Skip to content

Conversation

@davidwtf
Copy link
Contributor

@davidwtf davidwtf commented Jan 19, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a comprehensive guide for evaluating Large Language Models, covering overview, installation, usage (basic to advanced), task types, datasets, configuration, examples, outputs, API considerations, and best practices.
    • Added an interactive quick-start notebook demonstrating CLI-driven workflows, task discovery, single- and multi-task evaluations, config-file usage, caching/resume, result inspection, and practical examples.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 19, 2026

Walkthrough

Adds two new documentation artifacts: a comprehensive Markdown guide on evaluating LLMs with lm-evaluation-harness and a Jupyter quick-start notebook demonstrating installation, task listing, evaluation workflows (basic to advanced), and examples.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation (Guide)
docs/en/solutions/How_to_Evaluate_LLM.md
New comprehensive Markdown guide covering overview, installation, supported backends and tokenization modes, task types and requirements, common workflows (single/multi-task, config files), usage examples, output formats, API considerations, and resources.
Documentation (Notebook)
docs/public/lm-eval/lm-eval_quick_star.ipynb
New Jupyter notebook quick-start demonstrating prerequisites, installation, listing/searching tasks, local and API evaluation examples, multi-task and config-driven workflows, caching/resume, advanced task examples (GSM8K, MMLU, multilingual), result inspection, and best practices.

Sequence Diagram(s)

(omitted — changes are documentation-only and do not introduce new multi-component control flow)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • Update README.md #20 — Related changes adding/updating documentation under docs/en/solutions and docs/public, aligning doc placement and formatting.

Suggested reviewers

  • typhoonzero
  • sinbadonline
  • zhaomingkun1030

Poem

🐇 I hopped through pages, tidy and bright,
A harness and notebook to guide the night.
Tasks and prompts in organized rows,
Testing seeds where model wisdom grows. 🌱

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title directly describes the main addition: comprehensive documentation and quick-start guide for evaluating Large Language Models using lm-evaluation-harness.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@docs/en/solutions/How_to_Evaluate_LLM.md`:
- Around line 531-532: The Markdown link in How_to_Evaluate_LLM.md points to a
dead target "../public/lm-eval/lm-eval_quick_star.ipynb" (typo/missing 't');
update that link target to the correct notebook location under docs/public
(e.g., replace "../public/lm-eval/lm-eval_quick_star.ipynb" with the correct
relative path to docs/public/lm-eval/lm-eval_quick_start.ipynb) so the "lm-eval
Quick Start Notebook" link resolves and the build succeeds.
- Around line 401-407: The Math & Reasoning Suite example uses the wrong
lm-evaluation-harness task name—replace the task token "math" in the lm-eval
command's --tasks argument with the official name "minerva_math" so the command
becomes: update the --tasks list (gsm8k,math,arc_challenge) to
(gsm8k,minerva_math,arc_challenge) in the example invocation for lm-eval (the
line with --tasks).
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/public/lm-eval/lm-eval_quick_star.ipynb (1)

178-182: Avoid hardcoding API keys in the notebook.

Direct assignment encourages storing secrets in notebooks. Prefer a prompt or external environment variable to reduce leak risk.

🔐 Proposed safer pattern
-        "import os\n",
-        "\n",
-        "# Set your OpenAI API key\n",
-        "os.environ['OPENAI_API_KEY'] = 'your-api-key-here'\n",
+        "import os\n",
+        "import getpass\n",
+        "\n",
+        "# Set your OpenAI API key (avoid committing real keys)\n",
+        "if not os.getenv('OPENAI_API_KEY'):\n",
+        "    os.environ['OPENAI_API_KEY'] = getpass.getpass('OpenAI API key: ')\n",

Please verify this still aligns with the recommended authentication flow in the OpenAI API docs.

