Skip to content

Add structured research directories and placeholder files#2

Merged
Devanik21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
add-structured-research-directories-5273888254561330482
Apr 19, 2026
Merged

Add structured research directories and placeholder files#2
Devanik21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
add-structured-research-directories-5273888254561330482

Conversation

@Devanik21
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Adds a formal directory structure typical of ML/VLSI research repositories along with many placeholder files covering documentation, scripts, tests, configuration, notebooks, etc., to improve repository structure. All original files were intentionally left untouched.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 5273888254561330482 started by @Devanik21

Created a formal ML/VLSI research folder structure (docs, notebooks, scripts, tests, data_processing, models, experiments, simulations, config, metadata, papers) and populated them with over 30 comprehensive, realistic placeholder files per user request. No original files were modified.

Co-authored-by: Devanik21 <162272415+Devanik21@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a machine learning framework for VLSI decoder optimization, covering data processing, surrogate model training, and evaluation. The review feedback highlights opportunities to improve code accuracy and performance, specifically by correcting a misleading docstring in the data loading utility and optimizing data splitting operations in the training and evaluation scripts to eliminate redundancy.

import pandas as pd

def load_dataset(filepath: str) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""Loads the CSV dataset and performs basic type checking."""
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The docstring mentions "basic type checking", but the implementation only performs a standard CSV load. Consider updating the docstring to accurately reflect the function's behavior or implementing the validation logic.

Suggested change
"""Loads the CSV dataset and performs basic type checking."""
"""Loads the CSV dataset."""

Comment on lines +16 to +22
y_power = df['power']
y_delay = df['delay']
y_area = df['area']

X_train, X_test, yp_train, yp_test = train_test_split(X, y_power, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)
_, _, yd_train, yd_test = train_test_split(X, y_delay, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)
_, _, ya_train, ya_test = train_test_split(X, y_area, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Multiple calls to train_test_split with the same random_state are redundant. It is more efficient to split the features and all target columns in a single operation, which also simplifies the code by removing the need for individual target variables before the split.

Suggested change
y_power = df['power']
y_delay = df['delay']
y_area = df['area']
X_train, X_test, yp_train, yp_test = train_test_split(X, y_power, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)
_, _, yd_train, yd_test = train_test_split(X, y_delay, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)
_, _, ya_train, ya_test = train_test_split(X, y_area, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)
y = df[['power', 'delay', 'area']]
X_train, X_test, y_train, _ = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)
yp_train, yd_train, ya_train = y_train['power'], y_train['delay'], y_train['area']


model = joblib.load(model_path)
y = df[target]
_, X_test, _, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Calling train_test_split inside the loop is inefficient as it re-partitions the data for every target. Consider moving the split operation outside the loop to improve performance.

@Devanik21 Devanik21 merged commit 216bf54 into main Apr 19, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant