Skip to content

merge queue: embarking main (8980236), #336, #337 and #344 together#353

Closed
mergify[bot] wants to merge 6 commits intomainfrom
mergify/merge-queue/3e5c5b2e90
Closed

merge queue: embarking main (8980236), #336, #337 and #344 together#353
mergify[bot] wants to merge 6 commits intomainfrom
mergify/merge-queue/3e5c5b2e90

Conversation

@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mergify mergify Bot commented Apr 9, 2026

✨ Pull request #336 which was ahead in the queue has been dequeued (for the following reason: pull request manually updated). The pull request #344 has been re-embarked. ✨

Branch main (8980236), #336, #337 and #344 are embarked together for merge.

This pull request has been created by Mergify to speculatively check the mergeability of #344.
You don't need to do anything. Mergify will close this pull request automatically when it is complete.

Required conditions of queue rule Python Dependency Updates for merge:

  • check-success = Test Image / API Test
  • any of [🛡 GitHub repository ruleset rule main]:
    • check-neutral = Mergify Merge Protections
    • check-skipped = Mergify Merge Protections
    • check-success = Mergify Merge Protections

Required conditions to stay in the queue:

  • author = renovate[bot]
  • check-success = Check Dependency Compatibility
  • files ~= ^(uv.lock|pyproject.toml)$
  • any of [🛡 GitHub repository ruleset rule main]:
    • check-neutral = Mergify Merge Protections
    • check-skipped = Mergify Merge Protections
    • check-success = Mergify Merge Protections
---
checking_base_sha: 5195aaffef44255a91cfedde7966d45917896e23
previous_failed_batches: []
pull_requests:
  - number: 344
    scopes: []
scopes: []
...

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sourcery-ai Bot commented Apr 9, 2026

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Updates Python version constraint and a development dependency version in pyproject.toml, with corresponding lockfile changes for dependency resolution.

Flow diagram for dependency update and lockfile regeneration

graph TD
  Renovate["Renovate bot proposes version bumps"] --> UpdatePyproject["Update pyproject.toml constraints"]

  UpdatePyproject --> RegenerateLock["Regenerate uv.lock with new constraints"]
  RegenerateLock --> CommitChanges["Commit pyproject.toml and uv.lock"]

  CommitChanges --> CI["CI: Check Dependency Compatibility"]
  CI --> MergifyQueue["Mergify merge queue (Python_Dependency_Updates)"]
  MergifyQueue --> MergeMain["Merge into main if all checks pass"]
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Relaxed Python runtime version requirement and bumped a dev dependency, updating the lockfile accordingly.
  • Changed the supported Python version range in the project configuration to require a newer 3.14 patch release while keeping the upper bound at <3.15.
  • Updated the ty development dependency to the next patch version in the dev dependency group.
  • Regenerated or updated uv.lock to reflect the new Python requirement and dev dependency version so dependency resolution stays consistent.
pyproject.toml
uv.lock

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Apr 9, 2026

@mergify mergify Bot closed this Apr 9, 2026
@mergify mergify Bot deleted the mergify/merge-queue/3e5c5b2e90 branch April 9, 2026 21:05
@deepsource-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

deepsource-io Bot commented Apr 9, 2026

DeepSource Code Review

We reviewed changes in 8980236...3893db8 on this pull request. Below is the summary for the review, and you can see the individual issues we found as inline review comments.

See full review on DeepSource ↗

PR Report Card

Overall Grade   Security  

Reliability  

Complexity  

Hygiene  

Code Review Summary

Analyzer Status Updated (UTC) Details
Python Apr 9, 2026 9:04p.m. Review ↗
Secrets Apr 9, 2026 9:04p.m. Review ↗

Important

AI Review is run only on demand for your team. We're only showing results of static analysis review right now. To trigger AI Review, comment @deepsourcebot review on this thread.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants