Skip to content

chore: explicitly define module distribution type in root package.json#735

Open
Rish-2006 wants to merge 1 commit into
Karanjot786:mainfrom
Rish-2006:patch-7
Open

chore: explicitly define module distribution type in root package.json#735
Rish-2006 wants to merge 1 commit into
Karanjot786:mainfrom
Rish-2006:patch-7

Conversation

@Rish-2006
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Rish-2006 Rish-2006 commented Jun 4, 2026

Closes #734

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated package configuration to use ES modules as the default module system.

@Rish-2006 Rish-2006 requested a review from Karanjot786 as a code owner June 4, 2026 17:40
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the type:devops +15 pts. CI, build, or release. label Jun 4, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 4, 2026

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: c4693169-bb7a-4e5a-9b25-ff34964d58bd

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f90f75c and 6ead488.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The root package.json now explicitly declares "type": "module", switching the package's default module mode to ES modules. This configuration change improves predictability for developers and bundlers interacting with the monorepo packages.

Changes

ES Module Type Declaration

Layer / File(s) Summary
ES module type field
package.json
The "type": "module" field is added to package.json to explicitly declare ES module distribution, replacing implicit module resolution with explicit configuration.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A single line, so clear and bright,
ES modules now set right,
No guessing games for bundlers true—
Explicit types in module's new.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The PR description is minimal, containing only a reference to the closed issue. It lacks required template sections like description, package details, and type of change. Complete the PR description by filling out required sections including a brief description of changes, which package(s) are affected, and the type of change (appears to be a chore/devops update).
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The PR title accurately describes the main change: explicitly defining the module distribution type in root package.json.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed The code change of adding "type": "module" to package.json directly addresses the linked issue #734's objective to explicitly define the module distribution type.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed The modification is narrowly scoped to the package.json module type field, which is directly related to the linked issue requirement with no extraneous changes.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type:devops +15 pts. CI, build, or release.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

chore: explicitly define module distribution type in root package.json

1 participant