Support round trip reading / writing Arrow Duration type to parquet

[Liyixin95]

continue from previous pr. @alamb

• Closes write duration to parquet but read as int64 #5625

[alamb]

CI Failure should be fixed by @crepererum 's PR:

• fix: rustdoc::unportable_markdown was removed #7483

[alamb]

Thank you @Liyixin95 -- this looks really nice. I poked around and actually found that there were some pre-existing tests ❤️

I also tested this PR manually using the duration.parquet file from apache/parquet-testing#80 and the following code:

Details

fn main() {
    let file = File::open("/Users/andrewlamb/Downloads/duration.parquet").unwrap();
    let reader = ParquetRecordBatchReaderBuilder::try_new(file)
        .unwrap()
        .build()
        .unwrap();
    
    for batch in reader {
        let batch = batch.unwrap();
        println!("Read batch schema: {:?}", batch.schema());
        println!("Read batch num rows: {:?}", batch.num_rows());
        println!("Read batch pretty:\n{}", pretty_format_batches(&[batch]).unwrap());

    }
}

Before this PR:

Field { name: "a", data_type: Int64:

warning: `parquet_test` (bin "parquet_test") generated 1 warning
    Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.04s
     Running `target/debug/parquet_test`
Read batch schema: Schema { fields: [Field { name: "a", data_type: Int64, nullable: true, dict_id: 0, dict_is_ordered: false, metadata: {} }], metadata: {} }
Read batch num rows: 100
Read batch pretty:
+-------------+
| a           |
+-------------+
| 86400000000 |
...

After this PR (the schema shows duration):

Field { name: "a", data_type: Duration(Microsecond),

Read batch schema: Schema { fields: [Field { name: "a", data_type: Duration(Microsecond), nullable: true, dict_id: 0, dict_is_ordered: false, metadata: {} }], metadata: {} }
Read batch num rows: 100
Read batch pretty:
+----------+
| a        |
+----------+
| PT86400S |

[alamb]

I found there were already existing tests for the feature ❤️ (thanks @carols10cents )

[Liyixin95]

@alamb I poked around and actually found that there were some pre-existing tests

Oh, Thanks. I didn't notice there were some pre-existing tests. I just create the pr and go to sleep.

[alamb]

@alamb I poked around and actually found that there were some pre-existing tests

Oh, Thanks. I didn't notice there were some pre-existing tests. I just create the pr and go to sleep.

I didn't realize there were any tests either until I checked out the branch locally and they failed for me 😆