refactor return to

[JoeyRubas]

The return to feature has been a great convenience enhancement, but the ugly URLs are uneeded. We keep the same functionality but more the metadata outside the URLS

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 98.18182% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 75.33%. Comparing base (b52553d) to head (65e2efe).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
mittab/apps/tab/middleware.py	92.85%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #500      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.17%   75.33%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files         108      109       +1     
  Lines        7711     7760      +49     
==========================================
+ Hits         5797     5846      +49     
  Misses       1914     1914              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.