Update docs to reflect new automated process for feature grouping#33573
Merged
getdave merged 2 commits intoJul 30, 2021
Conversation
5 tasks
talldan
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2021
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good. The only other thing I did was to ping a few folks who'd worked on, reviewed or merged an uncategorized PR to let them know why the labels are important.
It'd be good to have an automated task do this, but in the meantime it could also be worth mentioning in the docs.
Member
Could we add a logic to |
gziolo
reviewed
Jul 30, 2021
gziolo
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2021
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
In #33229 we added automation to the release tooling to attempt to auto-categorize the grouping of PRs by "feature".
This PR updates the docs to reflect that and to add information on exactly how you should look to curate the changelog in response to what the script will output.
How has this been tested?
Reading and checking for accuracy.
Screenshots
Types of changes
Checklist:
*.native.jsfiles for terms that need renaming or removal).