some features i always have dreamt of

[purr]

been using fancywm for like 2 years now, there are some things that always annoyed me, so i used my cursor credits and wasted some time, instead of going outside, to make it perfect for my needs:

• annoying little menu at the top: can now be hidden
• closing fancywm scrambles windows: now keeps windows as-is
• need to "manually" create panels: now simple drag and drop with visual cues
• automatic panel creation being useless: now also dynamically creates stack panels (which also fixes the edge case when having too many windows open, that it will ALWAYS have space for ALL windows...as it's a stack)
• probably more stuff....? god knows

i tested the added features, they work fine :D
im unsure if this AI slop is ready to be pulled, but i think it gives a good base on what can be implemented...?
i wont be able to answer any code-related questions, because i am stupid :/
but hey....it WORKS!! ITS COOL!!!!

[github-actions]

Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. Like many open-source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution. You can sign the CLA by just posting a Pull Request Comment same as the below format.

---

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

---

_{You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request. Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.}

[Dan-Dandelion]

This is really cool. Thanks. One thing I'd like is dragging a window while holding alt disables the visual-cue-thing and only focuses on swapping windows. As an optional setting of course.

[veselink1]

Hey @purr thanks for this contribution. I am very busy with life things during month, but will definitely have a look as soon as is possible.

Since you say this is LLM-generated code, I wanted to know if you are prepared to make any changes to make this mergeable/maintainable or fix any bugs? Or is this code bring submitted as-is with expectation that I will make the changes before we are ready to merge? Also, can you share which LLM model you used?

[purr]

Hey @purr thanks for this contribution. I am very busy with life things during month, but will definitely have a look as soon as is possible.

Since you say this is LLM-generated code, I wanted to know if you are prepared to make any changes to make this mergeable/maintainable or fix any bugs? Or is this code bring submitted as-is with expectation that I will make the changes before we are ready to merge? Also, can you share which LLM model you used?

hi no worries and thank you
any future change from my side would be from AI still (yes, i am THAT retarded!), so im unsure if this would be feasible for the well-being of the project, but i wouldn't mind doing so, if that is wanted....
sooo ideally....a human should approve of it and make it fit for this project, i tested this on my win11 with no errors, though i saw it behaves a little bit differently on win10 (i was too lazy to get a win10 machine to test myself, which is why i didn't bother fixing these behavior things for my friend xd)
mostly, opus 4.6, but also cursor auto-mode (to save some money :c)

aaaaaand......'I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA'....let's hope it's signed now...by me adding this....