Add support for owner relationships & a few other requests

[andrewstillv15]

Resolves ##14198

Problem

We need to support owner relationships

Solution

Given this Terraform config file

I had claude write some test cases for me

# ============================================================================
# Tests with owner_relationship and management rules
# ============================================================================

# Test 1: Basic owner relationship with built-in property (alias)
resource "opslevel_component_type" "backend_with_owner" {
  name        = "Backend Service"
  alias       = "backend-service"
  description = "Backend services with automatic team ownership"
  properties  = {}
  
  icon = {
    color = "#3B82F6"
    name  = "PhDatabase"
  }
  
  owner_relationship = {
    management_rules = [
      {
        operator        = "EQUALS"
        source_property = "alias"
        target_property = "alias"
        target_type     = "team"
      }
    ]
  }
}

# Test 2: Owner relationship with tag matching
resource "opslevel_component_type" "frontend_with_tags" {
  name        = "Frontend Service"
  alias       = "frontend-service"
  description = "Frontend services with tag-based team ownership"
  properties  = {}
  
  icon = {
    color = "#EC4899"
    name  = "PhDesktop"
  }
  
  owner_relationship = {
    management_rules = [
      {
        operator              = "EQUALS"
        source_property       = "tag"
        source_tag_key        = "team"
        source_tag_operation  = "equals"
        target_property       = "name"
        target_type           = "team"
      }
    ]
  }
}

# Test 3: Owner relationship with starts_with tag operation
resource "opslevel_component_type" "mobile_with_prefix" {
  name        = "Mobile App"
  alias       = "mobile-app"
  description = "Mobile apps with prefix-based team ownership"
  properties  = {}
  
  icon = {
    color = "#14B8A6"
    name  = "PhDeviceMobile"
  }
  
  owner_relationship = {
    management_rules = [
      {
        operator              = "EQUALS"
        source_property       = "tag"
        source_tag_key        = "owner"
        source_tag_operation  = "starts_with"
        target_property       = "alias"
        target_type           = "team"
      }
    ]
  }
}

# Test 4: Multiple management rules (OR logic)
resource "opslevel_component_type" "api_multiple_rules" {
  name        = "API Service"
  alias       = "api-service"
  description = "API services with multiple ownership matching rules"
  properties  = {}
  
  icon = {
    color = "#8B5CF6"
    name  = "PhPlug"
  }
  
  owner_relationship = {
    management_rules = [
      # Rule 1: Match by alias
      {
        operator        = "EQUALS"
        source_property = "alias"
        target_property = "alias"
        target_type     = "team"
      },
      # Rule 2: Match by owner tag
      {
        operator              = "EQUALS"
        source_property       = "tag"
        source_tag_key        = "owner"
        source_tag_operation  = "equals"
        target_property       = "alias"
        target_type           = "team"
      },
      # Rule 3: Match by department tag to team tag
      {
        operator              = "EQUALS"
        source_property       = "tag"
        source_tag_key        = "department"
        source_tag_operation  = "starts_with"
        target_property       = "tag"
        target_tag_key        = "department"
        target_tag_operation  = "equals"
        target_type           = "team"
      }
    ]
  }
}

# Test 5: Owner relationship with name matching
resource "opslevel_component_type" "library_name" {
  name        = "Library"
  alias       = "library"
  description = "Libraries with name-based team ownership"
  properties  = {}
  
  icon = {
    color = "#F59E0B"
    name  = "PhBooks"
  }
  
  owner_relationship = {
    management_rules = [
      {
        operator        = "EQUALS"
        source_property = "name"
        target_property = "name"
        target_type     = "team"
      }
    ]
  }
}

# Test 6: Tag to tag matching (both source and target are tags)
resource "opslevel_component_type" "microservice_tag_to_tag" {
  name        = "Microservice"
  alias       = "microservice"
  description = "Microservices with tag-to-tag ownership matching"
  properties  = {}
  
  icon = {
    color = "#10B981"
    name  = "PhCube"
  }
  
  owner_relationship = {
    management_rules = [
      {
        operator              = "EQUALS"
        source_property       = "tag"
        source_tag_key        = "responsible-team"
        source_tag_operation  = "equals"
        target_property       = "tag"
        target_tag_key        = "team-identifier"
        target_tag_operation  = "starts_with"
        target_type           = "team"
      }
    ]
  }
}

# ============================================================================
# Tests for edge cases (nil, null, empty)
# ============================================================================

