UI: Add reconnect button to hosts on alert#8468
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.18 #8468 +/- ##
=============================================
+ Coverage 13.12% 29.54% +16.41%
- Complexity 9142 32266 +23124
=============================================
Files 2720 5341 +2621
Lines 257744 374918 +117174
Branches 40182 54534 +14352
=============================================
+ Hits 33839 110752 +76913
- Misses 219615 249487 +29872
- Partials 4290 14679 +10389
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@kiranchavala a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
UI build: ✔️ |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@kiranchavala a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 8242 |
|
@hsato03 |
02de6f8 to
3a10d73
Compare
Sure, I changed the target branch. |
|
@weizhouapache a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
UI build: ✔️ |
Currently, if a host is on alert, the option to reconnect it is not presented in the UI. This PR addresses this issue by adding a reconnect button to the host if it is in an alert state.


Description
Currently, if a host is on alert, the option to reconnect it is not presented in the UI.
This PR addresses this issue by adding a reconnect button to the host if it is in an alert state.
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
With a host on alert, I verified that the option to reconnect was present and, upon using it, I observed that the host reconnected as expected.