Add Mumbai to the list of cities in SearchBar#130
Open
AbhishekLambda wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Open
Add Mumbai to the list of cities in SearchBar#130AbhishekLambda wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
AbhishekLambda wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Contributor
GitHub Pages Preview
This preview updates automatically on each push. |
Collaborator
Author
|
@KaneAI validate this PR |
🚀 KaneAI Workflow Progress TrackerAutomated test case generation and execution for PR #130 🔄 Current StatusPR APPROVAL: Changes requested - some tests failed 📋 Test Cases
🧪 Test Run Management
📊 Reports
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | Last updated: 4/10/2026, 11:20:40 AM |
🧪 KaneAI Test Automation Progress📊 Test Authoring Status✅ All tests authored! 🔍 Test Case Details
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | Last updated: 4/10/2026, 11:14:54 AM |
🚀 KaneAI Test IntelligenceProject: KaneAI Generated | Generated: 4/10/2026, 11:15:00 AM 💡 Smart Test DiscoveryKaneAI has intelligently analyzed your PR changes and found existing test cases in your repository that are related to the files you've modified. This helps you:
📋 Related Test Cases in Your Repository
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | Last updated: 4/10/2026, 11:15:00 AM |
🚀 KaneAI - Test Execution Dashboard
🔍 Quick Access Links
⚡ Active HyperExecute Jobs
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | 4/10/2026, 11:17:59 AM |
![lambdatest-ai-cloud[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/2159106?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🔍 KaneAI - Test Execution Failed ❌
📊 Test Execution Summary
| 📊 Metric | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🧪 Total Tests | 2 |
| ✅ Passed | 0 |
| ❌ Failed | 2 |
| 📊 Success Rate | 0% |
| 🎯 Status | Failed |
🔍 Failed Tests Overview
| 📝 Test Title | 🔍 Root Cause | |
|---|---|---|
| Search for Mumbai as a Travel Destination | UI Data Defect | 🟡 medium |
| Search for a Location on the Travel Website | UI Data Defect | 🔴 high |
📋 Detailed Test Analysis
1. Search for Mumbai as a Travel Destination
| 📋 Property | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🎯 Status | ❌ Failed |
| ⭐ Priority | High |
| 🌍 Environment | Linux Config 1 |
| 🤖 Automation Status | Automated |
| 🆔 Test Case ID | 01KNVHBRXMW41M6WDH7JNSHQNB |
| 🔗 Test Results | View Details |
🔍 Root Cause Analysis:
- 📂 Category: UI Data Defect
- 📝 Summary: A test assertion that checks the 'Where' field for 'Mumbai' and the suggestions dropdown failed repeatedly even though the UI showed 'Mumbai' and the dropdown. This is likely a problem with the test's assertion logic or the way the test reads the stored value.
⚠️ Severity: medium
📈 Error Timeline:
| 🔢 Step | 📅 Timestamp | 🎯 Status | 📝 Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 🟢 I | The page heading 'Discover Your Perfect Getaway' was found and confirmed visible. |
| 2 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:10 AM | 🟢 I | The test typed 'Mumbai' into the Where input; vision checks confirmed the field contains 'Mumbai' and suggestions dropdown is visible. |
| 3 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:20 AM | 🔴 RC | The test assertion failed repeatedly: the test reported 'Assertion failed: Assert {{where_state}} contains Mumbai and suggestions visible' and retried multiple times before aborting. |
| 4 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:25 AM | 🟡 W | A higher-level wrapper raised 'Failed to execute action: ASSERTION ... Error: Assertion failed' after retries, causing the test to stop. |
2. Search for a Location on the Travel Website
| 📋 Property | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🎯 Status | ❌ Failed |
| ⭐ Priority | High |
| 🌍 Environment | Linux Config 1 |
| 🤖 Automation Status | Automated |
| 🆔 Test Case ID | 01KNVF0AWKCWNJKGEV1BWA1A25 |
| 🔗 Test Results | View Details |
🔍 Root Cause Analysis:
- 📂 Category: UI Data Defect
- 📝 Summary: The test failed because the site did not reach the expected homepage state — a 404 error page was visible instead of the landing page, causing the homepage_loaded assertion to fail.
