send response to manager on computation termination#3
send response to manager on computation termination#3WashingtonKK wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update introduces enhancements for handling computation stop requests within the ManagerClient. Key changes include a new response message structure for the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant ManagerClient
participant Service
participant EventPublisher
Client->>ManagerClient: Request StopComputation
ManagerClient->>Service: Process StopComputation
Service-->>ManagerClient: Response (StopComputationResponse)
ManagerClient->>Client: Send Response
alt Success
Service->>EventPublisher: Notify Stop Success
else Failure
Service->>EventPublisher: Notify Stop Failure
end
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Signed-off-by: WashingtonKK <washingtonkigan@gmail.com>
WashingtonKK
force-pushed
the
stop-computation-response
branch
from
6a14ac4 to
6266312
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pkg/manager/manager.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (4)
- manager/api/grpc/client.go (1 hunks)
- manager/manager.proto (2 hunks)
- manager/service.go (1 hunks)
- manager/service_test.go (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (11)
manager/manager.proto (2)
24-28: New messageStopComputationResponseadded.The new message structure provides detailed feedback for stopping computations, which is a valuable addition for better communication and error handling.
62-62: FieldstopComputationResadded toClientStreamMessage.The integration of
StopComputationResponseintoClientStreamMessageenhances the message framework by allowing clients to receive detailed responses related to computation stops.manager/api/grpc/client.go (4)
76-78: New response message structure forStopComputation.The new response message structure for
StopComputationincludes the computation ID, which is crucial for identifying the computation being stopped.
80-87: Improved error handling forErrNotFound.The error handling for
ErrNotFoundis well-implemented, ensuring that a clear message is sent back to the client and the computation is marked as not stopped.
88-93: Streamlined error handling for other errors.The error handling for other errors is consistent and ensures that the client receives a detailed error message.
95-96: Success response for stopped computation.The response correctly indicates success when a computation is successfully stopped, enhancing the clarity of the communication protocol.
manager/service_test.go (3)
127-130: Improved test setup with mock components.The introduction of mock components for the provider and VM enhances the test's control over interactions, allowing for more precise validation of behavior.
163-168: Enhanced context formanagerServicein tests.The inclusion of a logger and events channel in the
managerServicestruct provides a more realistic context for testing, improving the test's robustness.
192-195: Added cleanup step foreventsChan.The cleanup step for the
eventsChanensures test isolation and prevents side effects, which is crucial for reliable test results.manager/service.go (2)
170-170: Verify the placement of the successdeferstatement.Ensure that the
deferstatement for the success event is placed appropriately to reflect the intended logic. It should be placed after the computation is successfully stopped and removed from the map.
177-177: LGTM! Use ofdeferfor failure event is appropriate.The
deferstatement for the failure event is well-placed to ensure the event is published if the computation ID is not found.
Signed-off-by: WashingtonKK <washingtonkigan@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pkg/manager/manager.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (2)
- manager/api/grpc/client.go (1 hunks)
- manager/manager.proto (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- manager/api/grpc/client.go
- manager/manager.proto
Signed-off-by: WashingtonKK <washingtonkigan@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- manager/service.go (1 hunks)
- manager/service_test.go (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- manager/service.go
- manager/service_test.go
1 participant
What type of PR is this?
What does this do?
Which issue(s) does this PR fix/relate to?
Have you included tests for your changes?
Did you document any new/modified feature?
Notes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests