Conversation
6c100c8 to
5a5c266
Compare
|
Since I started using HRMs this week, I'm not so fond of the What about replacing it with |
1e88016 to
d83b32c
Compare
|
In fact, with HRM, nearly all I like I think a good improvement to make the layer more suitable with HRM would be to have :
|
Definitely agree with you, I didn’t want to change the existing mappings and introduce a breaking change. If the maintainers of Arsenik express a wish to improve the full layer, maybe we could rethink some existing placements.
Do you mean it doesn’t work on your machine or simply that you already have a better way to Alt-Tab?
Totally! But just like redo this would mean messing with existing mappings. I’m starting to think a new HRM-optimized navigation layer ( Edit: see draft #52 |
d83b32c to
c1d58a7
Compare
I do not use Alt-Tab as I use a tiling windows manager. |
c1d58a7 to
268f8f7
Compare
8ff9aa5 to
5b7eab6
Compare
- A-rght/lft in the case of macOS
- M-tab in the case of macOS
- M-y in the case of macOS
5b7eab6 to
412fab4
Compare
Here’s my humble attempt at filling the gaps in the vim navigation layer 🙂
Next/previous word – nwd/pwd
C-rght→[T]C-lft→[B]Word-by-word navigation in every text area! This one is definitely biased towards Ergo‑L as it maps perfectly with its
wandb, so the position is the same as in vim.Alt-tab – swp
A-tab→[G]Quickly swap between two applications! The mapping is located right next to
S-tabandtab.Find – fndC-f→[G]Still quite biased towards Ergo‑L, but in this case we’re not so far from Qwerty’sf.Redo – rdo
C-y→[/]Position symmetrical to Arsenik’s existing ndo.