⚠️ Severity: high
📈 Error Timeline:
| 🔢 Step | 📅 Timestamp | 🎯 Status | 📝 Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 🟢 I | Test opened the target site URL in Chrome. |
| 2 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:05 AM | 🔴 RC | Automated vision check did not find the expected heading; it detected a 404 error page instead. |
| 3 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:10 AM | 🟡 W | The test retried the homepage_loaded assertion several times but the page remained the 404 error page and the assertion kept failing. |
| 4 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:25 AM | 🟡 W | The test stopped after the assertion continued to fail and raised a runtime error indicating the assertion could not be satisfied. |
🔗 Test Run Dashboard
✅ RCA Analysis: Root cause analysis has been completed (2/2 RCAs found).
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | 4/10/2026, 11:23:02 AM
Collaborator
Author
|
@KaneAI validate this pr |
🚀 KaneAI Workflow Progress TrackerAutomated test case generation and execution for PR #130 🔄 Current StatusPR APPROVAL: Changes requested - some tests failed 📋 Test Cases
🧪 Test Run Management
📊 Reports
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | Last updated: 4/10/2026, 12:08:55 PM |
🧪 KaneAI Test Automation Progress📊 Test Authoring Status✅ All tests authored! 🔍 Test Case Details
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | Last updated: 4/10/2026, 11:59:32 AM |
🚀 KaneAI Test IntelligenceProject: KaneAI Generated | Generated: 4/10/2026, 11:59:38 AM 💡 Smart Test DiscoveryKaneAI has intelligently analyzed your PR changes and found existing test cases in your repository that are related to the files you've modified. This helps you:
📋 Related Test Cases in Your Repository
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | Last updated: 4/10/2026, 11:59:38 AM |
🚀 KaneAI - Test Execution Dashboard
🔍 Quick Access Links
⚡ Active HyperExecute Jobs
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | 4/10/2026, 12:03:59 PM |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🔍 KaneAI - Test Execution Failed ❌
📊 Test Execution Summary
| 📊 Metric | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🧪 Total Tests | 7 |
| ✅ Passed | 0 |
| ❌ Failed | 7 |
| 📊 Success Rate | 0% |
| 🎯 Status | Failed |
🔍 Failed Tests Overview
| 📝 Test Title | 🔍 Root Cause | |
|---|---|---|
| Search for Destination Properties | UI Data Defect | 🟡 medium |
| Validate Location Search Functionality | UI Data Defect | 🟡 medium |
| Search for Mumbai as a Travel Destination | UI Data Defect | 🟡 medium |
| Validate Location Search Functionality | UI Data Defect | 🟡 medium |
| Search for a Location on the Travel Website | UI Data Defect | 🔴 high |
📋 Detailed Test Analysis
1. Search for Destination Properties
| 📋 Property | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🎯 Status | ❌ Failed |
| ⭐ Priority | High |
| 🌍 Environment | Linux Config 1 |
| 🤖 Automation Status | Automated |
| 🆔 Test Case ID | 01KNVKYS3A2S8MJ026HHFGT7GK |
| 🔗 Test Results | View Details |
🔍 Root Cause Analysis:
- 📂 Category: UI Data Defect
- 📝 Summary: The test expected the 'Where' field to contain the full suggestion 'Mumbai, Maharashtra, India' but the page only shows 'Mumbai, Maharashtra'. This mismatch caused the assertion to fail and the test to stop.
⚠️ Severity: medium
📈 Error Timeline:
| 🔢 Step | 📅 Timestamp | 🎯 Status | 📝 Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 🔴 RC | The test read the 'Where' field and found the text 'Mumbai, Maharashtra'. The test expected 'Mumbai, Maharashtra, India'. |
| 2 | 4/10/2026, 12:01:56 AM | 🟡 W | The test tried the assertion multiple times and retried, but the assertion kept failing because the field value did not include 'India'. |
| 3 | 4/10/2026, 12:01:56 AM | 🟡 W | The test framework raised a final runtime error reporting the failed assertion and stopped the test. |
2. Validate Location Search Functionality
| 📋 Property | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🎯 Status | ❌ Failed |
| ⭐ Priority | High |
| 🌍 Environment | Linux Config 1 |
| 🤖 Automation Status | Automated |
| 🆔 Test Case ID | 01KNVKYS44GFGJ8XNMMP6906Q1 |
| 🔗 Test Results | View Details |
🔍 Root Cause Analysis:
- 📂 Category: UI Data Defect
- 📝 Summary: The test failed because an assertion expected the location input to be empty, but the field still contained text ('Mum'). This assertion repeatedly failed and stopped the test.
