Open
Conversation
Signed-off-by: mayuka-c <Mayuka.C@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: mayuka-c <Mayuka.C@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: mayuka-c <Mayuka.C@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: mayuka-c <Mayuka.C@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: mayuka-c <Mayuka.C@ibm.com>
…n update Signed-off-by: mayuka-c <Mayuka.C@ibm.com>
mkumatag
reviewed
Apr 17, 2026
Signed-off-by: mayuka-c <Mayuka.C@ibm.com>
yussufsh
reviewed
Apr 20, 2026
Signed-off-by: mayuka-c <Mayuka.C@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: mayuka-c <Mayuka.C@ibm.com>
Member
Author
|
Have updated the description with recent updates done after today's internal squad discussion. PTAL |
Signed-off-by: Yussuf Shaikh <yussuf.shaikh1@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: mayuka-c <Mayuka.C@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: mayuka-c <Mayuka.C@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: mayuka-c <Mayuka.C@ibm.com>
mkumatag
requested changes
Apr 27, 2026
Signed-off-by: mayuka-c <Mayuka.C@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: mayuka-c <Mayuka.C@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: mayuka-c <Mayuka.C@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: mayuka-c <Mayuka.C@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: mayuka-c <Mayuka.C@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: mayuka-c <Mayuka.C@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: mayuka-c <Mayuka.C@ibm.com>
Member
|
Please convert all the text based diagrams to mermaid ones, it will be easy to view and update |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Copied mostly from the docs maintained in IBM box.
There will be changes on DB design like
PK for application table
Removal of architecture table
Removal of users table in accordance with storing in podman secrets.
Preferring to have seperate infra table. Reasons mentioned in the doc. I do have documented clubbing services and infra table into one single table with its Pros and Cons. Open for any suggestions :) -> Edit Based on todays meeting we go with 1:1 and stay with having only services table and later in next release we will go with separate ones.
API calls with appropriate endpoints, schema, implementation steps (For applications endpoints).