Skip to content

docs: ignore linkcheck on repository changelog links#1003

Open
duposyl wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
docs/linkcheck-changelog
Open

docs: ignore linkcheck on repository changelog links#1003
duposyl wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
docs/linkcheck-changelog

Conversation

@duposyl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@duposyl duposyl commented May 4, 2026

We shouldn't check the PR links on the changelog... this can get extremely busy and useless in the long run. All PRs should exist since they point to content inside the repository.

@duposyl duposyl requested a review from a team as a code owner May 4, 2026 14:37
jwinkle8
jwinkle8 previously approved these changes May 4, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jwinkle8 jwinkle8 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Thanks!

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.58%. Comparing base (8835886) to head (0d5b685).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1003   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.58%   89.58%           
=======================================
  Files          67       67           
  Lines      190995   190995           
  Branches     1428     1428           
=======================================
+ Hits       171106   171108    +2     
+ Misses      19474    19472    -2     
  Partials      415      415           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jwinkle8 jwinkle8 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants