docs: Recipe → MCP Bridge features page

[praisonai-triage-agent]

Fixes #2111

[MervinPraison]

@coderabbitai review

[MervinPraison]

/review

[MervinPraison]

@gemini review this PR

[qodo-code-review]

Qodo reviews are paused for this user.

Troubleshooting steps vary by plan Learn more →

On a Teams plan?
Reviews resume once this user has a paid seat and their Git account is linked in Qodo.
Link Git account →

Using GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab Self-Managed, or Bitbucket Data Center?
These require an Enterprise plan - Contact us
Contact us →

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new documentation page (docs/features/mcp-recipe-server.mdx) detailing the "Recipe -> MCP Bridge" feature, which allows users to serve a PraisonAI recipe as a scoped MCP server. It also updates existing documentation to link to this new guide. Feedback on the documentation suggests guarding the top-level execution code in the Python recipe example with if __name__ == "__main__": to prevent premature execution when the recipe is loaded or imported by the MCP server adapter.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

[gemini-code-assist]

When a Python recipe is loaded or imported by the MCP server adapter, any top-level execution code like agent.start(...) will run immediately during the server's startup/loading phase. To prevent the agent from executing prematurely, it is best practice to guard the execution block with if __name__ == "__main__":.

from praisonaiagents import Agent

agent = Agent(
    name="support-reply",
    instructions="Draft a friendly reply to a customer support ticket.",
)

if __name__ == "__main__":
    agent.start("Customer says their order is late.")

[MervinPraison]

Merge gate scan — eligible for assessment. Claude merge gate will assess and may auto-merge if MERGE_GATE_VERDICT: APPROVE.

[praisonai-triage-agent]

MERGE_GATE_VERDICT: APPROVE

All checklist items passed:

• Scope: 4 files, 390 additions / 1 deletion — within docs-primary limits (1200 lines / 40 files).
• File placement: New page at docs/features/mcp-recipe-server.mdx — correct per AGENTS.md §1.9. No docs/concepts/ changes.
• docs.json: Nav-only addition (one new entry inserted into existing list) — allowed.
• Sensitive paths: No changes to .github/workflows/, mint.json, or non-nav docs.json sections. No secrets in diff.
• Labels: claude-merge-gate-active, pipeline/merge-ready — no blocking labels present.
• CI on HEAD b77261c0: pipeline-sync ✅, scan-conflicts ✅, no failures.
• Reviews: No CHANGES_REQUESTED. Gemini left a COMMENTED review (minor suggestion about if __name__ == "__main__": guard in the Python example — not a blocking state). Qodo paused; CodeRabbit/Copilot: no review.
• AGENTS.md compliance: Complete frontmatter, hero Mermaid diagram with correct color scheme, Quick Start with <Steps>, <AccordionGroup>, <CardGroup>, <Warning> and <Note> callouts — all present.

[MervinPraison]

Merged by Claude PR merge gate (claude-merge-gate.yml).
Verdict: MERGE_GATE_VERDICT: APPROVE
SHA: b77261c
Method: merge

[MervinPraison]

Merge gate scan — not eligible for auto-merge.

• not open
• already merged by gate
• mergeState=UNKNOWN

Actions: wait for CI and the Claude review chain, or add label needs-manual-review and merge manually.
Opt out: label no-auto-merge.

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Review finished.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@MervinPraison, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 28 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 5c5764de-238f-43f6-9b79-61e250cb1505

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e1d67b0 and b77261c.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• docs.json
• docs/features/mcp-recipe-server.mdx
• docs/features/praisonai-mcp-package.mdx
• docs/mcp/praisonai-mcp-server.mdx

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch claude/issue-2111-20260717-1024

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}