Skip to content

docs(opsx): fix /opsx:sync description and add detailed documentation#1061

Open
HowardYan888 wants to merge 2 commits into
Fission-AI:mainfrom
HowardYan888:fix-opsx-sync-description
Open

docs(opsx): fix /opsx:sync description and add detailed documentation#1061
HowardYan888 wants to merge 2 commits into
Fission-AI:mainfrom
HowardYan888:fix-opsx-sync-description

Conversation

@HowardYan888
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@HowardYan888 HowardYan888 commented May 7, 2026

Issue

The /opsx:sync command has inconsistent description and missing documentation in opsx.md:

  • Description uses "Sync" instead of "Merge" (inconsistent with other docs)
  • Description is unclear: "to main" vs "into main specs"
  • Missing detailed Usage section documentation

Changes

  1. Fixed command table description (line 167):

    • Before: "Sync delta specs to main (default workflow, optional)"
    • After: "Merge delta specs into main specs (optional)"
  2. Added detailed Usage section:

    • Explains what the command does
    • Lists when to use it
    • Provides context for users

Rationale

  • Consistency: Now matches commands.md and migration-guide.md
  • Clarity: "Merge" is more accurate than "Sync" for this operation
  • Completeness: Usage section now documents all commands in the table
  • User experience: Users can find detailed information in opsx.md

Impact

Documentation-only change, no functional impact.

Related

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Documentation
    • Updated /opsx:sync command details to clarify it merges delta specs into main specs and is optional.
    • Added a dedicated "Sync delta specs" section outlining command behavior, usage, and archiving prompts.

- Changed description from 'Sync delta specs to main' to 'Merge delta specs into main specs'

- Added detailed Usage section for /opsx:sync command

- Now consistent with commands.md and migration-guide.md

- Improves documentation completeness and clarity
@HowardYan888 HowardYan888 requested a review from TabishB as a code owner May 7, 2026 03:12
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented May 7, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0f3a45c0-7a6b-46e8-bb08-4602c3b75cb7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cbfb276 and 555eb74.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/opsx.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • docs/opsx.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated docs/opsx.md: the Commands table now describes /opsx:sync as merging delta specs into main specs and marks it optional; a new "Sync delta specs" Usage section documents command behavior, example, and when to use it.

Changes

Documentation Update: /opsx:sync Command

Layer / File(s) Summary
Commands table
docs/opsx.md (lines 164–166)
Commands table entry for /opsx:sync changed to "merges delta specs into main specs" and marked as optional instead of default.
Usage / Example
docs/opsx.md (lines 211–226)
New "Sync delta specs" section added with example /opsx:sync, details on merging delta specs into openspec/specs/, note that sync keeps specs active (non-archival), and guidance on when to use the command.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

codex

Suggested reviewers

  • TabishB
  • alfred-openspec

Poem

A rabbit hops through lines of text,
Merging deltas—what comes next?
Optional sync, gentle and bright,
Specs align by morning light. 🐰✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately and specifically describes the main changes: fixing the /opsx:sync command description and adding detailed documentation to docs/opsx.md.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@docs/opsx.md`:
- Around line 212-214: The fenced code block containing the command "/opsx:sync"
is missing a language identifier; update the fenced block around "/opsx:sync" to
include a language tag (e.g., change the fence to ```text) so markdownlint MD040
is satisfied and the lint warning is removed.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: d40a97e9-a63d-4b07-9243-1f1302ceb9b2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 053d8a5 and cbfb276.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/opsx.md

Comment thread docs/opsx.md Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant