chore: update packages#2
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds new tests across multiple modules, introduces several new object and promise utilities (objectPick/objectOmit/clearUndefined/hasOwnProperty/isKeyOf/objectKeys/objectEntries and createPromiseLock/createControlledPromise plus a reset-capable createSingletonPromise), and bumps package metadata and devDependency versions. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Caller
participant PromiseLock
participant Task
Caller->>PromiseLock: run(task)
PromiseLock->>Task: start task
Task-->>PromiseLock: resolve/result
PromiseLock-->>Caller: returns task result
Caller->>PromiseLock: wait() -- waits while isWaiting true
PromiseLock->>Caller: wait resolved when no running tasks
Caller->>PromiseLock: clear() -- clears pending state
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)
50-50: Consider aligning@types/nodeversion with actual Node.js version in use.The project specifies
"engines": { "node": ">=20" }but uses@types/node@^25.3.5. The@types/nodemajor version should match your environment's Node.js major version.If developers are running Node.js 20, 22, or 24 (rather than 25), they may encounter type definitions for APIs not available in their runtime. This typically doesn't cause runtime issues but could lead to confusion during development.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@package.json` at line 50, The `@types/node` devDependency semantic major (currently "@types/node": "^25.3.5") does not match the project's declared Node engine ("engines": { "node": ">=20" }); either align the types to your runtime by changing the "@types/node" entry in package.json to the matching major (for example set it to a 20.x range like "^20.0.0" if the team runs Node 20) or update the engines field to require Node 25+ if you intentionally need `@types/node`@25; after updating package.json run your package manager to refresh lockfile (npm/yarn/pnpm) so the installed types match the declared version.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@package.json`:
- Line 54: The upgraded "eslint": "^10.0.3" in package.json conflicts with the
peerDependency of `@setemiojo/eslint-config` (which requires eslint@^9.10.0);
revert the eslint entry in package.json back to a 9.x range (e.g., "eslint":
"^9.10.0") so peer deps are satisfied, update the lockfile (npm install or yarn
install) to reflect the change, and run lint/tests; alternatively, if you prefer
to wait for an upstream fix, leave package.json unchanged and add a brief PR
note explaining that eslint must stay at ^9.x until `@setemiojo/eslint-config`
releases ESLint 10 support.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@package.json`:
- Line 50: The `@types/node` devDependency semantic major (currently
"@types/node": "^25.3.5") does not match the project's declared Node engine
("engines": { "node": ">=20" }); either align the types to your runtime by
changing the "@types/node" entry in package.json to the matching major (for
example set it to a 20.x range like "^20.0.0" if the team runs Node 20) or
update the engines field to require Node 25+ if you intentionally need
`@types/node`@25; after updating package.json run your package manager to refresh
lockfile (npm/yarn/pnpm) so the installed types match the declared version.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 9201350f-5528-47bb-9d02-4dab1b340a18
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
package.json
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 85.13% 98.71% +13.58%
===========================================
Files 14 13 -1
Lines 888 623 -265
Branches 269 117 -152
===========================================
- Hits 756 615 -141
+ Misses 132 8 -124
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
2 participants
Update npm global packages and project dependencies using pnpm upgrade and taze.
Co-Authored-By: Oz oz-agent@warp.dev
Summary by CodeRabbit