Add tests for new feature API Endpoints: Business logic events for LLM-based SDKs

[estringana]

Motivation

This PR creates all required tests in order to fully test the new feature API Endpoints: Business logic events for LLM-based SDKs

You can find the RFC here RFC API Endpoints: Business logic events for LLM-based SDKs

Changes

Workflow

1. ⚠️ Create your PR as draft ⚠️
2. Work on you PR until the CI passes
3. Mark it as ready for review
   • Test logic is modified? -> Get a review from RFC owner.
   • Framework is modified, or non obvious usage of it -> get a review from R&P team

🚀 Once your PR is reviewed and the CI green, you can merge it!

🛟 #apm-shared-testing 🛟

Reviewer checklist

• Anything but tests/ or manifests/ is modified ? I have the approval from R&P team
• A docker base image is modified?
  • the relevant build-XXX-image label is present
• A scenario is added, removed or renamed?
  • Get a review from R&P team

[github-actions]

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

tests/appsec/api_security/test_endpoints.py                             @DataDog/asm-libraries @DataDog/system-tests-core
utils/build/docker/php/common/llm.php                                   @DataDog/apm-php @DataDog/system-tests-core
docs/weblog/end-to-end_weblog.md                                        @DataDog/system-tests-core
manifests/cpp.yml                                                       @DataDog/dd-trace-cpp
manifests/cpp_httpd.yml                                                 @DataDog/dd-trace-cpp
manifests/cpp_nginx.yml                                                 @DataDog/dd-trace-cpp
manifests/dotnet.yml                                                    @DataDog/apm-dotnet @DataDog/asm-dotnet
manifests/envoy.yml                                                     @DataDog/system-tests-core
manifests/golang.yml                                                    @DataDog/dd-trace-go-guild
manifests/haproxy.yml                                                   @DataDog/system-tests-core
manifests/java.yml                                                      @DataDog/asm-java @DataDog/apm-java
manifests/java_otel.yml                                                 @DataDog/system-tests-core
manifests/nodejs.yml                                                    @DataDog/dd-trace-js
manifests/php.yml                                                       @DataDog/apm-php @DataDog/asm-php
manifests/python.yml                                                    @DataDog/apm-python @DataDog/asm-python
manifests/ruby.yml                                                      @DataDog/ruby-guild @DataDog/asm-ruby
manifests/rust.yml                                                      @DataDog/apm-rust
tests/appsec/rasp/rasp_ruleset.json                                     @DataDog/asm-libraries @DataDog/system-tests-core
utils/_context/_scenarios/appsec_rasp.py                                @DataDog/system-tests-core
utils/_features.py                                                      @DataDog/system-tests-core
utils/build/docker/internal_server/app.py                               @DataDog/system-tests-core
utils/build/docker/php/apache-mod/php.conf                              @DataDog/apm-php @DataDog/system-tests-core
utils/build/docker/php/common/composer.json                             @DataDog/apm-php @DataDog/system-tests-core
utils/build/docker/php/php-fpm/php-fpm.conf                             @DataDog/apm-php @DataDog/system-tests-core

[estringana]

For now, LLM rules are not merged yet on appsec-event-rules repository. For that reason they are harcoded here but in the future they will be removed from here. You can see the PR where this rules have been copy from here https://github.com/DataDog/appsec-event-rules/pull/265

[estringana]

It does not belong to RASP but rasp scenarios for now are the ones which have a way of injecting harcoded rules. Once llm rules are merged we can revisit the right scenario for these tests. More info on this comment https://github.com/DataDog/system-tests/pull/6339/changes#r2827405239

[estringana]

is 543 the right number? No sure where I need to get it from

[cbeauchesne]

Close, but probably no : https://feature-parity.us1.prod.dog/#/?feature=543

I'm in Paris, we can meet to see how to play with the Feature Parity Dashboard

[estringana]

I'll be in Paris tomorrow. Let's meet

[datadog-datadog-prod-us1]

✅ Tests

🎉 All green!

❄️ No new flaky tests detected
🧪 All tests passed

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 4a7f6a5 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Was this helpful? Give us feedback!}