Improve issue referencing standards in contributing guidelines (#106) #239
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fixes #106
Updates contributing guidelines to recommend full GitHub URLs for issue references instead of shorthand numbers, preventing broken references when code is moved between repositories.
Changes Made
contributing.rst: "enthusiatic" → "enthusiastic"writing_good_commit_messages.rstto recommend full GitHub URLs (e.g.,https://github.com/aboutcode-org/aboutcode/issues/234) for code comments and cross-repository references#234) is acceptable for commit messages within the same repositoryRationale
When code or documentation is moved to a different repository, shorthand issue references (
#123) will point to a completely different issue in the new repo, breaking traceability. Full URLs remain valid regardless of where the code lives.Testing
Before / After
Before: Contributors were instructed to use
#234for all issue referencesAfter: Contributors are now guided to use full URLs for code comments and cross-repo references, with shorthand accepted for commit messages within the same repository