Comment on lines +401 to +407
**Math & Reasoning Suite**:

```bash
lm-eval --model local-chat-completions \
--model_args model=MODEL_NAME,base_url=http://localhost:8000/v1 \
--tasks gsm8k,math,arc_challenge \
--output_path ./results
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

# First, let's check if the file exists and read the context around lines 401-407
fd "How_to_Evaluate_LLM.md" --type f

Repository: alauda/knowledge

Length of output: 100


🏁 Script executed:

# Read the file around lines 401-407 and context to see the table
cat -n docs/en/solutions/How_to_Evaluate_LLM.md | sed -n '350,450p'

Repository: alauda/knowledge

Length of output: 3131


🏁 Script executed:

# Search for the table mentioned in the review that lists "minerva_math"
rg "minerva_math" docs/en/solutions/How_to_Evaluate_LLM.md -B 5 -A 5

Repository: alauda/knowledge

Length of output: 1715


🌐 Web query:

lm-eval minerva_math vs math task name documentation

💡 Result:

Short answer: "minerva_math" is the lm-evaluation-harness task group implementing the Minerva / Minerva‑Math dataset (with several subgroups like minerva_math_algebra, etc.); "math" is a more generic/math-category task name used by some wrappers/distributions (or by platform catalogs) that can refer to one or more math tasks in the harness. To see exactly which dataset a given name runs, list tasks from your installed harness (python -m lm_eval --tasks list or lm-eval --tasks list). Sources: EleutherAI lm-evaluation-harness repo/docs and issue referencing minerva_math, and a packaging/registry listing showing a generic "math" task name. [1][2][3]

Sources

  • EleutherAI / lm-evaluation-harness (repo/documentation). [1]
  • Issue demonstrating use of the minerva_math task and its subgroups. [2]
  • Example packaging / product docs showing a generic "math" task label in tool catalogs (lists "math" as available). [3]

🌐 Web query:

lm-evaluation-harness official task names list math minerva_math

💡 Result:

Official lm-evaluation-harness task names for Minerva's MATH group:

  • minerva_math
  • minerva_math_algebra
  • minerva_math_counting_and_prob
  • minerva_math_geometry
  • minerva_math_intermediate_algebra
  • minerva_math_num_theory
  • minerva_math_prealgebra
  • minerva_math_precalc

Sources: GitHub issue showing these subtask names and example outputs [1]; lm-evaluation-harness repository/task listing (repo/releases/docs) [2].


🏁 Script executed:

# Let me check if there are any other references to "math" task (without minerva_ prefix) in the documentation
rg "tasks.*math" docs/en/solutions/How_to_Evaluate_LLM.md -i

Repository: alauda/knowledge

Length of output: 265


Update the Math & Reasoning Suite example to use the correct task name.

The table lists the MATH dataset as minerva_math, but the suite example at line 406 uses math. The correct official lm-evaluation-harness task name is minerva_math. This inconsistency will cause the example to fail when executed.

Fix
-    --tasks gsm8k,math,arc_challenge \
+    --tasks gsm8k,minerva_math,arc_challenge \
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
**Math & Reasoning Suite**:
```bash
lm-eval --model local-chat-completions \
--model_args model=MODEL_NAME,base_url=http://localhost:8000/v1 \
--tasks gsm8k,math,arc_challenge \
--output_path ./results
lm-eval --model local-chat-completions \
--model_args model=MODEL_NAME,base_url=http://localhost:8000/v1 \
--tasks gsm8k,minerva_math,arc_challenge \
--output_path ./results
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@docs/en/solutions/How_to_Evaluate_LLM.md` around lines 401 - 407, The Math &
Reasoning Suite example uses the wrong lm-evaluation-harness task name—replace
the task token "math" in the lm-eval command's --tasks argument with the
official name "minerva_math" so the command becomes: update the --tasks list
(gsm8k,math,arc_challenge) to (gsm8k,minerva_math,arc_challenge) in the example
invocation for lm-eval (the line with --tasks).

Comment on lines 531 to 532
Download the Jupyter notebook example: [lm-eval Quick Start Notebook](../public/lm-eval/lm-eval_quick_star.ipynb)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Fix dead notebook link to restore build.

Build failed due to a dead link pointing to ../public/lm-eval/lm-eval_quick_star.ipynb. Update the relative path to the actual location under docs/public.

🧩 Proposed fix
-Download the Jupyter notebook example: [lm-eval Quick Start Notebook](../public/lm-eval/lm-eval_quick_star.ipynb)
+Download the Jupyter notebook example: [lm-eval Quick Start Notebook](../../public/lm-eval/lm-eval_quick_star.ipynb)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@docs/en/solutions/How_to_Evaluate_LLM.md` around lines 531 - 532, The
Markdown link in How_to_Evaluate_LLM.md points to a dead target
"../public/lm-eval/lm-eval_quick_star.ipynb" (typo/missing 't'); update that
link target to the correct notebook location under docs/public (e.g., replace
"../public/lm-eval/lm-eval_quick_star.ipynb" with the correct relative path to
docs/public/lm-eval/lm-eval_quick_start.ipynb) so the "lm-eval Quick Start
Notebook" link resolves and the build succeeds.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@docs/en/solutions/How_to_Evaluate_LLM.md`:
- Line 311: The Markdown table row containing `truthfulqa_gen` /
`generate_until` with metric names `bleu_max`, `rouge1_max`, `rougeL_max`,
`bleurt_max` also references metric suffixes `_acc` and `_diff` which are being
rendered as emphasis; update that table cell by wrapping the `_acc` and `_diff`
tokens in backticks (e.g., `_acc` -> `_acc`) so they render as code literals and
avoid unintended Markdown emphasis—edit the table row that lists
`truthfulqa_gen`, `generate_until`, and the metric names to apply the backticks
consistently.
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
docs/en/solutions/How_to_Evaluate_LLM.md (2)

401-407: Use the official minerva_math task name in the suite.

The “Math & Reasoning Suite” uses math, but the dataset table lists minerva_math. This mismatch will fail when users run the command.

💡 Proposed fix
-    --tasks gsm8k,math,arc_challenge \
+    --tasks gsm8k,minerva_math,arc_challenge \

531-531: Fix the quick-start notebook link target (typo/404 risk).

The link uses lm-eval_quick_star.ipynb which appears to be a typo; verify the actual filename and update to prevent a broken link.

💡 Proposed fix (if filename is quick_start)
-Download the Jupyter notebook example: [lm-eval Quick Start Notebook](/lm-eval/lm-eval_quick_star.ipynb)
+Download the Jupyter notebook example: [lm-eval Quick Start Notebook](/lm-eval/lm-eval_quick_start.ipynb)

| | StoryCloze | `storycloze_2016` | `multiple_choice` | `acc` | Chat / Completion | Server-side | Story completion task |
| **Truthfulness & Safety** | TruthfulQA | `truthfulqa_mc1` | `multiple_choice` | `acc` | Chat / Completion | Server-side | Single-correct answer truthfulness |
| | | `truthfulqa_mc2` | `multiple_choice` | `acc` | Chat / Completion | Server-side | Multiple-correct answer truthfulness |
| | | `truthfulqa_gen` | `generate_until` | `bleu_max`, `rouge1_max`, `rougeL_max`, `bleurt_max` | Chat / Completion | Server-side | Generative truthfulness evaluation (also outputs _acc and _diff variants) |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Avoid unintended emphasis from _acc / _diff tokens.

Markdown treats underscores as emphasis; wrap these metric suffixes in backticks to prevent formatting artifacts.

