⚡ Bolt: Optimize TokenBucketLimiter refill allocation#8
⚡ Bolt: Optimize TokenBucketLimiter refill allocation#8google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Replaces `AtomicInteger.updateAndGet` with a manual `compareAndSet` loop in `TokenBucketLimiter.refill()` to eliminate lambda allocation in the hot path. Adds explicit overflow checks for token calculation and accumulation to ensure correctness with large values.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
⚡ Bolt: Optimized TokenBucketLimiter refill
💡 What:
AtomicInteger.updateAndGetwith a manualcompareAndSetloop inTokenBucketLimiter.refill().periodsElapsed * refillTokens.current + tokensToAddusinglongarithmetic.🎯 Why:
updateAndGetmethod allocates a lambda object on every successful refill, creating unnecessary GC pressure in high-throughput scenarios.periodsElapsedwas very large (long sleep/suspend) or if the bucket was near capacity.📊 Impact:
🔬 Measurement:
./gradlew test), specificallytestThreadSafetywhich hammers the limiter concurrently.PR created automatically by Jules for task 51746987566456691 started by @SpaceLeam