-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Improvements for helicity, q(r) discritization, and d_phi advance #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This pull request implements improvements to the magnetic geometry calculations to better match empirical C-Mod data, specifically addressing helicity handling, q(r) discretization, and the d_phi advance calculation.
Changes:
- Switched from interpolation to smoothing splines for q(psi) and F(psi) to avoid discretization jumps
- Added helicity_sign parameter to control the sign of the helicity in filament tracing
- Improved d_phi calculation to use actual segment lengths instead of assuming circular cross-sections
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 19 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| synthwave/magnetic_geometry/equilibrium_field.py | Replaced interpolating splines with smoothing splines for q(psi) and F(psi); added lam parameter for smoothing control; changed ValueError to SyntaxError in error handling |
| synthwave/magnetic_geometry/filaments.py | Added helicity_sign parameter to _trace method; updated _Z_a and psi_prime_a functions to use helicity_sign; implemented new _d_phi_dl function using actual segment lengths; increased Newton solver iterations |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
|
@chandrarn I've opened a new pull request, #2, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you. |
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: chandrarn <8441592+chandrarn@users.noreply.github.com>
[WIP] Update helicity and q(r) discretization based on feedback
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 11 comments.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
|
@copilot open a new pull request to apply changes based on the comments in this thread |
|
@chandrarn I've opened a new pull request, #3, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you. |
|
@copilot open a new pull request to apply changes based on the comments in this thread |
|
@chandrarn I've opened a new pull request, #4, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you. |
[WIP] Improve helicity and q(r) discretization for d_phi advance
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@copilot open a new pull request to apply changes based on the comments in this thread |
|
@chandrarn I've opened a new pull request, #5, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you. |
ZanderKeith
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix linting and I'll approve.
chandrarn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
pre-commit lint checks
Improvements to ensure agreement with empirical C-Mod data. The improved d_phi step is necessary for accurate filament structures for non-interger m/n modes. The fix corrects an assumption that d_l_theta = r theta, which is only true in the limiting case of circular cross section.