Levels review C03#843
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
@ottosulin you need to rebase because of the conflict, other than that, I would approve the PR! |
49cb3b9 to
606ce1d
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
C03 Levels Review
Polishing pass on C03 (Model Lifecycle Management & Change Control) focused on level assignments and implementability.
Changes
C3.1.2: L1 -> L2
edit: removed; @RicoKomenda had already opened PR with same change.
C3.1.3: L1 -> L2
Rationale: Signature verification requires the same infrastructure as signing (C3.1.2). Deployment admission controllers must be integrated with verification logic, and model loading must include signature checks. Not trivial (L1). Consistent with C3.1.2 moving to L2.
C3.6.2: L3 -> L2
Rationale: Separation of duties for critical operations is a foundational control in ISO 27001 A.5.3 and a baseline expectation in SOC 2 CC8.1, not an advanced practice.
All major MLOps platforms support approval workflows natively: SageMaker Model Registry (PendingManualApproval), MLflow alias promotion gates with CI/CD approval. Fine-tuning SoD is no harder than code deployment SoD, which ASVS places at L2. The previous gap between C1.1.3 (basic approval, L1) and C3.6.2 (L3) was unjustified - ISO 27001 and SOC 2 do not grade SoD as three levels above basic approval.