Open
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughTetris 게임의 Input 클래스에 코루틴 기반 비동기 입력 처리 기능을 추가했습니다. 기존 블로킹 스레드 방식 API는 유지하면서 Channel을 통한 새로운 비동기 메서드들을 도입하여 입력 처리 방식을 확장했습니다. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12분 Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@20260218-3files/src/tetris/Input.kt`:
- Around line 76-77: The Channel<Action> created as private val channel =
Channel<Action>(Channel.CONFLATED) isn't closed; update stopAsync() to call
channel.close() after cancelling the scope (or before) to properly release the
channel resource, and ensure any places that send to channel (uses of
channel.send/trySend) handle or avoid sends after stopAsync() to prevent
ClosedSendChannelException; reference the properties scope, channel and the
stopAsync() method when making the change.
- Around line 97-99: The pollAsync() function is marked suspend but uses
channel.tryReceive() which is non-suspending, so remove the unnecessary suspend
modifier on pollAsync to make it a regular (non-suspending) function matching
the non-blocking behavior of poll(); update the function signature of
pollAsync() (and any callers) to a non-suspending function that returns Action
and keep the existing body returning channel.tryReceive().getOrNull() ?:
Action.NONE.
- Around line 4-5: The file imports kotlinx.coroutines and Channel which
violates the "pure Kotlin standard library" rule; remove all kotlinx-coroutines
imports and any uses of CoroutineScope/launch/Channel in Input.kt and replace
them with a Thread-based producer/consumer using
java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue (or a synchronized Kotlin
MutableList) for queued key events and a dedicated input Thread that polls the
queue; use Thread.sleep(...) for timing control in any polling loops and signal
consumption via simple polling or wait/notify, and update methods that
referenced Channel.send/receive or coroutine jobs to push/pop from the queue and
to start/stop the input Thread instead.
- Around line 79-95: The call to parseEscapeSequence() from startAsync()
performs blocking System.in.read() outside the IO dispatcher: make
parseEscapeSequence a suspend function (or ensure its internal blocking reads
are wrapped) and run it inside the IO context used for System.in.read();
specifically, either (A) change parseEscapeSequence to suspend and run it via
withContext(Dispatchers.IO) so all System.in.read() calls execute on the IO
dispatcher, or (B) modify parseEscapeSequence to wrap its internal
System.in.read() calls with withContext(Dispatchers.IO) (or accept an injected
Reader/BufferedInputStream already using the IO dispatcher) so no blocking I/O
happens on the main coroutine context; update startAsync to call the suspend
version accordingly and keep channel.send(...) behavior unchanged.
- Around line 101-103: In stopAsync(), you only call scope.cancel() but must
also close the coroutine Channel to fully release resources; update the
stopAsync() function to call channel.close() (or channel.close(cause) if you
want to surface the cancellation cause) after cancelling the scope, and guard
the close with a safe check/try-catch if the channel may already be closed;
ensure you reference stopAsync(), scope.cancel(), and channel.close() in the
change.
Comment on lines
+4
to
+5
| import kotlinx.coroutines.* | ||
| import kotlinx.coroutines.channels.Channel |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
코딩 가이드라인 위반: kotlinx-coroutines 외부 의존성 사용 불가
프로젝트 코딩 가이드라인에 명시된 바와 같이, 이 프로젝트는 순수 Kotlin 표준 라이브러리만 사용해야 하며 kotlinx-coroutines와 같은 외부 의존성 도입이 금지되어 있습니다. 타이밍 제어에는 Thread.sleep()을, 비동기 입력 처리에는 기존 Thread 기반 방식을 사용해야 합니다.
코루틴 기반 비동기 API 대신 기존 Thread + ConcurrentLinkedQueue 패턴을 확장하는 방식을 고려해 주세요.
As per coding guidelines: "Use pure Kotlin standard library only - do not introduce external dependencies like kotlinx-coroutines, use Thread.sleep() for timing control instead of ScheduledExecutor or Coroutines"
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@20260218-3files/src/tetris/Input.kt` around lines 4 - 5, The file imports
kotlinx.coroutines and Channel which violates the "pure Kotlin standard library"
rule; remove all kotlinx-coroutines imports and any uses of
CoroutineScope/launch/Channel in Input.kt and replace them with a Thread-based
producer/consumer using java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue (or a
synchronized Kotlin MutableList) for queued key events and a dedicated input
Thread that polls the queue; use Thread.sleep(...) for timing control in any
polling loops and signal consumption via simple polling or wait/notify, and
update methods that referenced Channel.send/receive or coroutine jobs to
push/pop from the queue and to start/stop the input Thread instead.
Comment on lines
+76
to
+77
| private val scope = CoroutineScope(Dispatchers.IO) | ||
| private val channel = Channel<Action>(Channel.CONFLATED) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Channel 리소스 관리 누락
Channel이 선언되었지만 stopAsync()에서 scope.cancel()만 호출하고 channel.close()를 호출하지 않습니다. 가이드라인 위반과 별개로, 코루틴을 사용한다면 리소스 정리가 필요합니다.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@20260218-3files/src/tetris/Input.kt` around lines 76 - 77, The
Channel<Action> created as private val channel =
Channel<Action>(Channel.CONFLATED) isn't closed; update stopAsync() to call
channel.close() after cancelling the scope (or before) to properly release the
channel resource, and ensure any places that send to channel (uses of
channel.send/trySend) handle or avoid sends after stopAsync() to prevent
ClosedSendChannelException; reference the properties scope, channel and the
stopAsync() method when making the change.
Comment on lines
+79
to
+95
| fun startAsync() { | ||
| scope.launch { | ||
| while (isActive) { | ||
| val b = withContext(Dispatchers.IO) { System.`in`.read() } | ||
| if (b == -1) continue | ||
| val action = when (b) { | ||
| 27 -> parseEscapeSequence() | ||
| 32 -> Action.HARD_DROP | ||
| 113, 81 -> Action.QUIT | ||
| else -> Action.NONE | ||
| } | ||
| if (action != Action.NONE) { | ||
| channel.send(action) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
parseEscapeSequence() 호출 시 블로킹 I/O 문제
가이드라인 위반 이슈와 별개로, 구현 자체에도 문제가 있습니다. Line 82에서 withContext(Dispatchers.IO)로 System.in.read()를 래핑했지만, Line 85에서 호출하는 parseEscapeSequence()는 내부적으로 System.in.read()를 직접 호출합니다. 이는 Dispatchers.IO 컨텍스트 밖에서 블로킹 I/O를 수행하게 됩니다.
만약 코루틴 사용이 허용된다면 수정 제안
fun startAsync() {
scope.launch {
while (isActive) {
- val b = withContext(Dispatchers.IO) { System.`in`.read() }
- if (b == -1) continue
- val action = when (b) {
- 27 -> parseEscapeSequence()
- 32 -> Action.HARD_DROP
- 113, 81 -> Action.QUIT
- else -> Action.NONE
- }
+ val action = withContext(Dispatchers.IO) {
+ val b = System.`in`.read()
+ if (b == -1) return@withContext Action.NONE
+ when (b) {
+ 27 -> parseEscapeSequence()
+ 32 -> Action.HARD_DROP
+ 113, 81 -> Action.QUIT
+ else -> Action.NONE
+ }
+ }
if (action != Action.NONE) {
channel.send(action)
}
}
}
}🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@20260218-3files/src/tetris/Input.kt` around lines 79 - 95, The call to
parseEscapeSequence() from startAsync() performs blocking System.in.read()
outside the IO dispatcher: make parseEscapeSequence a suspend function (or
ensure its internal blocking reads are wrapped) and run it inside the IO context
used for System.in.read(); specifically, either (A) change parseEscapeSequence
to suspend and run it via withContext(Dispatchers.IO) so all System.in.read()
calls execute on the IO dispatcher, or (B) modify parseEscapeSequence to wrap
its internal System.in.read() calls with withContext(Dispatchers.IO) (or accept
an injected Reader/BufferedInputStream already using the IO dispatcher) so no
blocking I/O happens on the main coroutine context; update startAsync to call
the suspend version accordingly and keep channel.send(...) behavior unchanged.
Comment on lines
+97
to
+99
| suspend fun pollAsync(): Action { | ||
| return channel.tryReceive().getOrNull() ?: Action.NONE | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
불필요한 suspend 수정자
tryReceive()는 suspend 함수가 아니며 즉시 반환됩니다. 현재 구현에서 suspend 키워드는 불필요하며 호출자에게 혼란을 줄 수 있습니다. 기존 poll() 메서드와 동일하게 non-blocking 동작을 원한다면 suspend를 제거하세요.
수정 제안
- suspend fun pollAsync(): Action {
+ fun pollAsync(): Action {
return channel.tryReceive().getOrNull() ?: Action.NONE
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| suspend fun pollAsync(): Action { | |
| return channel.tryReceive().getOrNull() ?: Action.NONE | |
| } | |
| fun pollAsync(): Action { | |
| return channel.tryReceive().getOrNull() ?: Action.NONE | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@20260218-3files/src/tetris/Input.kt` around lines 97 - 99, The pollAsync()
function is marked suspend but uses channel.tryReceive() which is
non-suspending, so remove the unnecessary suspend modifier on pollAsync to make
it a regular (non-suspending) function matching the non-blocking behavior of
poll(); update the function signature of pollAsync() (and any callers) to a
non-suspending function that returns Action and keep the existing body returning
channel.tryReceive().getOrNull() ?: Action.NONE.
Comment on lines
+101
to
+103
| fun stopAsync() { | ||
| scope.cancel() | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
리소스 정리 불완전
scope.cancel()만 호출하고 channel.close()를 호출하지 않습니다. 완전한 정리를 위해 채널도 닫아야 합니다.
수정 제안
fun stopAsync() {
scope.cancel()
+ channel.close()
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| fun stopAsync() { | |
| scope.cancel() | |
| } | |
| fun stopAsync() { | |
| scope.cancel() | |
| channel.close() | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@20260218-3files/src/tetris/Input.kt` around lines 101 - 103, In stopAsync(),
you only call scope.cancel() but must also close the coroutine Channel to fully
release resources; update the stopAsync() function to call channel.close() (or
channel.close(cause) if you want to surface the cancellation cause) after
cancelling the scope, and guard the close with a safe check/try-catch if the
channel may already be closed; ensure you reference stopAsync(), scope.cancel(),
and channel.close() in the change.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary by CodeRabbit
릴리스 노트