A fair comparison of LaunchSim with other popular rocket simulation tools.
| Software | Price | Platform | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| LaunchSim | Free | Browser (any device) | Quick simulations, launch day, beginners |
| OpenRocket | Free | Windows/Mac/Linux (Java) | Detailed design, component library |
| RockSim | $124 | Windows/Mac | Professional use, extensive database |
| RASAero II | Free | Windows | High-speed/supersonic rockets |
Strengths:
- Zero installation — runs in any browser
- Works on phones, tablets, and computers
- Real-time weather integration
- 3D flight visualization with terrain
- Launch day tools (GO/NO-GO, checklists)
- Altimeter data import (11+ formats)
- GPS tracking for recovery
- Club sharing and competitions
- Modern, clean interface
Limitations:
- Smaller component database than established tools
- Newer software with less community validation
- No OBJ export for 3D printing
- Transonic/supersonic accuracy not validated
Best for: Quick simulations, launch day operations, beginners, mobile use
Strengths:
- Mature, well-validated physics engine
- Extensive component database
- Large community and support
- 6-DOF simulation
- Automatic design optimization
- Export to RockSim/RASAero formats
- OBJ export for 3D printing
- Open source (GPL)
- Android app available
Limitations:
- Requires Java installation
- Desktop-only (no browser version)
- No real-time weather integration
- Basic 3D visualization
- No launch day tools
- Interface feels dated to some users
Best for: Detailed rocket design, optimization, community support
Strengths:
- Most extensive component database
- Well-established (since 1997)
- Detailed CG tracking as motor burns
- Good documentation
- Professional support from Apogee
Limitations:
- $124 cost
- Windows/Mac only (no mobile)
- No browser version
- Some users report less accuracy than OpenRocket
- Proprietary (closed source)
- Copy protection
Best for: Users who want commercial support, extensive built-in database
Strengths:
- Excellent for supersonic simulations
- Detailed aerodynamic coefficients
- Free to use
- Good for high-altitude rockets
Limitations:
- Windows only
- Steeper learning curve
- Complex rocket designs harder to enter
- Limited to aerodynamic analysis
- No recovery simulation
Best for: High-power rockets, supersonic flights, aerodynamic analysis
| Feature | LaunchSim | OpenRocket | RockSim | RASAero II |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free | $124 | Free |
| Browser-based | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Mobile support | ✅ | Android only | ❌ | ❌ |
| No installation | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| 6-DOF physics | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Barrowman stability | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Monte Carlo | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
| Multi-stage | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Clustering | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Design optimization | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
| 3D visualization | ✅ Advanced | ✅ Basic | ✅ Basic | ❌ |
| Real-time weather | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Launch day tools | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Altimeter import | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| GPS tracking | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Club sharing | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| KML export | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| OBJ export (3D print) | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Component database | 180+ | 1000+ | 2000+ | Limited |
| OpenRocket import | ✅ | N/A | ✅ | ✅ |
| Supersonic accuracy | ✅ | |||
| Open source | ✅ MIT | ✅ GPL | ❌ | ❌ |
- Want to simulate without installing software
- Need launch day weather and GO/NO-GO assessment
- Want 3D flight visualization
- Import altimeter data to compare with simulations
- Use a phone or tablet at the launch site
- Are new to rocketry and want an easy start
- Want GPS tracking for recovery
- Need the most validated physics engine
- Want extensive community support
- Need automatic design optimization
- Want to export designs for 3D printing
- Prefer a mature, battle-tested tool
- Want commercial support
- Need the largest component database
- Prefer proprietary software with a company behind it
- Don't mind paying $124
- Build supersonic rockets
- Need detailed aerodynamic coefficients
- Want to validate drag predictions
- Are comfortable with a technical interface
Many rocketeers use multiple simulators to cross-check results. A common workflow:
- Design in OpenRocket (best component library)
- Validate aerodynamics in RASAero II (for high-speed)
- Launch day use LaunchSim (weather, mobile access, GO/NO-GO)
- Post-flight import altimeter data to LaunchSim to compare
LaunchSim imports OpenRocket (.ork) files, so you can design elsewhere and use LaunchSim for launch day operations.
All simulation software makes assumptions and simplifications. Real-world factors that affect accuracy:
- Surface finish variations
- Manufacturing tolerances
- Wind gusts and turbulence
- Motor performance variations
- Temperature effects on propellant
Recommendation: Use simulations for planning, but always build in safety margins. No simulator perfectly predicts reality.
| If you want... | Use |
|---|---|
| Zero-install, browser-based | LaunchSim |
| Most mature/validated | OpenRocket |
| Commercial support | RockSim |
| Supersonic analysis | RASAero II |
| Launch day tools | LaunchSim |
| 3D printing export | OpenRocket |
| Mobile/tablet use | LaunchSim |
This comparison was created to be fair and objective. If you find any inaccuracies, please open an issue.