✍️ Proposed fix
-- | | `truthfulqa_gen` | `generate_until` | `bleu_max`, `rouge1_max`, `rougeL_max`, `bleurt_max` | Chat / Completion | Server-side | Generative truthfulness evaluation (also outputs _acc and _diff variants) |
+- | | `truthfulqa_gen` | `generate_until` | `bleu_max`, `rouge1_max`, `rougeL_max`, `bleurt_max` | Chat / Completion | Server-side | Generative truthfulness evaluation (also outputs `*_acc` and `*_diff` variants) |
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

311-311: Spaces inside emphasis markers

(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@docs/en/solutions/How_to_Evaluate_LLM.md` at line 311, The Markdown table row
containing `truthfulqa_gen` / `generate_until` with metric names `bleu_max`,
`rouge1_max`, `rougeL_max`, `bleurt_max` also references metric suffixes `_acc`
and `_diff` which are being rendered as emphasis; update that table cell by
wrapping the `_acc` and `_diff` tokens in backticks (e.g., `_acc` -> `_acc`) so
they render as code literals and avoid unintended Markdown emphasis—edit the
table row that lists `truthfulqa_gen`, `generate_until`, and the metric names to
apply the backticks consistently.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@docs/public/lm-eval/lm-eval_quick_star.ipynb`:
- Around line 1-25: Rename the notebook file from lm-eval_quick_star.ipynb to
lm-eval_quick_start.ipynb to fix the typo; update any references to the notebook
name (e.g., links in docs, README, or navigation entries) so they point to
lm-eval_quick_start.ipynb and verify the notebook metadata/title if present
mentions "Quick Start" to keep naming consistent with the displayed heading.
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
docs/public/lm-eval/lm-eval_quick_star.ipynb (3)

131-151: Consider removing leading newline in YAML config.

The triple-quoted string starts with a newline, creating an empty first line in the generated YAML file. While typically harmless, it's cleaner to use .strip() or start the content immediately.

💡 Suggested fix
 # Create a configuration file
-config = """
-model: local-chat-completions
+config = """\
+model: local-chat-completions
 model_args:
   model: Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct
   base_url: http://localhost:8000/v1

Or alternatively use config.strip() when writing:

with open('eval_config.yaml', 'w') as f:
    f.write(config.strip())

163-174: Remove empty placeholder cells.

These empty markdown and code cells appear to be leftover placeholders and should be removed for a cleaner notebook.


213-232: Add error handling for results file loading.

The hardcoded path ./results/results.json assumes a specific output structure. lm-eval may create timestamped subdirectories or differently named files. Consider adding error handling and guidance for locating actual output files.

💡 Suggested improvement
 import json
+import os
+import glob
 
 # Load and display results
-with open('./results/results.json', 'r') as f:
-    results = json.load(f)
+# Find the most recent results file
+result_files = glob.glob('./results/**/results.json', recursive=True)
+if not result_files:
+    print("No results.json found. Please run an evaluation first.")
+else:
+    latest_file = max(result_files, key=os.path.getmtime)
+    print(f"Loading results from: {latest_file}")
+    with open(latest_file, 'r') as f:
+        results = json.load(f)
+    print("=== Evaluation Results ===")
+    print(json.dumps(results, indent=2))

Comment on lines +1 to +25
{
"cells": [
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"# LM-Evaluation-Harness Quick Start Guide\n",
"\n",
"This notebook demonstrates how to use the lm-evaluation-harness (lm-eval) to evaluate language models using command-line interface.\n",
"\n",
"## Prerequisites\n",
"\n",
"Install lm-eval with the required backends:"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": null,
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"# Install lm-eval with API support\n",
"!pip install \"lm_eval[api]\""
]
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Filename typo: quick_star should be quick_start.

The notebook filename lm-eval_quick_star.ipynb appears to have a typo. Consider renaming to lm-eval_quick_start.ipynb for clarity.

The prerequisites section and installation command look correct.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@docs/public/lm-eval/lm-eval_quick_star.ipynb` around lines 1 - 25, Rename the
notebook file from lm-eval_quick_star.ipynb to lm-eval_quick_start.ipynb to fix
the typo; update any references to the notebook name (e.g., links in docs,
README, or navigation entries) so they point to lm-eval_quick_start.ipynb and
verify the notebook metadata/title if present mentions "Quick Start" to keep
naming consistent with the displayed heading.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants