Introduce Worker Label type definition for extended and classic#1051
Conversation
1c8e8dd to
0ec9824
Compare
|
@CGNonofr are you ok with these changes? |
0ec9824 to
ef10b70
Compare
CGNonofr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What about doing that on the monaco-vscode-api side? 🤔
Should we move the type definitions to monaco-vscode-api? |
It probably makes more sense 🤔 |
|
@CGNonofr what about we merge this first and then open a new PR in mva. And drop the definitions again with the new release. That should be straight-forward. |
It looks more complicated to me but feel free to do it as you wish :) |
Upside: Clearer what are allowed worker names.
Downside: Needs to be maintained, but I think it's ok.
Fixes #1038