Reject unsupported LLM providers#1
Draft
schultzjack wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Linked Issue
Closes OpenConceptLab/ocl_issues#2582
Summary
Adds a small provider normalization path for the MCP client chat route so unsupported LLM providers are rejected with a clear 400 error instead of falling through to Anthropic.
Also removes the currently unsupported Mistral, Gemini, and Ollama choices from the chat UI and aligns
.env.example/ README provider language with the providers that are wired in the app today.Test Plan
python3 -m unittest tests.test_provider_configpython3 -m py_compile mcp-client/routes/providers.py mcp-client/routes/frontend.pyNotes
This intentionally does not add new provider implementations. It keeps the first fix limited to making the current UI/backend contract accurate; future PRs can add Mistral, Gemini, or Ollama with the required dependencies and model defaults.