Skip to content

[client] fix inbox docs#51

Open
capcom6 wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
client/inbox/fix-docs
Open

[client] fix inbox docs#51
capcom6 wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
client/inbox/fix-docs

Conversation

@capcom6
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@capcom6 capcom6 commented May 8, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Improved documentation consistency for API request parameters.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot added the ready label May 8, 2026
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 8, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 8, 2026

Review Change Stack

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@capcom6 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 46 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review.

You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 496e287e-d6fc-487f-8ef1-0c91796b4aec

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 17a184b and 049f924.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • smsgateway/requests_inbox.go
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR updates inline documentation comments for the InboxRefreshRequest struct fields in smsgateway/requests_inbox.go. Field comments for DeviceID, Since, Until, MessageTypes, and TriggerWebhooks are revised for consistency and clarity. No functional code, field types, JSON tags, or struct definitions change.

Changes

Field Documentation

Layer / File(s) Summary
Field Documentation
smsgateway/requests_inbox.go
Inline comments for InboxRefreshRequest struct fields (DeviceID, Since, Until, MessageTypes, TriggerWebhooks) are updated for phrasing consistency and punctuation. The deprecated MessagesExportRequest type alias remains unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • android-sms-gateway/client-go#49: Directly related to the InboxRefreshRequest struct in the same file; likely covers related modifications to this request type.

Suggested labels

ready

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title '[client] fix inbox docs' accurately describes the main change: updating documentation/comments for the inbox request struct fields.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@smsgateway/requests_inbox.go`:
- Line 7: The struct field DeviceID in requests_inbox.go has a stray
double-quote at the end of its comment ("for".) — remove that extraneous quote
from the comment on the DeviceID field so the comment reads correctly (e.g.,
ending with "for." or rephrase as needed) by editing the DeviceID field's
comment near the DeviceID declaration.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: b41c3c7a-19af-4316-a834-15086761db62

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 964d39f and 17a184b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • smsgateway/requests_inbox.go

Comment thread smsgateway/requests_inbox.go Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant