chore: dump Library metadata from /binaries/metadata.txt if available

[brettlangdon]

Motivation

When running CI against a GIT_REF like main for dd-trace-py it can be hard to know exactly which artifact was used for the tests.

This change will look for a possible /metadata.txt file if it exists in S3 and supports dumping the metadata both in install_ddtrace.sh, and when dumping container metadata when running tests.

Example PR/test run where it is difficult to understand the artifact:

https://github.com/DataDog/system-tests/actions/runs/24707739878/job/72305061453?pr=6721#step:34:22

This change will add dumping:

Library metadata:
commit_sha=dc5f4286e2de5be4c8ee74bba6523649b2690f74
commit_short_sha=dc5f4286
ref_name=brettlangdon/s3.metadata
pipeline_id=109300625
package_version=4.8.0rc5
created_at=2026-04-23T13:58:51Z

Changes

Workflow

1. ⚠️ Create your PR as draft ⚠️
2. Work on you PR until the CI passes
3. Mark it as ready for review
   • Test logic is modified? -> Get a review from RFC owner.
   • Framework is modified, or non obvious usage of it -> get a review from R&P team

🚀 Once your PR is reviewed and the CI green, you can merge it!

🛟 #apm-shared-testing 🛟

Reviewer checklist

• Anything but tests/ or manifests/ is modified ? I have the approval from R&P team
• A docker base image is modified?
  • the relevant build-XXX-image label is present
• A scenario is added, removed or renamed?
  • Get a review from R&P team

[github-actions]

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

utils/_context/containers.py                                            @DataDog/system-tests-core
utils/build/docker/python/install_ddtrace.sh                            @DataDog/apm-python @DataDog/asm-python @DataDog/system-tests-core

[datadog-datadog-prod-us1]

🎉 All green!

❄️ No new flaky tests detected
🧪 All tests passed

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 8ba3d84 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 812284eacc

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".