⚠️ Severity: medium
📈 Error Timeline:
| 🔢 Step | 📅 Timestamp | 🎯 Status | 📝 Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 🟢 I | User typed 'Mum' into the location search field and the page showed the entered text and a matching suggestion. |
| 2 | 4/10/2026, 12:01:20 AM | 🔴 RC | Test executed the clear action on the 'Where' input, but a later check reported the field was not empty. |
| 3 | 4/10/2026, 12:01:40 AM | 🟡 W | The test retried the assertion that the field was empty multiple times; each retry failed with the same assertion error. |
| 4 | 4/10/2026, 12:02:06 AM | 🟡 W | The test raised a runtime error indicating the ASSERTION action failed and could not be completed. |
3. Search for Mumbai as a Travel Destination
| 📋 Property | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🎯 Status | ❌ Failed |
| ⭐ Priority | High |
| 🌍 Environment | Linux Config 1 |
| 🤖 Automation Status | Automated |
| 🆔 Test Case ID | 01KNVHBRXMW41M6WDH7JNSHQNB |
| 🔗 Test Results | View Details |
🔍 Root Cause Analysis:
- 📂 Category: UI Data Defect
- 📝 Summary: A test assertion failed: the script expected the location input to contain 'Mumbai' with suggestions visible, but the verification returned false and the test aborted after retries.
⚠️ Severity: medium
📈 Error Timeline:
| 🔢 Step | 📅 Timestamp | 🎯 Status | 📝 Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 🟢 I | The test opened the sample page and confirmed the main heading 'Discover Your Perfect Getaway' is visible. |
| 2 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:10 AM | 🟢 I | The test clicked the 'Where' field, focused it, typed 'Mumbai', and a vision check reported the field contains 'Mumbai' and the suggestions dropdown is visible. |
| 3 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:20 AM | 🔴 RC | The test assertion that the 'Where' field contains 'Mumbai' and that suggestions are visible failed repeatedly and raised a runtime error, causing retries and eventual test failure. |
| 4 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:40 AM | 🟡 W | The test retried the assertion multiple times but each retry raised the same assertion error; the test harness then raised a final failure. |
4. Validate Location Search Functionality
| 📋 Property | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🎯 Status | ❌ Failed |
| ⭐ Priority | High |
| 🌍 Environment | Linux Config 1 |
| 🤖 Automation Status | Automated |
| 🆔 Test Case ID | 01KNVF0AXJVVBCHJ9CQENYBSK7 |
| 🔗 Test Results | View Details |
🔍 Root Cause Analysis:
- 📂 Category: UI Data Defect
- 📝 Summary: The test failed because the main page heading read '404' instead of the expected text 'Discover Your Perfect Getaway', causing the assertion to fail.
⚠️ Severity: medium
📈 Error Timeline:
| 🔢 Step | 📅 Timestamp | 🎯 Status | 📝 Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 🟢 I | Test opened the sample page URL for validation. |
| 2 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:05 AM | 🔴 RC | An AI vision query reported the top heading text as '404' instead of the expected site heading. |
| 3 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:10 AM | 🟡 W | The test asserted the heading contains 'Discover Your Perfect Getaway' and failed repeatedly; retries were attempted but the heading remained '404'. |
| 4 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:26 AM | 🟡 W | The test action raised a runtime error after retries and reported a failed ASSERTION on the homepage heading. |
5. Search for a Location on the Travel Website
| 📋 Property | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🎯 Status | ❌ Failed |
| ⭐ Priority | High |
| 🌍 Environment | Linux Config 1 |
| 🤖 Automation Status | Automated |
| 🆔 Test Case ID | 01KNVF0AWKCWNJKGEV1BWA1A25 |
| 🔗 Test Results | View Details |
🔍 Root Cause Analysis:
- 📂 Category: UI Data Defect
- 📝 Summary: The test failed because the site did not load the expected homepage (404 shown). The assertion that the homepage was present failed and stopped the test.
⚠️ Severity: high
📈 Error Timeline:
| 🔢 Step | 📅 Timestamp | 🎯 Status | 📝 Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 🔴 RC | Test opened the website but the page returned a 404 error instead of the expected homepage content. |
| 2 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:18 AM | 🟡 W | The auto-heal vision query confirmed the target text was not found and reported the screen shows a 404 error. |
| 3 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:20 AM | 🟡 W | The test assertion checking that the homepage loaded failed repeatedly and retries were attempted. |
| 4 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:43 AM | 🟡 W | The assertion failure bubbled up and stopped the test run with a failure message indicating the homepage did not load. |
🔗 Test Run Dashboard
✅ RCA Analysis: Root cause analysis has been completed (5/5 RCAs found).
