Skip to content

Updates for NorESM3.0#16

Open
mvdebolskiy wants to merge 49 commits intonoresmfrom
update-wrap-ocn
Open

Updates for NorESM3.0#16
mvdebolskiy wants to merge 49 commits intonoresmfrom
update-wrap-ocn

Conversation

@mvdebolskiy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mvdebolskiy mvdebolskiy commented Apr 23, 2026

@mvertens @mpetrini-norce I've fixed submodules and made the merge. The only thing is that for source_cism you have to checkout the PR branch.

Katetc and others added 30 commits July 25, 2025 13:52
@Katetc
Updates to namelists from Bill
ac1bd41
@Katetc
Fix bugs to get GRIS test working
ed0f3c5
@Katetc
Update to XML to add restart date to the rpointer file
4864068
@Katetc
Updated ChangeLog for cismwrap_2_2_008
9dfdc48
@Katetc
Merge pull request ESCOMP#119 from ESCOMP/katetc/rpointer_date
be2e410 
Minor update to config_archive.xml
@Katetc
Namelist updates to get AIS tests to pass
7823447
@Katetc
Merge branch 'ESCOMP:master' into katetc/calvingmip-pr
931321a
@Katetc
Fix to address issue ESCOMP#107
070d6ec
@Katetc
Update changelog for cismwrap_2_2_009
f8a6d46
@Katetc
Merge pull request ESCOMP#120 from Katetc/katetc/calvingmip-pr
429658e 
Updates to the namelist to support the new options in the cism_main_2.02.002 external. Also changes defaults for all configurations. Addresses Issue ESCOMP#107
@Katetc
Update to Alpha07d externals to recreate archiving bug
d964d70
@Katetc
Second half of PR116
16b0d73
@Katetc
Changes to testlist to run with updated CIME
721849b
@Katetc
Last test update, ChangeLog notes
26e94a9
@Katetc
Merge pull request ESCOMP#121 from Katetc/another-rpointer-pr
8476778 
Externals updates and Another rpointer pr
@gunterl
Update GrIS 4km grid and input file information
91f7023 
GrIS grid information update to match the ISMIP6 grid.
@gunterl
Increasing grid tolerance
057d520 
With the new GrIS grid, the tolerance between the ESMF mesh file and the
lat-lon value in the CISM input file had a difference of about 1.15e-05
which is higher than the default tolerance of 1e-05, leading to an error
and the abort of the simulation. The tolerance was raised to 2e-05 to
circumvent the problem.
@Katetc
Merge pull request ESCOMP#124 from gunterl/cism_wrapper_gris_ismip6
67ba8f0 
New gris4 grid files for CESM3. No tag for this PR, will tag on the next.
@Katetc
Adding DGLC path and new ccs_config tag
ec38f51
@Katetc
Add JK1850D DGLC and CTSM compset for testing and a test
1406de3
@Katetc
Updated ChangeLog
a35c1e7
@Katetc
Merge pull request ESCOMP#128 from Katetc/cism-wrapper-2-2-011
d18e0a3 
Cism wrapper 2 2 011
@Katetc
Point to new branch for testing
3dfb6fa
@Katetc
Updates from Bill in issue ESCOMP#126
9260bb2
@Katetc
Updates needed to run gris4 test
334abb9
@Katetc
Update PE layouts to be smaller for Derecho
6ce728a
@Katetc
Changed stdout to iulog in CISM, set equal in cism_wrapper init
dedd44a
@Katetc
Changed comments in which_ho_coulomb_c and added btemp_scale parameter
0cff0d9
@Katetc
Updated test user_nl to use flow_factor_float instead of flow_factor
ce7fb05
@Katetc
Point to new CISM tag and update submodule
dba0119
@mvdebolskiy mvdebolskiy mentioned this pull request Apr 23, 2026
Merged
@mvertens
Copy link
Copy Markdown

mvertens commented Apr 28, 2026

@mvdebolskiy - thanks so much for this.
@mvdebolskiy @mpetrini-norce - can I suggest that @mpetrini-norce fix the restart problems in CISM (see #12) and then once that is fixed and the PR committed we then udpate the .gitmodules here to that tag and merge this PR. Does that sound reasonable?

@mvertens mvertens mentioned this pull request Apr 29, 2026
Open
@mvdebolskiy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

mvdebolskiy commented May 4, 2026 •
edited
Loading

@mpetrini-norce I see that you have been using old antarctica grids from ESCOMP. Is this correct? Are we not planning to use 761x761 grid that we have added last May?

Also, did you do any antarctica runs at all with your branch?

@mvdebolskiy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

mvdebolskiy commented May 4, 2026 

    FAIL ERI_Ly11.ne30pg3_tn14_gris4.TC1850Gg.betzy_gnu.cism-cplhist_nor_ocn2glc RUN time=76
    FAIL ERS_D_Ly11.ne30pg3_tn14_ais8gris4.TC1850Gag.betzy_gnu.cism-cplhist_nor_ocn2glc SHAREDLIB_BUILD time=9
    FAIL ERS_D_Ly11.ne30pg3_tn14_ais8gris4.TC1850Gag.betzy_intel.cism-cplhist_nor_ocn2glc SHAREDLIB_BUILD time=9

@mvdebolskiy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

mvdebolskiy commented May 4, 2026

I assume this all is due to the fact that the original PR branch was based on ESCOMP/main from before we added ocn2glc coupling at NorESMhub and those things were reintroduced.

@mvertens
Copy link
Copy Markdown

mvertens commented May 5, 2026

I've fixed some problems - but this wrapper code continues to have problems with the aux_cism tests - particularly for Antarctica.
As an example - the following type of error occurs:

ERS_D_Ly11.ne30pg3_tn14_ais8gris4.TC1850Gag.betzy_gnu.cism-cplhist_nor_ocn2glc
* FATAL ERROR :  Dimension x1 of file /cluster/shared/noresm/inputdata/glc/cism/Antarctica/antarctica_8km_epsg3031_c20250403.nc does not match with config dimension:          761         704

The setting of the icesheet for ais has not change:
glc/cism/Antarctica/antarctica_8km_epsg3031_c20250403.nc

I changed back the following changes in namelist_definition.xml

<entry id="ewn" >
-      <value icesheet="ais"  glc_grid="ais8"   >704</value>
+      <value icesheet="ais"  glc_grid="ais8"   >761</value>
  <entry id="nsn" >
-      <value icesheet="ais"  glc_grid="ais8"   >576</value>
+      <value icesheet="ais"  glc_grid="ais8"   >761</value>
 <entry id="upn" >
-      <value icesheet="ais"  glc_grid="ais8"   >11</value>
+      <value icesheet="ais"  glc_grid="ais8"   >5</value>

The dimension mismatch has gone - but now I am getting the error:

387: At line 630 of file /cluster/projects/nn9560k/mvertens/src/noresm3_0_beta16_pr/components/cism/source_cism/libglissade/glissade_utils.F90
387: Fortran runtime error: Index '3' of dimension 2 of array 'field_2d' above upper bound of 1

@mvertens mvertens force-pushed the update-wrap-ocn branch from 726de02 to bf2711f Compare May 7, 2026 17:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@mvdebolskiy @mvertens @Katetc @gunterl @mpetrini-norce