Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While initializing
mul_factorto 1 is the correct fix, the code can be made more robust. The type ofmul_factoris inferred by the compiler and could overflow ifnis large (e.g., > 31). To prevent potential overflows and align with the implementation in therangeprooffunction, it's better to explicitly typemul_factorasu128and convert it to a circuit variable before the multiplication.A similar issue exists for
constanton line 428, which would also benefit from an explicit type likeu128to prevent potential overflows.