Merged
Conversation
ErbB4
previously approved these changes
May 23, 2024
Collaborator
ErbB4
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
looks good and I will come back to comment again after I use it.
Contributor
Author
|
Closed erroneously |
ErbB4
approved these changes
Feb 8, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add Adaptive Exponential Cells to Arbor. Motivation here is to add another useful cell kind before considering two major features:
Logically though, 2. should go before 1. since a plugin interface should declare how and if custom synapses are handled...
Closes #1832
More on request.