# Test 7: owner_relationship block completely absent (nil)
resource "opslevel_component_type" "no_owner_block" {
  name        = "No Owner Block"
  alias       = "no-owner-block"
  description = "Component type with no owner_relationship block at all"
  properties  = {}
  
  icon = {
    color = "#6366F1"
    name  = "PhClock"
  }
  
  # No owner_relationship block
}

# Test 8: owner_relationship block present but management_rules not specified
resource "opslevel_component_type" "owner_no_rules" {
  name        = "Owner No Rules"
  alias       = "owner-no-rules"
  description = "Component type with owner_relationship block but no management_rules"
  properties  = {}
  
  icon = {
    color = "#EF4444"
    name  = "PhWarning"
  }
  
  owner_relationship = {
    # No management_rules specified (null)
  }
}

# Test 9: owner_relationship block with empty management_rules list
resource "opslevel_component_type" "owner_empty_rules" {
  name        = "Owner Empty Rules"
  alias       = "owner-empty-rules"
  description = "Component type with owner_relationship block and empty management_rules"
  properties  = {}
  
  icon = {
    color = "#8B5CF6"
    name  = "PhList"
  }
  
  owner_relationship = {
    management_rules = []
  }
}

# Test 10: No owner relationship (alias for clarity)
resource "opslevel_component_type" "no_owner" {
  name        = "Configuration"
  alias       = "configuration"
  description = "Configuration components without automatic ownership"
  properties  = {}
  
  icon = {
    color = "#6B7280"
    name  = "PhGear"
  }
  
  # No owner_relationship block
}

# ============================================================================
# Outputs
# ============================================================================

output "component_type_ids" {
  value = {
    backend_with_owner      = opslevel_component_type.backend_with_owner.id
    frontend_with_tags      = opslevel_component_type.frontend_with_tags.id
    mobile_with_prefix      = opslevel_component_type.mobile_with_prefix.id
    api_multiple_rules      = opslevel_component_type.api_multiple_rules.id
    library_name            = opslevel_component_type.library_name.id
    microservice_tag_to_tag = opslevel_component_type.microservice_tag_to_tag.id
    no_owner_block          = opslevel_component_type.no_owner_block.id
    owner_no_rules          = opslevel_component_type.owner_no_rules.id
    owner_empty_rules       = opslevel_component_type.owner_empty_rules.id
    no_owner                = opslevel_component_type.no_owner.id
  }
}

output "test_summary" {
  value = {
    total_tests              = 10
    with_management_rules    = 6
    without_management_rules = 4
    edge_cases = {
      no_block    = "no_owner_block"
      null_rules  = "owner_no_rules"
      empty_rules = "owner_empty_rules"
    }
  }
}

The terraform apply output

component_type_ids = {
  "api_multiple_rules" = "Z2lkOi8vb3BzbGV2ZWwvQ29tcG9uZW50VHlwZXM6OlNlcnZpY2UvNTE5NA"
  "backend_with_owner" = "Z2lkOi8vb3BzbGV2ZWwvQ29tcG9uZW50VHlwZXM6OlNlcnZpY2UvNTE5Mw"
  "frontend_with_tags" = "Z2lkOi8vb3BzbGV2ZWwvQ29tcG9uZW50VHlwZXM6OlNlcnZpY2UvNTE4OQ"
  "library_name" = "Z2lkOi8vb3BzbGV2ZWwvQ29tcG9uZW50VHlwZXM6OlNlcnZpY2UvNTE5Mg"
  "microservice_tag_to_tag" = "Z2lkOi8vb3BzbGV2ZWwvQ29tcG9uZW50VHlwZXM6OlNlcnZpY2UvNTE5NQ"
  "mobile_with_prefix" = "Z2lkOi8vb3BzbGV2ZWwvQ29tcG9uZW50VHlwZXM6OlNlcnZpY2UvNTE5MA"
  "no_owner" = "Z2lkOi8vb3BzbGV2ZWwvQ29tcG9uZW50VHlwZXM6OlNlcnZpY2UvNTE4OA"
  "no_owner_block" = "Z2lkOi8vb3BzbGV2ZWwvQ29tcG9uZW50VHlwZXM6OlNlcnZpY2UvNTE4Nw"
  "owner_empty_rules" = "Z2lkOi8vb3BzbGV2ZWwvQ29tcG9uZW50VHlwZXM6OlNlcnZpY2UvNTE5MQ"
  "owner_no_rules" = "Z2lkOi8vb3BzbGV2ZWwvQ29tcG9uZW50VHlwZXM6OlNlcnZpY2UvNTE4Ng"
}
test_summary = {
  "edge_cases" = {
    "empty_rules" = "owner_empty_rules"
    "no_block" = "no_owner_block"
    "null_rules" = "owner_no_rules"
  }
  "total_tests" = 10
  "with_management_rules" = 6
  "without_management_rules" = 4
}

We also have support for a new filter on component_category

resource "opslevel_filter" "test_component_category" {
  name = "Test Component Category Filter"
  
  predicate {
    key   = "component_category"
    type  = "equals"
    value = "service"
  }
}

Checklist

• I have run this code, and it appears to resolve the stated issue.
• This PR does not reduce total test coverage
• This PR has no user interface changes or has already received approval from product management to change the interface.
• Make a changie entry that explains the customer facing outcome of this change

[andrewstillv15]

pertains to this bit of feedback.

[andrewstillv15]

pertains to this bit of feedback.

[andrewstillv15]

pertaining to this request.

[derek-etherton-opslevel]

LGTM. Nice job with the refactoring to move management rules into its own area, and the thorough functional tests