Create bandit.yml by Smartappli · Pull Request #856 · Smartappli/AIMER

Smartappli · 2026-04-14T22:33:44Z

Summary by CodeRabbit

Chores
- Implemented automated security scanning for Python code to identify potential vulnerabilities. The scanning workflow now runs automatically on all code changes and pull requests targeting the main development branch, plus on a weekly schedule.

gemini-code-assist · 2026-04-14T22:33:49Z

Note

Gemini is unable to generate a review for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported.

coderabbitai · 2026-04-14T22:34:15Z

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow is added to perform automated Bandit security scans on Python code. The workflow triggers on pushes to the master branch, pull requests targeting master, and runs on a weekly schedule. It executes the Python Bandit security scanner with exit code success configured regardless of scan results.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Bandit Security Workflow `.github/workflows/bandit.yml`	New GitHub Actions workflow configured to run Python Bandit security scans on push to master, pull requests, and weekly schedule. Includes repository permissions for reading contents and writing security events, uses `shundor/python-bandit-scan` action, and allows workflow completion even when security issues are detected.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

🐰 A bandit scanner hops into the fold,
Guarding our Python code, brave and bold,
Weekly scans dance through the master branch's stream,
Security checks now part of our CI/CD dream! 🔐

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'Create bandit.yml' is generic and lacks specificity about the security scanning purpose or workflow functionality.	Consider revising the title to better convey the intent, such as 'Add Bandit security scanning workflow' or 'Setup automated Python security analysis with Bandit'.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

Create PR with unit tests
Commit unit tests in branch Smartappli-patch-1

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

github-advanced-security · 2026-04-14T22:34:18Z

You are seeing this message because GitHub Code Scanning has recently been set up for this repository, or this pull request contains the workflow file for the Code Scanning tool.

What Enabling Code Scanning Means:

The 'Security' tab will display more code scanning analysis results (e.g., for the default branch).
Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results.
You will be able to see the analysis results for the pull request's branch on this overview once the scans have completed and the checks have passed.

For more information about GitHub Code Scanning, check out the documentation.

codacy-production · 2026-04-14T22:35:16Z

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

_{TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes. Give us feedback}

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ff25d37199

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-04-14T22:35:19Z

+    branches: [ "master" ]
+  pull_request:
+    # The branches below must be a subset of the branches above
+    branches: [ "master" ]


Use the repository default branch in workflow triggers

The workflow is configured to run on master, but this repository’s active branch is main; with no master branch, neither the push nor pull_request trigger will fire, so Bandit only runs on the weekly cron and misses security scans during normal development/PR flow.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

coderabbitai

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In @.github/workflows/bandit.yml:
- Line 37: The Bandit workflow is currently non-blocking because the job sets
exit_zero: true; change the Bandit job configuration (the bandit job entry that
contains exit_zero) to remove or set exit_zero to false for push/pull_request
runs so failures block merges, and if you still want non-blocking scheduled
scans create a separate scheduled job/step with exit_zero: true instead of
making the main bandit job non-blocking.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: d9862a80-2031-41c8-b965-66b4546ab7e4

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4dd3cf2 and ff25d37.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

.github/workflows/bandit.yml

coderabbitai · 2026-04-14T22:37:17Z

+        uses: shundor/python-bandit-scan@ab1d87dfccc5a0ffab88be3aaac6ffe35c10d6cd
+        with: # optional arguments
+          # exit with 0, even with results found
+          exit_zero: true # optional, default is DEFAULT


⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

🧩 Analysis chain

🌐 Web query:

For the action shundor/python-bandit-scan, confirm how exit_zerobehaves and whether settingexit_zero: false causes non-zero exit on detected Bandit issues.

💡 Result:

The exit_zero input in the shundor/python-bandit-scan GitHub Action controls whether the action exits with code 0 even if Bandit detects security issues. Setting exit_zero: true forces exit code 0 regardless of findings (default behavior appears to allow non-zero exit on issues). Setting exit_zero: false explicitly causes non-zero exit when Bandit issues are detected, enabling CI/CD failure on security problems. This matches standard Bandit CLI behavior (--exit-zero flag, as in PyCQA/bandit issue #419) and is confirmed in the action's README: "exit_zero Optional Exit with 0, even with results found (set "true" to use it)". Usage examples show exit_zero: true to avoid failures.

Citations:

1: https://github.com/shundor/python-bandit-scan

2: https://github.com/shundor/python-bandit-scan/blob/main/README.md

3: https://www.codefactor.io/repository/github/nick2bad4u/internet-archive-upload/source/main/.github/workflows/Bandit.yml

4: https://github.com/aws/mcp-proxy-for-aws/blob/main/.github/workflows/bandit.yml

5: --exit-zero option PyCQA/bandit#419

🏁 Script executed:

cat -n .github/workflows/bandit.yml | head -60

Repository: Smartappli/AIMER

Length of output: 2968

🏁 Script executed:

cat -n .github/workflows/bandit.yml

Repository: Smartappli/AIMER

Length of output: 2968

Make Bandit blocking for merge paths (Line 37).

exit_zero: true makes the job pass even when Bandit finds issues, so PR/push protection is effectively disabled.

Suggested minimal fix

- exit_zero: true # optional, default is DEFAULT + exit_zero: false # fail job when findings are present

If you want scheduled runs to remain non-blocking, keep blocking on push/pull_request and use a separate scheduled step/job with relaxed behavior.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

exit_zero: true # optional, default is DEFAULT

exit_zero: false # fail job when findings are present

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In @.github/workflows/bandit.yml at line 37, The Bandit workflow is currently non-blocking because the job sets exit_zero: true; change the Bandit job configuration (the bandit job entry that contains exit_zero) to remove or set exit_zero to false for push/pull_request runs so failures block merges, and if you still want non-blocking scheduled scans create a separate scheduled job/step with exit_zero: true instead of making the main bandit job non-blocking.

Create bandit.yml

ff25d37

Smartappli enabled auto-merge April 14, 2026 22:34

Smartappli disabled auto-merge April 14, 2026 22:34

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Apr 14, 2026

View reviewed changes

Smartappli enabled auto-merge April 14, 2026 22:35

coderabbitai Bot requested changes Apr 14, 2026

View reviewed changes

Smartappli disabled auto-merge April 15, 2026 14:18

Smartappli closed this Apr 15, 2026

Smartappli deleted the Smartappli-patch-1 branch May 25, 2026 18:40

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Create bandit.yml#856

Create bandit.yml#856
Smartappli wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
Smartappli-patch-1

Smartappli commented Apr 14, 2026 •

edited by coderabbitai Bot

Loading

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist Bot commented Apr 14, 2026

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 14, 2026 •

edited

Loading

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Uh oh!

github-advanced-security AI commented Apr 14, 2026

Uh oh!

codacy-production Bot commented Apr 14, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot Apr 14, 2026

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot Apr 14, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

	exit_zero: true # optional, default is DEFAULT
	exit_zero: false # fail job when findings are present

Uh oh!

Conversation

Smartappli commented Apr 14, 2026 • edited by coderabbitai Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Summary by CodeRabbit

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist Bot commented Apr 14, 2026

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 14, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Walkthrough

Changes

Estimated code review effort

Poem

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Uh oh!

github-advanced-security AI commented Apr 14, 2026

What Enabling Code Scanning Means:

Uh oh!

codacy-production Bot commented Apr 14, 2026

Up to standards ✅

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot Apr 14, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot Apr 14, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Smartappli commented Apr 14, 2026 •

edited by coderabbitai Bot

Loading

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 14, 2026 •

edited

Loading