fix(config): preserve valid fields during migration#893
Merged
XingYu-Zhong merged 3 commits intoJul 18, 2026
Merged
Conversation
2 tasks
XingYu-Zhong
approved these changes
Jul 18, 2026
XingYu-Zhong
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed against current develop after branch update. Scope is focused, the change remains needed, and no blocking issue was found. Required CI must pass before merge.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

Summary
Fix GUI-managed Kun config sanitization so one stale or unknown option cannot discard an otherwise valid config section. This closes the remaining failure mode behind #886 on older config files.
Scope
This PR is intentionally limited to preserving known valid fields while removing legacy fields. It is not a full schema-version migration; that remains a separate follow-up with its own backup, migration, and downgrade tests.
Changes
Tests
npm.cmd exec vitest run src/main/kun-process.test.ts npm.cmd run typecheck npm.cmd run lint -- --quiet npm.cmd run build git diff --checkResults: 45
kun-processtests passed; Typecheck, lint, build, and diff check passed locally.CI note
The previous GitHub run executed 55 tests successfully, then failed in the extension release gate while downloading the Electron binary (
TypeError: fetch failed/Electron failed to install correctly). No changed config code was involved. The next synchronized run should be used to revalidate the external download step.Issue
Part of #886