Skip to content

wick-automate: spot the repetition, propose the automation (v1.4.0)#6

Merged
Kielov merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/wick-automate-v1.4.0
Jul 2, 2026
Merged

wick-automate: spot the repetition, propose the automation (v1.4.0)#6
Kielov merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/wick-automate-v1.4.0

Conversation

@Kielov

@Kielov Kielov commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

New efficiency skill: detect when a task is repeated often enough to be worth automating, then propose the right automation - a deterministic PROGRAM or a judgment SKILL (or both). Core is the program-vs-skill classifier + a stability gate (don't automate a moving target) + a payoff estimate. Ships wick-automate skill + tools/wick-observer.mjs (PostToolUse hook -> memory/.observations.jsonl for cross-session mining) + a CLAUDE.md/WICK.md offered-reflection trigger. Skills 11->12. All four scanners green; observer smoke-tested; v1.3.0->1.4.0.

Detect task repetition in the work stream and propose the right automation - a
deterministic PROGRAM or a judgment SKILL (or both). The program-vs-skill classifier,
a stability gate (don't automate a moving target), and a payoff estimate are the core.

Added:
- .claude/skills/wick-automate/SKILL.md - detect (literal/structural/frictional) ->
  decide-if-worth-it -> classify program|skill|both -> draft -> propose (never auto-build)
- tools/wick-observer.mjs - PostToolUse hook logging {ts,tool,target} to
  memory/.observations.jsonl for cross-session mining (no LLM, no network, never blocks)
- CLAUDE.md + WICK.md - offered-reflection now offers wick-automate when a task repeats >=3x

Skills 11 -> 12. All four scanners green. Observer smoke-tested. version 1.3.0 -> 1.4.0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Kielov
Kielov merged commit 08941cd into main Jul 2, 2026
2 checks passed
@Kielov
Kielov deleted the feature/wick-automate-v1.4.0 branch July 2, 2026 17:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant