fix(C01,C02,C03,C10,AppC): improve testability and remove ambiguous l…#848
Conversation
|
Same as the other PRs in this batch: the diff has 5 of the 10 changes listed (the Appendix C edits, C01 1.2.1, and C02 2.1.6 aren't here). Were those meant to be pushed? The present ones are mostly good. C01 1.4.6, C03 3.2.5, and C10 10.3.3 are clear improvements. Two notes:
|
…uage Preface rule: conformance must be objectively validatable via test/inspection/audit. - AppC AC.3.6: drop 'tokenized' (NLP tokenization is not data-security tokenization; the term was incorrect here). - AppC AC.4.3: define 'critical security finding' as CVSS >= 9.0 or the org severity policy, so the merge gate is auditable. - AppC AC.6.2: scope fine-tuning to orgs that control training infra. - C01 1.2.1: replace 'assessed and addressed' with a minimum documented deliverable (impact assessment + selected mitigation). - C01 1.4.5 (review): keep the concrete adversarial examples (they make the intent clear), add testable timing (prior to deployment and after any significant model update), and drop the unanchored audit-log phrase. - C01 1.4.6: require the chosen defense and tuning rationale to be recorded alongside the model artifact. - C02 2.1.6: replace 'regional legal constraints' with an auditable attribute (regional content-policy classification). - C02 2.3.1 (review): drop 'illegal requests' (jurisdiction-dependent) and do NOT append a vague policy clause — policy-violating inputs are already covered by 2.3.3. - C03 3.2.5: add a minimum testable bar (prompt-injection rejection and tool output sanitization). - C10 10.3.3: clarify Origin and Host are validated independently and either failing is sufficient to reject.
21d185e to
eb4e65b
Compare
Same partial-diff fix: AppC edits, C01 1.2.1, and C02 2.1.6 are now included. |
|
All ten changes are in now, and both earlier points are addressed: 1.4.5 keeps the threat examples and drops the audit-log reference, and 2.3.1 drops the overlapping sentence. The new ones are solid too. AC.3.6 fixing the "tokenized" misnomer, AC.4.3's CVSS >= 9.0 threshold, and C02 2.1.6 moving off "regional legal constraints" are all good calls. No remaining concerns from me. |
…anguage
Preface rule: 'conformance can be objectively validated through testing, inspection, or audit.'