Add verifiable maintainer and evidence surfaces#3
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Why
The portfolio audit calls for maintainer intake and component-native visuals without expanding gdev-agent into a hosted-product claim. The failed Eval result should be visible while retaining exact raw provenance and local/synthetic limitations.
Impact
This is a maintainer/documentation/evidence tranche. It does not change application behavior, relax eval thresholds, claim a new quality result, or claim production use. The SVG is historical negative evidence for gdev-agent revision
0e4c5f0fd50382bbf12ffd35cfca4632384fb0cc.Validation
5ca5e42936262dc8cfd44c56ee0c60c420b7274129268613714: successTests + Lint: success, including Ruff, format, full tests, and eval regression gateCompose RLS + Demo: success312 passed, 45 warnings--checkpassed against the pinned v0.2.0 packagechallenge-run.jsonwas rejected by its manifest digestIndependent review
Read-only exact-head review found two issues and both were fixed in separate commits:
Final reviewer verdict: no remaining blockers or actionable findings.
Residual limits: private intake depends on the published maintainer email; Eval Lab's annotated tag is unsigned but commit/hash/content-address pinned; challenge evidence is historical local/synthetic and self-authored rather than an independent blind holdout.