Add Codacy security scan workflow#896
Conversation
This workflow integrates Codacy security scans with GitHub Advanced Security, checking code on push and pull requests to the master branch, and scheduling scans weekly.
|
Note Gemini is unable to generate a review for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported. |
WalkthroughIntroduces a new GitHub Actions workflow for Codacy security scanning. Runs on Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 60 minutes.Comment |
Up to standards ✅🟢 Issues
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 2e1dc872e5
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| branches: [ "master" ] | ||
| pull_request: | ||
| # The branches below must be a subset of the branches above | ||
| branches: [ "master" ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Target the active default branch for workflow triggers
This workflow only runs for push/pull_request on master, but this repository currently has main (and no master) as an active branch, so the scan will never run on normal PRs or pushes and only executes on the weekly cron. That means new security findings won’t be surfaced during code review, which defeats the intended PR-time protection.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In @.github/workflows/codacy.yml:
- Line 39: Change the mutable action tags to immutable commit SHAs: replace the
literal "uses: actions/checkout@v4" and the other "uses: ...@v3" entry
referenced in the file with their corresponding full commit SHA pins (the same
pattern used for the Codacy action on line 43), fetching the canonical commit
SHAs from the official GitHub Action repos and updating both uses: lines so the
workflow references fixed commits rather than version tags.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 02f7f09d-a2bf-4eaa-b0fa-b8f306a0107a
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/codacy.yml
| steps: | ||
| # Checkout the repository to the GitHub Actions runner | ||
| - name: Checkout code | ||
| uses: actions/checkout@v4 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify workflows still using mutable action tags instead of full SHAs
rg -nP '^\s*uses:\s*[^@\s]+@v[0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?\s*$' .github/workflowsRepository: Smartappli/AIMER
Length of output: 3349
🏁 Script executed:
cat -n .github/workflows/codacy.ymlRepository: Smartappli/AIMER
Length of output: 2951
Pin all uses: actions to immutable commit SHAs.
Lines 39 and 59 use mutable version tags (@v4 and @v3), leaving a supply-chain window if tags are moved upstream. Pin to full commit SHAs as you already did on line 43 with the Codacy action.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In @.github/workflows/codacy.yml at line 39, Change the mutable action tags to
immutable commit SHAs: replace the literal "uses: actions/checkout@v4" and the
other "uses: ...@v3" entry referenced in the file with their corresponding full
commit SHA pins (the same pattern used for the Codacy action on line 43),
fetching the canonical commit SHAs from the official GitHub Action repos and
updating both uses: lines so the workflow references fixed commits rather than
version tags.
This workflow integrates Codacy security scans with GitHub Advanced Security, checking code on push and pull requests to the master branch, and scheduling scans weekly.
Summary by CodeRabbit