches common issues before a Documentation team member reviews your PR.

AI assistance

Additional notes

@datadog-prod-us1-4

This comment has been minimized.

@ashleyyip
ashleyyip force-pushed the ashley.yip/bigquery-ccm-prereqs branch from 07126d5 to 764abc9 Compare July 21, 2026 17:34
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Preview links (active after the build_preview check completes)

Modified Files

@ashleyyip
ashleyyip marked this pull request as ready for review July 21, 2026 18:32
@ashleyyip
ashleyyip requested review from a team as code owners July 21, 2026 18:32
@drichards-87 drichards-87 self-assigned this Jul 21, 2026
@drichards-87 drichards-87 removed their assignment Jul 21, 2026
@ashleyyip
ashleyyip merged commit da80445 into master Jul 21, 2026
23 of 25 checks passed
@ashleyyip
ashleyyip deleted the ashley.yip/bigquery-ccm-prereqs branch July 21, 2026 18:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants