Conversation
|
|
pyrooka
changed the title
…dentity templates Signed-off-by: Daniel Byrne <byrne.dan01@gmail.com>
Daniel-Byrne
force-pushed
the
policy-ref-mapping
branch
from
e09a6a4 to
318bd43
Compare
pyrooka
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 21, 2025
…Identity templates (#280) Signed-off-by: Daniel Byrne <byrne.dan01@gmail.com>
ibm-devx-sdk
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 21, 2025
## [0.68.4](0.68.3...0.68.4) (2025-07-21) ### Bug Fixes * **IAM Identity:** fix incorrect mapping of policy references in IAM Identity templates ([#280](#280)) ([06b0048](06b0048))
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR summary
Code does not exactly match API model, instances of
policy_template_refsneeded to be replaced withpolicy_template_referenecesPR Checklist
Please make sure that your PR fulfills the following requirements:
Current vs new behavior
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information