Skip to content

Smoke Test Guide and Checklist added in smoke-test-doc.md file#105

Open
rustom-yadav wants to merge 1 commit into
SahilKumar75:mainfrom
rustom-yadav:smoke-test-doc-add
Open

Smoke Test Guide and Checklist added in smoke-test-doc.md file#105
rustom-yadav wants to merge 1 commit into
SahilKumar75:mainfrom
rustom-yadav:smoke-test-doc-add

Conversation

@rustom-yadav
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@rustom-yadav rustom-yadav commented May 13, 2026

Hi, I have added a new documentation file smoke-test-doc.md inside the docs/ folder.

What's inside:

  • Added a step-by-step guide for performing smoke tests.

  • Included a checklist to verify the core functionality of the project after a build.

  • Note: No existing code or logic was modified; this is a documentation-only PR to help improve the testing workflow.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added comprehensive smoke-test verification documentation including app startup checks, navigation verification, web export testing, and checklist templates for quality assurance workflows.

Review Change Stack

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 13, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR adds a new documentation file docs/smoke-test-doc.md that establishes a standardized smoke-test verification workflow for the Expo app. The document provides scope checklist items, detailed pre-submission testing steps (including startup verification, navigation validation, and web export testing), and structured checklist templates with environment and evidence collection fields.

Changes

Smoke-Test Verification Documentation

Layer / File(s) Summary
Smoke-test workflow documentation
docs/smoke-test-doc.md
Complete smoke-test documentation with purpose statement, scope definition (app startup, web export, navigation paths), pre-submission checklist with step-by-step testing instructions (including npm run dev and npx expo export --platform web commands), template checklist items for verification, and fields for environment details and evidence (screenshots/recordings).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related issues

Poem

🐰 A document hops in with care,
Smoke tests and checklists everywhere!
Startup, export, navigation true,
Evidence gathered, all shiny new. ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description covers the key aspects of the change (new documentation file, contents, and scope), but is missing several required template sections such as Linked Issue, Verification steps, Review Notes, and Risks And Follow-Up. Add missing template sections: specify any linked issue, include verification steps (or mark as N/A for documentation-only), provide review notes, and document any risks or follow-up items needed.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the main change: adding a smoke test guide and checklist documentation file, which directly aligns with the PR's objective of introducing new testing workflow documentation.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Tip

💬 Introducing Slack Agent: The best way for teams to turn conversations into code.

Slack Agent is built on CodeRabbit's deep understanding of your code, so your team can collaborate across the entire SDLC without losing context.

  • Generate code and open pull requests
  • Plan features and break down work
  • Investigate incidents and troubleshoot customer tickets together
  • Automate recurring tasks and respond to alerts with triggers
  • Summarize progress and report instantly

Built for teams:

  • Shared memory across your entire org—no repeating context
  • Per-thread sandboxes to safely plan and execute work
  • Governance built-in—scoped access, auditability, and budget controls

One agent for your entire SDLC. Right inside Slack.

👉 Get started


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@docs/smoke-test-doc.md`:
- Around line 10-11: Remove all unresolved citation placeholders "[cite: 1]"
from the document text (e.g., occurrences in lines like "The web export process
functions correctly[cite: 1]" and similar occurrences at the noted ranges);
simply delete the "[cite: 1]" tokens or replace them with proper references if
you have them, ensuring sentences read cleanly (e.g., "The web export process
functions correctly"). Search the file for the exact token "[cite: 1]" and
remove or replace each instance so there are no leftover draft citation markers.
- Around line 31-34: The markdown opens a fenced code block with "```bash"
around the command "npx expo export --platform web" but never closes it, causing
the checklist header "### ✅ Smoke-Test Checklist" to be rendered inside the code
block; fix by adding a closing "```" immediately after the command so the code
block ends and the checklist heading renders correctly (look for the "```bash"
line and the "npx expo export --platform web" command to place the closing
fence).
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 9c425207-b0a0-4edd-aba8-e0249cfbe078

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7e1203d and a2fae45.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/smoke-test-doc.md

Comment thread docs/smoke-test-doc.md
Comment on lines +10 to +11
2. The web export process functions correctly[cite: 1].
3. Key navigation paths are operational[cite: 1].
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win

Remove unresolved citation placeholders ([cite: 1]).

These markers appear to be draft artifacts and there is no citation section backing them. Keeping them in contributor docs is confusing.

Also applies to: 19-22, 24-27, 29-30, 35-39

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@docs/smoke-test-doc.md` around lines 10 - 11, Remove all unresolved citation
placeholders "[cite: 1]" from the document text (e.g., occurrences in lines like
"The web export process functions correctly[cite: 1]" and similar occurrences at
the noted ranges); simply delete the "[cite: 1]" tokens or replace them with
proper references if you have them, ensuring sentences read cleanly (e.g., "The
web export process functions correctly"). Search the file for the exact token
"[cite: 1]" and remove or replace each instance so there are no leftover draft
citation markers.

Comment thread docs/smoke-test-doc.md
Comment on lines +31 to +34
```bash
npx expo export --platform web

### ✅ Smoke-Test Checklist
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

# Find and examine the smoke test documentation file
fd -t f "smoke-test-doc.md" --exec cat -n {} \;

Repository: SahilKumar75/sentri

Length of output: 2169


Close the unclosed fenced code block.

Line 31 opens a bash code fence that is never closed. The checklist content starting at line 34 is incorrectly rendered as part of the code block, breaking the markdown formatting of the heading and checklist items.

Suggested fix
  ```bash
  npx expo export --platform web
+  ```

  ### ✅ Smoke-Test Checklist
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
```bash
npx expo export --platform web
### ✅ Smoke-Test Checklist
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@docs/smoke-test-doc.md` around lines 31 - 34, The markdown opens a fenced
code block with "```bash" around the command "npx expo export --platform web"
but never closes it, causing the checklist header "### ✅ Smoke-Test Checklist"
to be rendered inside the code block; fix by adding a closing "```" immediately
after the command so the code block ends and the checklist heading renders
correctly (look for the "```bash" line and the "npx expo export --platform web"
command to place the closing fence).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant