Draft
Conversation
Existing Define §"defined before first use" check was weak on narrative ordering (a symbol could appear in algebra before its introducing paragraph) and silent on how implementers should evolve the canonical PLAN.md Notation Conventions table once planning is done. Task 4 closes both gaps: strengthens the ordering check in SKILL.md and adds an explicit inline-edit rule requiring the Notation Conventions table be updated BEFORE any newly introduced symbol appears in a derivation. Rolls back Execution-complete milestone and logs the researcher's scope decision in ## Decisions per handoff-doc User Decisions Log. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Strengthen the Define ordering check to require narrative-order introduction (no symbol appears before the paragraph/table that introduces it) and name PLAN.md's Notation Conventions table as the authoritative cross-task source for reused symbols. Add a new Documentation and handoff [BLOCKING] item requiring implementers to inline-edit the Notation Conventions table before using any newly introduced symbol in algebra, committed atomically with the derivation work. Mirror the update mechanism in references/planning.md Principles so the table reads as a living record, not a one-time planning artifact. Add one row to Common Rationalizations for the late-update failure mode. Minimum net diff: only the one pre-existing Define bullet is rewritten; one bullet is inserted into Documentation and handoff; one Common Rationalizations row is appended; one Principles bullet is added in the planning reference.
All four tasks APPROVED; tests/check-harness-compatibility.sh passes (including Codex generated-agent sync). Integration REVISE items on Tasks 2 and 3 are pre-existing and unaffected by Task 4. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ents Rebase onto current main inherited main's data-analysis-only direct-mode reference files. Regenerate from the rebased `agents/implementer.md` and `agents/reviewer.md` so the Domain Discipline section covers both data analysis and theory/modeling in line with the theory-modeling vertical.
- Log the 2026-04-23 rebase-onto-main decision in the Decisions section (dropped 34 objective-first commits; kept 17 theory-modeling commits). - Update Project Conventions HEAD pointer from the removed `7d8f123` to the current base `b6e0640`. - Remove the stale Tasks 2 and 3 integration review-notes blockquotes: both flagged scope creep from the now-dropped objective-first commits (missing files and release-ledger entry no longer exist on the rebased tree). Reset Integration status on both tasks to the pre-integration default so Phase B re-runs against the new base. - Refresh RESULTS.md header with the post-rebase status.
Cumulative integration review of the rebased theory-modeling branch (b6e0640..HEAD) against current main. All four tasks' integration status flipped to APPROVED: the cumulative diff is tightly scoped to theory-modeling wiring with no residue from the dropped objective-first commits, the derived-artifact coherence checks pass (codex custom agents and direct-mode refs both in sync with agents/*.md), harness compatibility passes end to end, and PLAN.md + RESULTS.md accurately describe the rebased-branch reality.
Phase B integration reviewer returned APPROVE on the cumulative b6e0640..HEAD diff (all four tasks' Integration status flipped to APPROVED in e0c18bb). Flip the `Refactored` workflow milestone accordingly, and fix the minor wording nit the reviewer flagged in the 2026-04-23 rebase decision entry (three → four conflict stops, matching the four resolved areas listed).
…lity Add Tasks 5 and 6. Task 5 rewrites the Iron Law to name stated intuition, replaces the Define-Derive-Validate section with a four-gate structure (Objects & Notation / Assumptions / Derivations / Verification & Rendering), and adds BLOCKING items for new-notation intuition, assumption interpretability, assumption synthesis, reason-per-derivation-step, and economic interpretation of limiting cases. Task 6 mirrors the framing into references/planning.md (Interpretation column on the Assumptions table, non-optional "Why this notation", intuition-failure mistakes and red flags) and references/ integration.md (BLOCKING items that intuition artifacts survive refactor). Roll back the project-level Refactored milestone so Phase B re-runs once Task 6 lands. Tasks 1-4 remain APPROVED because Task 4's narrative -ordering and atomic Notation-Conventions-update rules compose cleanly under the new structure. Researcher feedback: intuition and interpretability are the top modeling requirement and were treated as implicit in the D-D-V frame; the frame itself was a mechanical mirror of describe-analyze-validate.
…etability Replace Define-Derive-Validate with a four-gate structure (Objects & Notation / Assumptions / Derivations / Verification & Rendering) built around the reader's trust chain. Rewrite the Iron Law to name stated intuition and interpretable assumptions alongside defined objects. Add five new BLOCKING items (intuition/mnemonic per new symbol, plain-language assumption interpretation, prefer synthesis over scattered weak restrictions, reason per derivation move, economic interpretation of limiting cases) and four Common Rationalizations rows for the matching failure modes. All prior load-bearing BLOCKING / ADVISORY items relocated verbatim under the new gates; Task 4's narrative-ordering rule and atomic Notation-Conventions-table-update rule preserved intact.
…ng planning and integration references Task 5 restructured the SKILL.md around four gates and added five new [BLOCKING] items on intuition, assumption interpretability, assumption synthesis, per-step reason, and economic interpretation of special cases. The stage-scoped references still reflected the old frame. planning.md now records interpretability at planning time. The Assumptions table gains an Interpretation column with one concrete example row showing the target one-short-phrase shape. The Notation Conventions section explicitly requires "Why this notation" for non-conventional symbols. A new Principles bullet flags interpretability as blocking and synthesis as preferred, pointing at SKILL.md rather than restating its checklist. Common mistakes and Red Flags gain the three intuition-failure modes the implementer must not defer. integration.md §"Derivation discipline preserved through refactoring" gains three [BLOCKING] items verifying each new-symbol intuition, assumption interpretation, and per-step reason present in the original work survives refactor, pointing at the matching SKILL.md gate. Cleans up the two remaining Define-Derive-Validate mentions: planning.md §Handoff to Implementation now names the intuition + interpretability + stated reason through-line, and integration.md's verdict-protocol pointer now references ## The Four Gates. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Step 4 completion menu answered after Tasks 5 and 6 APPROVED — dispatch integration-workflow to re-run Phase B on the restructured skill, then docs finalization, then merge/PR. Drift tests remain skipped per the 2026-04-22 decision.
Merge main's 132-commit tighten-integration-rules restructure into the theory-modeling branch. Main split semantic-merge into core + three mode references, split result-protection out of refactor-and-integrate, folded codebase-integration and merge-quality content into the new owning skills, and reoriented refactor-and-integrate around minimum net diff. All theory-modeling artifacts survive; cross-skill pointers in theory-modeling/references/integrate-drift-tests.md and integration.md were retargeted to the new locations (result-protection/references/drift-test-quality.md; refactor-and-integrate/SKILL.md). Agent bodies adopted main's shorter teach-the-protocol wording — theory-modeling routing is preserved through the manifest. tests/check-harness-compatibility.sh updated to read the surviving files. Sync Map and task-local Sync impact annotations recorded in PLAN.md.
Add 872c4d8 (the SHA-recording commit) to the Sync Map's Sync commits field so the chain reflects every commit this sync landed, per semantic-merge §workflow-sync-author ("update Sync commits to list the full commit chain this mode landed"). Pure bookkeeping; no code or skill edits. All tests still pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…t mismatch Record sync-review REVISE with one MAJOR and two MINOR findings against the main-restructure sync cluster: Task 6's target integration.md was touched by the merge but has no task-local Sync impact annotation; Task 5 is listed under "affects Tasks" without a corresponding Sync impact or diff evidence; and the Sync commits field omits the chain-extension bookkeeping commit itself. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…from cluster, reject chain self-reference finding Address sync-review findings: - [MAJOR] Add Task 6 **Sync impact:** pointing at the two sync-origin hunks in skills/theory-modeling/references/integration.md (preamble retarget + verdict-protocol trailer) so the integration reviewer can classify them as sync-origin, not task work. - [MINOR] Drop Task 5 from the main-restructure cluster's affects list; sync diff did not touch Task 5's target SKILL.md and no task-local pointer is warranted. - [MINOR] Reject — self-reference cliff is accepted; chain now lists 4b3f9c1, 872c4d8, ecdd09d and stops, matching the tighten-integration-rules precedent. Flip Sync review status to IMPLEMENTED for narrow re-review.
…README/CATEGORIES; Tasks 1/3/5/6 APPROVED Post-sync integration review of the theory-modeling branch. Task 2 flagged REVISE for two `[BLOCKING]` Documentation Currency findings: `README.md:67` and `skills/CATEGORIES.md:25` still describe the theory-modeling flagship discipline as `Define–Derive–Validate`, which was superseded by the four-gate structure in the 2026-04-23 restructure (Tasks 5 and 6). Task 2 added those rows in commit `31bb0c2` and they were never refreshed when Task 5 landed, so contributor/runtime docs disagree with `using-superRA/SKILL.md:56` and `theory-modeling/SKILL.md`. Tasks 1, 3, 5, 6 APPROVED with dates stamped; Task 4 unchanged (no sync impact).
…ne rows to four-gate framing Addresses the two accepted integration-review findings (stale Define–Derive–Validate wording in README.md:67 and skills/CATEGORIES.md:25) by rewriting the theory-modeling row in both tables to match the four-gate structure already authoritative in skills/using-superRA/SKILL.md and skills/theory-modeling/SKILL.md. Also records Final Diff Self-Check trails against 886fda8..HEAD inside each in-scope task block (Tasks 1, 2, 3, 5, 6). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
… verified, all in-scope tasks APPROVED Narrow re-review of commit d6fc9ce against 886fda8..HEAD: - Task 2 items 1 and 2 (stale Define-Derive-Validate rows in README.md:67 and skills/CATEGORIES.md:25) verified fixed: both rows now use the four-gate framing (Objects & Notation, Assumptions, Derivations, Verification & Rendering) consistent with skills/using-superRA/SKILL.md:56 and skills/theory-modeling/SKILL.md. Row shape matches the adjacent econ-data-analysis row in both tables. Removed the now-empty Integration review notes blockquote and flipped Task 2 to Integration status: APPROVED (post-sync re-review 2026-04-24). - Final Diff Self-Check trails on Tasks 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 each name the governing command/range (git diff 886fda8..HEAD -- <paths>), record surviving-change classes (task objective, Sync impact, row rewrites this round), and state no suspicious hunks. Task 4 is out of scope (pre-sync APPROVED) and correctly carries no trail. - Branch-wide governing-diff sweep over git diff 886fda8..HEAD found no stray hunks — every touched file traces to a task objective, Sync impact, or generated-artifact regeneration. Overall verdict: APPROVE. All six task blocks now carry Integration status: APPROVED. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…k-local Sync impact Integration reviewer APPROVED all tasks on narrow re-review (commit 09048bc). Per integration-workflow §Integrate Step 5, close out Integrate by removing the temporary Sync Map section and task-local `**Sync impact:**` fields (no lasting task assumptions to preserve), and flipping the Refactored milestone in §Workflow Status.
User elected to open the PR before running the Document-phase doc-writer. RESULTS.md maturation and permanent relocation under docs/plans/ can land as a follow-up on the PR branch if reviewers need the record before merge.
FuZhiyu
force-pushed
the
superRA-model-skill
branch
from
16dcfe7 to
e70a68e
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds a first-class
superRA:theory-modelingdomain vertical for mathematical-modeling work, organized around intuition and interpretability as the through-line:skills/theory-modeling/with a restructured Iron Law ("NO MANIPULATION WITHOUT DEFINED OBJECTS, INTERPRETABLE ASSUMPTIONS, AND STATED INTUITION") and a four-gate shared checklist — Objects & Notation, Assumptions, Derivations, Verification & Rendering.planning.md,integrate-drift-tests.md,integration.mdwiring the vertical into thePLAN → IMPLEMENT → INTEGRATEworkflow.skills/using-superRA/SKILL.mdmanifest add-on,skills/planning-workflow/SKILL.mdrouting,skills/refactor-and-integrate/SKILL.mdintegration pointer,skills/handoff-doc/references/plan-anatomy.mdgeneralization,hooks/exit-plan-modereminder,.agents/skills/theory-modelingsymlink, andtests/check-harness-compatibility.shassertions.Workflow trail
Tasks 1–6 all Review status: APPROVED and Integration status: APPROVED per in-branch review cycles. Post-sync integration review re-run against current main (BASE 886fda8) — all six tasks APPROVED on the four-gate restructure, with two stale-row currency fixes (README.md, skills/CATEGORIES.md) landed in commit d6fc9ce. Sync APPROVED via semantic-merge workflow-sync mode.
Validation
Deferred
🤖 Generated with Claude Code