Conversation
Signed-off-by: Dhaval D <343411+ossdhaval@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhaval D <343411+ossdhaval@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduce tracking infrastructure for documentation by adding GitHub Actions workflow steps to fetch template overrides and conditionally enable tracking flags, a new HTML template for conditional tracking pixel and script inclusion, and configuration settings to control these features. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant GHA as GitHub Actions
participant Git as Git Repository
participant MkDocs as MkDocs Build
participant Template as HTML Template
participant Tracking as Tracking Services
GHA->>Git: Fetch template overrides from main
Git-->>GHA: main.html
GHA->>MkDocs: Update tracking flags in mkdocs.yml
Note over MkDocs: enable_scarf_pixel: true<br/>enable_reo_flag: true
GHA->>MkDocs: Build documentation
MkDocs->>Template: Render with config
Template->>Tracking: Conditionally include<br/>Scarf pixel & Reo script
Tracking-->>Template: Tracking loaded
Template-->>MkDocs: HTML generated
MkDocs->>GHA: Build complete
GHA->>Git: Deploy with mike
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In @.github/workflows/build-docs.yml:
- Around line 133-144: The workflow currently enables the Reo tracker by setting
enable_reo_flag: true (via the sed command that edits mkdocs.yml) but the
required asset docs/assets/js/reo.js is missing; either stop enabling the flag
or add the asset. Fix by removing or disabling the sed line that sets
enable_reo_flag: true in the build-docs workflow (the sed command referencing
enable_reo_flag) or, if you want tracking, add a valid docs/assets/js/reo.js
file to the repo (and ensure the git show origin/main:docs/assets/js/reo.js
reference will succeed) so the tracker script is present when the flag is
enabled.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: b6c1aba6-5c91-4555-affb-35b2b8bee690
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/build-docs.ymldocs/overrides/main.htmlmkdocs.yml
Signed-off-by: Dhaval D <343411+ossdhaval@users.noreply.github.com>
Added reo.dev tracker to the Flex documentation
Summary by CodeRabbit