feat: Use emoji for risk to improve glance focus#52
feat: Use emoji for risk to improve glance focus#52arlobelshee wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
…can search by risk-aware instead.
Still has the migration guide.
|
We can decouple the notion of 4 levels of risk from the actual annotation used, and let teams choose the style that suits their context. Risk levels
Notation suggestions
|
That's an interesting suggestion. Do you have the space to push a commit to this PR branch with a concrete approach to apply it? I tried, but struggled. In particular, I wanted to keep the table that introduces the risk levels very concrete. I felt removing the codes from that table raises the level of abstraction. It requires people to tie a concept to a name, then a name to the encoding. That's harder than tying a name, a concept, and an encoding all together as one thing. So perhaps the table gives the primary encoding, then we state alternate notation suggestions? Or something like that? Anyway, I could use some help in finding the most clear way to describe this. |
|
I'll see what I can do |
We want to maximize the ability to glance at a git summary and instantly see the right things to pay attention to. Do emoji help?