Conversation
edd0f7a to
73d1a99
Compare
e669680 to
d4bcaf5
Compare
|
Thanks and sorry for the delays - hoping to review this tonight. |
davidhewitt
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, functionality is looking great! Really really pleased to have this for 0.16 !
Got a few comments about docs, tests, and parsing reprs.
|
Thanks for the reviews! Sorry for the typos and grammatical errors,I'm not very fluent in English 😓. Hope that doesn't make this PR too difficult to review... I've fixed all errors in docs and comments. Will fix the code later. (By the way, when I fix an error, I also mark the corresponding conversation as "resolved". That is, I use "resolve conversation" as a way to say "I think your suggestion is good and edited my PR accordingly". Is it okay or too confusing? I'm not familiar with open source practices...) |
|
Don't worry, perfect English is not a requirement. I just happen to spot those easily 😄 Marking conversations as resolved is exactly right for "done" changes, I think. |
3f01dc9 to
6f1927f
Compare
|
I have rebased this PR. I also squashed some commits. Hopefully the granularity is better than my previous PRs. Can you review this again? |
birkenfeld
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM now, but clippy and the tests are failing...
|
Sorry, there have been some issues on my machine.. rustc 1.57 makes |
b933efe to
720708a
Compare
davidhewitt
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry this has taken me some time to get to again. Looks great!
I have just a couple of tiny suggestions, including how to fix the MSRV job.
Also needs a rebase to fix merge conflict.
After that, let's merge this. Thank you again for this really great feature contribution!
720708a to
78f5afc
Compare
|
Thanks again for this - I've just rebased it and will merge shortly! |
Closes #834
Closes #2013