Skip to content

sync up 2026.3.28#3

Open
tearsofphoenix wants to merge 5261 commits intoPanda-Intelligence:mainfrom
openclaw:main
Open

sync up 2026.3.28#3
tearsofphoenix wants to merge 5261 commits intoPanda-Intelligence:mainfrom
openclaw:main

Conversation

@tearsofphoenix
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Describe the problem and fix in 2–5 bullets:

  • Problem:
  • Why it matters:
  • What changed:
  • What did NOT change (scope boundary):

Change Type (select all)

  • Bug fix
  • Feature
  • Refactor required for the fix
  • Docs
  • Security hardening
  • Chore/infra

Scope (select all touched areas)

  • Gateway / orchestration
  • Skills / tool execution
  • Auth / tokens
  • Memory / storage
  • Integrations
  • API / contracts
  • UI / DX
  • CI/CD / infra

Linked Issue/PR

  • Closes #
  • Related #
  • This PR fixes a bug or regression

Root Cause / Regression History (if applicable)

For bug fixes or regressions, explain why this happened, not just what changed. Otherwise write N/A. If the cause is unclear, write Unknown.

  • Root cause:
  • Missing detection / guardrail:
  • Prior context (git blame, prior PR, issue, or refactor if known):
  • Why this regressed now:
  • If unknown, what was ruled out:

Regression Test Plan (if applicable)

For bug fixes or regressions, name the smallest reliable test coverage that should have caught this. Otherwise write N/A.

  • Coverage level that should have caught this:
    • Unit test
    • Seam / integration test
    • End-to-end test
    • Existing coverage already sufficient
  • Target test or file:
  • Scenario the test should lock in:
  • Why this is the smallest reliable guardrail:
  • Existing test that already covers this (if any):
  • If no new test is added, why not:

User-visible / Behavior Changes

List user-visible changes (including defaults/config).
If none, write None.

Security Impact (required)

  • New permissions/capabilities? (Yes/No)
  • Secrets/tokens handling changed? (Yes/No)
  • New/changed network calls? (Yes/No)
  • Command/tool execution surface changed? (Yes/No)
  • Data access scope changed? (Yes/No)
  • If any Yes, explain risk + mitigation:

Repro + Verification

Environment

  • OS:
  • Runtime/container:
  • Model/provider:
  • Integration/channel (if any):
  • Relevant config (redacted):

Steps

Expected

Actual

Evidence

Attach at least one:

  • Failing test/log before + passing after
  • Trace/log snippets
  • Screenshot/recording
  • Perf numbers (if relevant)

Human Verification (required)

What you personally verified (not just CI), and how:

  • Verified scenarios:
  • Edge cases checked:
  • What you did not verify:

Review Conversations

  • I replied to or resolved every bot review conversation I addressed in this PR.
  • I left unresolved only the conversations that still need reviewer or maintainer judgment.

If a bot review conversation is addressed by this PR, resolve that conversation yourself. Do not leave bot review conversation cleanup for maintainers.

Compatibility / Migration

  • Backward compatible? (Yes/No)
  • Config/env changes? (Yes/No)
  • Migration needed? (Yes/No)
  • If yes, exact upgrade steps:

Failure Recovery (if this breaks)

  • How to disable/revert this change quickly:
  • Files/config to restore:
  • Known bad symptoms reviewers should watch for:

Risks and Mitigations

List only real risks for this PR. Add/remove entries as needed. If none, write None.

  • Risk:
    • Mitigation:

steipete and others added 30 commits April 5, 2026 23:53
* Lobster: run workflows in process

* docs: note in-process lobster runtime

* docs: add lobster changelog attribution
vincentkoc and others added 30 commits April 6, 2026 06:07
…60356)

Merged via squash.

Prepared head SHA: 7d58bef
Co-authored-by: openperf <80630709+openperf@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: jalehman <550978+jalehman@users.noreply.github.com>
Reviewed-by: @jalehman
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants