Migrate to a newer JDK

[vishesh92]

Description

This PR migrates jdk version from 11 to 21 🤞🏽 .

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• build/CI

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (9d4f071) 30.80% compared to head (a865652) 4.39%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #8411       +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     30.80%   4.39%   -26.42%     
============================================
  Files          5341     361     -4980     
  Lines        374864   28622   -346242     
  Branches      54518    4992    -49526     
============================================
- Hits         115485    1258   -114227     
+ Misses       244114   27225   -216889     
+ Partials      15265     139    -15126     

Flag	Coverage Δ
simulator-marvin-tests	?
uitests	4.39% <ø> (ø)
unit-tests	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[DaanHoogland]

good start let's see this through (cc @JoaoJandre )

[DaanHoogland]

can this come from the parent pom?

[DaanHoogland]

if we do 21 we have more time to think of our sins.

Suggested change

	<cs.jdk.version>17</cs.jdk.version>
	<cs.jdk.version>21</cs.jdk.version>

[DaanHoogland]

so this remains to be seen. depending on availabilities of libraries

[yadvr]

@vishesh92 @weizhouapache can this be closed if #8411 is melded with #8497 ?

[vishesh92]

@vishesh92 @weizhouapache can this be closed if #8411 is melded with #8497 ?

This PR was for migrating the JDK and upgrade the packages required for that as well. This will require a lot of work.

I am closing this PR for now. I will try to do this later in a way which includes small changes instead of a big PR. Most likely for 4.21.