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | 4/10/2026, 12:11:19 PM
Contributor
|
@KaneAI validate this PR |
🚀 KaneAI Workflow Progress TrackerAutomated test case generation and execution for PR #130 🔄 Current StatusPR APPROVAL: Changes requested - some tests failed 📋 Test Cases
🧪 Test Run Management
📊 Reports
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | Last updated: 4/10/2026, 1:29:27 PM |
🧪 KaneAI Test Automation Progress📊 Test Authoring Status✅ All tests authored! 🔍 Test Case Details
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | Last updated: 4/10/2026, 1:21:52 PM |
🚀 KaneAI Test IntelligenceProject: KaneAI Generated | Generated: 4/10/2026, 1:21:57 PM 💡 Smart Test DiscoveryKaneAI has intelligently analyzed your PR changes and found existing test cases in your repository that are related to the files you've modified. This helps you:
📋 Related Test Cases in Your Repository
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | Last updated: 4/10/2026, 1:21:57 PM |
🚀 KaneAI - Test Execution Dashboard
🔍 Quick Access Links
⚡ Active HyperExecute Jobs
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | 4/10/2026, 1:25:13 PM |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🔍 KaneAI - Test Execution Failed ❌
📊 Test Execution Summary
| 📊 Metric | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🧪 Total Tests | 9 |
| ✅ Passed | 1 |
| ❌ Failed | 8 |
| 📊 Success Rate | 11% |
| 🎯 Status | Failed |
🔍 Failed Tests Overview
| 📝 Test Title | 🔍 Root Cause | |
|---|---|---|
| Validate Location Search Functionality | Backend Contract Violation | 🟡 medium |
| Search for Properties in Mumbai | UI Data Defect | 🟡 medium |
| Validate Location Search Functionality | UI Data Defect | 🟡 medium |
| Validate Location Search Functionality | Platform Failure | 🟡 medium |
| Search for Destination Properties | UI Data Defect | 🟡 medium |
📋 Detailed Test Analysis
1. Validate Location Search Functionality
| 📋 Property | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🎯 Status | ❌ Failed |
| ⭐ Priority | High |
| 🌍 Environment | Linux Config 1 |
| 🤖 Automation Status | Automated |
| 🆔 Test Case ID | 01KNVRMAHFYNM41G7JHZJZ50B7 |
| 🔗 Test Results | View Details |
🔍 Root Cause Analysis:
- 📂 Category: Backend Contract Violation
- 📝 Summary: The selected location text in the 'Where' field did not match the expected full location name.
⚠️ Severity: medium
📈 Error Timeline:
| 🔢 Step | 📅 Timestamp | 🎯 Status | 📝 Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6/15/2024, 12:00:00 AM | 🟢 I | You clicked the Mumbai option from the list of locations. |
| 2 | 6/15/2024, 12:00:05 AM | 🔴 RC | The app displayed 'Mumbai, Maharashtra' in the Where field after selection. |
| 3 | 6/15/2024, 12:00:06 AM | 🟡 W | The check failed because the expected was 'Mumbai, Maharashtra, India' but actual was 'Mumbai, Maharashtra'. |
2. Search for Properties in Mumbai
| 📋 Property | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🎯 Status | ❌ Failed |
| ⭐ Priority | High |
| 🌍 Environment | Linux Config 1 |
| 🤖 Automation Status | Automated |
| 🆔 Test Case ID | 01KNVRMAK7TAAEB75PFNBVGHCS |
| 🔗 Test Results | View Details |
🔍 Root Cause Analysis:
- 📂 Category: UI Data Defect
- 📝 Summary: A test assertion failed because the text read from the Where location field was 'Mumbai, Maharashtra' but the test expected 'Mumbai, Maharashtra, India'. This mismatch caused the test to stop after repeated retries.
⚠️ Severity: medium
📈 Error Timeline:
| 🔢 Step | 📅 Timestamp | 🎯 Status | 📝 Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 🔴 RC | The test read the Where field and found 'Mumbai, Maharashtra' which did not match the test's expected 'Mumbai, Maharashtra, India'. |
| 2 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 🟡 W | The test clicked the Mumbai suggestion from the dropdown and the field updated to show a shorter location text. |
| 3 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 🟡 W | Vision checks confirmed the suggestion 'Mumbai, Maharashtra, India' was visible in the dropdown before it was clicked. |
| 4 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 🟡 W | The framework retried the assertion multiple times and each retry failed with the same mismatch, then raised the runtime error that aborted the test action. |
3. Validate Location Search Functionality
| 📋 Property | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🎯 Status | ❌ Failed |
| ⭐ Priority | Medium |
| 🌍 Environment | Linux Config 1 |
| 🤖 Automation Status | Automated |
| 🆔 Test Case ID | 01KNVRBPQRM2RNXJTZEQ1WSNGJ |
| 🔗 Test Results | View Details |
🔍 Root Cause Analysis:
- 📂 Category: UI Data Defect
- 📝 Summary: The test failed because an assertion that the 'Where' location input had keyboard focus did not pass. The automation checked for a visible text cursor/caret after clicking the input, the check returned false, and the test raised an assertion failure.
⚠️ Severity: medium
📈 Error Timeline:
| 🔢 Step | 📅 Timestamp | 🎯 Status | 📝 Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 🟢 I | Test opened the sample page and verified the heading 'Discover Your Perfect Getaway' is visible. |
| 2 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:10 AM | 🟢 I | The test clicked the location input labeled 'Where' and verified the click succeeded and focus state was checked. |
| 3 | 4/10/2026, 12:00:58 AM | 🔴 RC | A visual check looked for a visible text cursor in the input and reported the input was NOT focused. The test assertion 'where_focused equals true' failed repeatedly and finally caused the test to stop. |
| 4 | 4/10/2026, 12:01:20 AM | 🟡 W | The test retried the focus assertion several times; each retry produced the same assertion failure. |
4. Validate Location Search Functionality
| 📋 Property | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🎯 Status | ❌ Failed |
| ⭐ Priority | High |
| 🌍 Environment | Linux Config 1 |
| 🤖 Automation Status | Automated |
| 🆔 Test Case ID | 01KNVRBPQ8YDBT8G2GR7DY94KY |
| 🔗 Test Results | View Details |
🔍 Root Cause Analysis:
- 📂 Category: Platform Failure
- 📝 Summary: A request to the platform's heal/vision service timed out while waiting for a response. The test could not complete the vision check and aborted that verification step.
⚠️ Severity: medium
📈 Error Timeline:
| 🔢 Step | 📅 Timestamp | 🎯 Status | 📝 Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11/27/2025, 6:31:11 AM | 🟢 I | The homepage loaded and the main heading 'Discover Your Perfect Getaway' was found and verified. |
| 2 | 11/27/2025, 6:31:25 AM | 🟢 I | The test located the 'Where' location search input and clicked it successfully, but the subsequent focus check returned false. |
| 3 | 11/27/2025, 6:33:10 AM | 🔴 RC | The test called the platform heal/vision service to verify the focused state, but the platform call timed out while waiting for a response. |
| 4 | 11/27/2025, 6:33:10 AM | 🟡 W | The test ended after the timeout and reported the read timeout error from the platform HTTP client. |
5. Search for Destination Properties
| 📋 Property | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🎯 Status | ❌ Failed |
| ⭐ Priority | High |
| 🌍 Environment | Linux Config 1 |
| 🤖 Automation Status | Automated |
| 🆔 Test Case ID | 01KNVKYS3A2S8MJ026HHFGT7GK |
| 🔗 Test Results | View Details |
🔍 Root Cause Analysis:
- 📂 Category: UI Data Defect
- 📝 Summary: A test assertion expected the Where field to contain 'Mumbai, Maharashtra, India' but the actual field text was 'Mumbai, Maharashtra'. The assertion repeated and the test stopped when the check failed.
⚠️ Severity: medium
📈 Error Timeline:
| 🔢 Step | 📅 Timestamp | 🎯 Status | 📝 Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4/10/2025, 12:00:00 AM | 🟢 I | The test checked that the main page heading 'Discover Your Perfect Getaway' is visible and it was found. |
| 2 | 4/10/2025, 12:00:10 AM | 🟢 I | The test typed 'Mumbai' into the Where field and clicked the 'Mumbai, Maharashtra, India' suggestion. The field then showed 'Mumbai, Maharashtra'. |
| 3 | 4/10/2025, 12:00:15 AM | 🔴 RC | The test read the Where field and got 'Mumbai, Maharashtra' which did not match the test's expected string containing 'Mumbai, Maharashtra, India'. |
| 4 | 4/10/2025, 12:01:00 AM | 🟡 W | The assertion that the Where field contains 'Mumbai, Maharashtra, India' failed and was retried multiple times before giving up. |
🔗 Test Run Dashboard
✅ RCA Analysis: Root cause analysis has been completed (5/5 RCAs found).
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | 4/10/2026, 1:32:02 PM
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.