t.list: Add tests files to t.list#7482
Open
saket0187 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
github-actions
Bot
added
temporal
echoix
reviewed
Jun 2, 2026
| from grass.tools import Tools | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| @pytest.mark.needs_solo_run |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Have you tried without that marker first? This forces the test to be run without any other test running in a separate worker, which is slower. We should aim to be able to run most new tests without this. Some use cases where it is useful and needed, is when a test calls some code that already starts multiple processes or threads, such as when running with pytest-xdist, the jobs to do become slower because we are starting too much jobs vs the CPUs available.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds pytest-based test files for
t.listas part of the discussion in #7466 .